The role of parental religiosity in shaping paternal investment: evidence from Bangladesh and India
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
Templeton Religion Trust
TWCF - United States
John Templeton Foundation
PubMed
40832773
PubMed Central
PMC12365927
DOI
10.1098/rspb.2025.1352
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Bangladesh, India, allomaternal care, parental religiosity, paternal investment,
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- náboženství * MeSH
- otcové * psychologie MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Bangladéš MeSH
- Indie MeSH
Among humans, paternal investment has been shown to enhance both fertility and offspring survival. While psychological and ecological influences on human paternal investment are relatively well documented, cultural influences remain less well understood. It has been proposed that religion can be an important socio-cultural factor shaping paternal investment. First, religions often instill pro-family values in fathers, potentially increasing their investment. Second, if religions promote pro-family values in mothers, these values may be communicated through religious behaviours, encouraging greater paternal investment. Alternatively, fathers may use maternal religiosity as a strategic cue of maternal pro-family commitment to reduce their own investment, shifting responsibility to mothers. To evaluate these hypotheses, we analyse data from 1238 children under 17 years old across 822 households in India and Bangladesh. Our findings suggest that in India, paternal religiosity is positively associated with fathers' housework assistance and emotional support to mothers. In Bangladesh, maternal religiosity is positively associated with paternal emotional support to mothers and child provisioning. In both countries, maternal religiosity positively associates with paternal investment among the most religious fathers. These findings indicate that religion plays a complex role in paternal investment, shaped by the interplay of parental religiosity and socio-ecological context.
Centre for Culture and Evolution Brunel University of London Uxbridge UB8 3PH UK
Department of Anthropology Baylor University Waco TX 76798 7173 USA
Department of Anthropology Binghamton University Binghamton NY 13902 6000 USA
Department of Anthropology Penn State University University Park PA 16802 USA
Department of Anthropology University of Connecticut Storrs CT 06269 1176 USA
Department of Global Health and Population Harvard University Boston MA 02115 USA
Faculty of Economics European Research University 702 00 Ostrava Czech Republic
Human Nutrition Unit Mahidol University Nakhon Pathom 73170 Thailand
ICDDRB Public Health Sciences Division Dhaka 1212 Bangladesh
Population Health London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London WC1E 7HT UK
Religion Programme University of Otago Dunedin 9016 Otago New Zealand
Society for Health and Demographic Surveillance Suri West Bengal India 731101
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Geary DC. 2000. Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychol. Bull. 126, 55–77. ( 10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.55) PubMed DOI
Geary DC. 2015. Evolution of paternal investment. In The handbook of evolutionary psychology (ed. Buss DM), pp. 524–541. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. ( 10.1002/9781119125563) DOI
Case A, Lubotsky D, Paxson C. 2002. Economic status and health in childhood: the origins of the gradient. Am. Econ. Rev. 92, 1308–1334. ( 10.1257/000282802762024520) PubMed DOI
Velková A, Tureček P. 2022. Influence of parental death on child mortality and the phenomenon of the stepfamily in western Bohemia in 1708–1834. Hist. Fam. 27, 434–452. ( 10.1080/1081602X.2021.1986738) DOI
Mattison SM, Scelza B, Blumenfield T. 2014. Paternal investment and the positive effects of fathers among the matrilineal Mosuo of southwest China. Am. Anthropol. 116, 591–610. ( 10.1111/aman.12125) DOI
Shenk MK, Scelza BA. 2012. Paternal investment and status-related child outcomes: timing of father’s death affects offspring success. J. Biosocial Sci. 44, 549–569. ( 10.1017/s0021932012000053) PubMed DOI
Scelza BA. 2010. Fathers’ presence speeds the social and reproductive careers of sons. Curr. Anthropol. 51, 295–303. ( 10.1086/651051) DOI
Case A, Paxson C. 2002. Parental behavior and child health. Health Aff. 21, 164–178. ( 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.164) PubMed DOI
Lawson DW, Schaffnit SB, Hassan A, Ngadaya E, Ngowi B, Mfinanga SGM, James S, Borgerhoff Mulder M. 2017. Father absence but not fosterage predicts food insecurity, relative poverty, and poor child health in northern Tanzania. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 29, e22938. ( 10.1002/ajhb.22938) PubMed DOI
Gaulin SJC, Schlegel A. 1980. Paternal confidence and paternal investment: a cross cultural test of a sociobiological hypothesis. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1, 301–309. ( 10.1016/0162-3095(80)90015-1) DOI
Hewlett BS. 1992. Father-child relations: cultural and biosocial contexts. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.
Selin H (ed). 2014. Parenting across cultures: childrearing, motherhood and fatherhood in non-Western cultures. Berlin, Germany: Springer. See http://www.springer.com/series/6504.
