Durable effectiveness and safety of hybrid ablation versus catheter ablation: 2-year results from the randomized CEASE-AF trial†
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, multicentrická studie
Grantová podpora
AtriCure, Inc
PubMed
40711852
PubMed Central
PMC12304665
DOI
10.1093/ejcts/ezaf146
PII: 8213596
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Hybrid ablation, Left atrial appendage, Surgical ablation,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- endokard chirurgie MeSH
- fibrilace síní * chirurgie MeSH
- katetrizační ablace * metody škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- venae pulmonales chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The CEASE-AF trial demonstrated that epicardial-endocardial hybrid ablation (HA) had superior effectiveness compared to endocardial catheter ablation (CA) for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), without significantly increasing major complications during a 12-month period. Most contemporary AF ablation trials have not evaluated durability beyond 12 months. Therefore, 24-month effectiveness and safety of HA and CA are compared. METHODS: CEASE-AF is a prospective, multicentre, randomized trial. Patients 18-75 years of age with symptomatic, drug refractory persistent AF and left atrial diameter >4.0 cm or long-standing persistent AF were randomized 2:1 to HA (posterior wall and pulmonary vein isolation with left atrial appendage exclusion) or CA (pulmonary vein isolation). Secondary effectiveness was freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia off class I/III anti-arrhythmic drugs except for those who previously failed at doses not exceeding those previously failed through a 24-month follow-up period. Major complications and reinterventions were evaluated. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population was 102 patients with HA and 52 patients with CA. Seventy-five percent were male, 80.5% had persistent AF and 19.5% had long-standing persistent AF, with a mean age of 60.7 ± 7.9 years. Effectiveness for 24 months was 66.3% (63/95) with HA and 33.3% (17/51) with CA [absolute difference 33.0% (95% confidence interval 14.3%, 48.3%; P < 0.001)]. Major complication rates were 10.8% (11/102) with HA and 9.6% (5/52) with CA (P = 1.0), and fewer patients had reinterventions after HA than CA [18.9% (18/95) vs 52.9% (27/51), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: CEASE-AF demonstrated that the 32.4% absolute benefit of HA over CA for 12 months was durable for 24 months at 33% with continued similar safety rates and fewer reinterventions after HA (funded by AtriCure, Inc.; NCT02695277). CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02695277.
AtriCure Europe B 5 Amsterdam The Netherlands
Departement of Cardiac Surgery Ceske Budejovice Hospital Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic
Departement of Cardiac Surgery Northern General Hospital Sheffield UK
Departement of Cardiac Surgery Schüchtermann Klinik Bad Rothenfelde Germany
Departement of Cardiac Surgery St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein The Netherlands
Departement of Electrophysiology Northern General Hospital Sheffield UK
Departement of Electrophysiology RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg Ludwigsburg Germany
Departement of Electrophysiology St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein The Netherlands
Department of Cardiology Ceske Budejovice Hospital Czech Republic
Department of Cardiology Schüchtermann Klinik Bad Rothenfelde Germany
Eberhard Karls University School of Medicine Tuebingen Germany
Faculty of Health and Social Sciences University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic
Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Mossakowski Medical Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw Poland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2024;149:e1–156. PubMed PMC
Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A et al. ; EAST-AFNET 4 Trial Investigators. Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1305–16. PubMed
Reddy VY, Gerstenfeld EP, Natale A et al. ; ADVENT Investigators. Pulsed field or conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2023;389:1660–71. PubMed
Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A et al. ; FIRE AND ICE Investigators. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2016;374:2235–45. PubMed
Duytschaever M, De Potter T, Grimaldi M et al. ; inspIRE Trial Investigators. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a novel variable-loop biphasic pulsed field ablation catheter integrated with a 3-dimensional mapping system: 1-year outcomes of the multicenter inspIRE study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2023;16:e011780. PubMed PMC
Mansour M, Calkins H, Osorio J et al. Persistent atrial fibrillation ablation with contact force-sensing catheter: the prospective multicenter PRECEPT trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2020;6:958–69. PubMed
Verma A, Haines DE, Boersma LV et al. ; PULSED AF Investigators. Pulsed field ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: PULSED AF Pivotal Trial. Circulation 2023;147:1422–32. PubMed PMC
Lo M, Nair D, Mansour M et al. Contact force catheter ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: results from the PERSIST-END study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2023;34:279–90. PubMed
Su WW, Reddy VY, Bhasin K et al. ; STOP Persistent AF Investigators. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for persistent atrial fibrillation: results from the multicenter STOP Persistent AF trial. Heart Rhythm 2020;17:1841–7. PubMed
Sau A, Kapadia S, Al-Aidarous S et al. Temporal trends and lesion sets for persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis and meta-regression. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2023;16:e011861. PubMed PMC
Anter E, Mansour M, Nair DG et al. ; SPHERE PER-AF Investigators. Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. Nat Med 2024;30:2303–10. PubMed PMC
Chieng D, Sugumar H, Ling LH et al. Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicenter randomized trial of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) versus PVI with posterior left atrial wall isolation (PWI)—the CAPLA study. Am Heart J 2022;243:210–20. PubMed
Turagam MK, Neuzil P, Schmidt B et al. Impact of left atrial posterior wall ablation during pulsed field ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol EP 2024;10:900–12. PubMed
Tsai TY, Lo LW, Cheng WH et al. 10-year outcomes of patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation. Circ J 2022;87:84–91. PubMed
Winkle RA, Mead RH, Engel G et al. Very long term outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation. Heart Rhythm 2023;20:680–8. PubMed
DeLurgio DB, Crossen KJ, Gill J et al. Hybrid convergent procedure for the treatment of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: results of CONVERGE clinical trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2020;13:e009288. PubMed
Doll N, Weimar T, Kosior DA et al. Efficacy and safety of hybrid epicardial and endocardial ablation versus endocardial ablation in patients with persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomised, controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine 2023;61:102052. PubMed PMC
van der Heijden CAJ, Weberndorfer V, Vroomen M et al. Hybrid ablation versus repeated catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2023;9:1013–23. PubMed
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J et al. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2024;26;1–107.
Van Gelder IC, Rienstra M, Bunting KV et al. ; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2024;45:3314–414. PubMed
Pannone L, Mouram S, Della Rocca DG et al. Hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: long-term outcomes from a single-centre 10-year experience. Europace 2023;25;1–9. PubMed PMC
Dunnington GH, Pierce CL, Eisenberg S et al. A heart-team hybrid approach for atrial fibrillation: a single-centre long-term clinical outcome cohort study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021;60:1343–50. PubMed
Sanchez-Somonte P, Kittichamroen N, Gao-Kang J et al. Incremental efficacy for repeat ablation procedures for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: 5-year follow-up. JACC Adv 2024;3:101200. PubMed PMC
Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR et al. ; STAR AF II Investigators. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1812–22. PubMed
William J, Chieng D, Curtin AG et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation by pulmonary vein isolation with or without left atrial posterior wall isolation: long-term outcomes of the CAPLA trial. Eur Heart J 2025;46:132–43. PubMed
Tung R, Burris R, Salazar P, Aziz Z. Human recordings of left atrial epicardial-endocardial asynchrony during persistent atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2022;15:e010605. PubMed
Nakamura K, Sasaki T, Minami K et al. Incidence, distribution, and electrogram characteristics of endocardial-epicardial connections identified by ultra-high-resolution mapping during a left atrial posterior wall isolation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024;67:773–84. PubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02695277