Shenk MK. 2011. Our children: parental decisions — how much to invest in your offspring. In Essential building blocks of human nature (eds Frey UJ, Störmer C, Willführ KP), pp. 17–38. Berlin, Germany: Springer. ( 10.1007/978-3-642-13968-0_2) DOI
Hrdy SB. 2009. Mothers and others: the evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Sear R. 2016. Beyond the nuclear family: an evolutionary perspective on parenting. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 7, 98–103. ( 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.013) DOI
Sear R. 2021. The male breadwinner nuclear family is not the ‘traditional’ human family, and promotion of this myth may have adverse health consequences. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200020. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0020) PubMed DOI PMC
Hofferth SL, Anderson KG. 2003. Are all dads equal? Biology versus marriage as a basis for paternal investment. J. Marriage Fam. 65, 213–232. ( 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00213.x) DOI
Scelza BA, et al. 2020. Patterns of paternal investment predict cross-cultural variation in jealous response. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 20–26. ( 10.1038/s41562-019-0654-y) PubMed DOI PMC
Alvergne A, Faurie C, Raymond M. 2009. Father–offspring resemblance predicts paternal investment in humans. Anim. Behav. 78, 61–69. ( 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.019) DOI
Prall SP, Scelza BA. 2020. Why men invest in non-biological offspring: paternal care and paternity confidence among Himba pastoralists. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20192890. ( 10.1098/rspb.2019.2890) PubMed DOI PMC
Feldman SS, Nash SC, Aschenbrenner BG. 1983. Antecedents of fathering. Child Dev. 54, 1628–1636.
Belsky J. 1984. The determinants of parenting: a process model. Child Dev. 55, 83–96. ( 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1984.tb00275.x) PubMed DOI
Bulbulia J, Shaver JH, Greaves LM, Sosis R, Sibley CG. 2015. Religion and parental cooperation: an empirical test of Slone’s sexual signaling model. In The attraction of religion: a new evolutionary psychology of religion (eds Slone JD, Slyke JA), pp. 29–62. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
Slone JD. 2008. The attraction of religion: a sexual selectionist account. In The evolution of religion: studies, theories, and critiques (eds Bulbulia J, Sosis R, Harris E, Genet R, Genet C, Wyman K), pp. 181–187. Santa Margarita, CA: Collins Foundation Press.
Slyke JAV, Szocik K. 2020. Sexual selection and religion. Arch. Psychol. Relig. 42, 123–141. ( 10.2307/27077679) DOI
Van Slyke JA. 2023. Sexual selection: long-term mating strategies and religion. In The Routledge handbook of evolutionary approaches to religion (eds Lior Y, Justin L), pp. 65–81. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge. ( 10.4324/b23047-8) DOI
Xygalatas D, Maňo P, Kundt R, Kundtová-Klocová E. 2022. Rituals as signals of mate quality. Curr. Res. Ecol. Soc. Psychol. 3, 100048. ( 10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100048) DOI
Atkins DC, Kessel DE. 2008. Religiousness and infidelity: attendance, but not faith and prayer, predict marital fidelity. J. Marriage Fam. 70, 407–418. ( 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00490.x) DOI
Atkinson QD, Bourrat P. 2011. Beliefs about God, the afterlife and morality support the role of supernatural policing in human cooperation. Evol. Hum. Behav. 32, 41–49. ( 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.008) DOI
Burdette AM, Ellison CG, Hill TD, Glenn ND. 2009. ‘Hooking up’ at college: does religion make a difference? J. Sci. Study Relig. 48, 535–551. ( 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01464.x) DOI
Simons LG, Burt CH, Peterson FR. 2009. The effect of religion on risky sexual behavior among college students. Deviant Behav. 30, 467–485. ( 10.1080/01639620802296279) DOI
Weeden J, Cohen AB, Kenrick DT. 2008. Religious attendance as reproductive support. Evol. Hum. Behav. 29, 327–334. ( 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.03.004) PubMed DOI PMC
Weeden J, Kurzban R. 2013. What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals. Evol. Hum. Behav. 34, 440–445. ( 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.006) DOI
Petts RJ. 2007. Religious participation, religious affiliation, and engagement with children among fathers experiencing the birth of a new child. J. Fam. Issues 28, 1139–1161. ( 10.1177/0192513x07300788) DOI
Petts RJ. 2018. Paternity leave, father involvement, and parental conflict: the moderating role of religious participation. Religions 9, 289. ( 10.3390/rel9100289) PubMed DOI PMC
Spake L, et al. 2024. Religious women receive more allomaternal support from non-partner kin in two low-fertility countries. Evol. Hum. Behav. 45, 268–280. ( 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.04.001) DOI
Hossain Z. 2014. Parental beliefs and fathers’ and mothers’ roles in Malaysian families. In Parenting across cultures (ed. Selin H), pp. 77–90. Berlin, Germany: Springer. ( 10.1007/978-94-007-7503-9_7) DOI
Shaver JH. 2024. Mothers’ religious involvement is associated with higher fertility, lower parental investments, but more alloparental investments. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 36, e24144. ( 10.1002/ajhb.24144) PubMed DOI PMC
Chvaja R, Chinchilla J, Goméz Á, Lang M. 2023. Religious costly signal induces more trustworthiness than secular costly signal: a study of pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela. Eur. J. Social Psychol. 53, 1294–1308. ( 10.1002/ejsp.2975) DOI
Chvaja R, Spake L, Hassan A, Shenk MK, Sosis R, Shaver J. 2025. Maternal religiosity and social support to mothers: helpers’ religious identity matters. Religion Brain Behav. 1–22. ( 10.1080/2153599X.2025.2454705) DOI
Alam N, et al. 2017. Health and demographic surveillance system (HDSS) in Matlab, Bangladesh. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46, 809–816. ( 10.1093/ije/dyx076) PubMed DOI
Ghosh S, et al. 2015. Health & demographic surveillance system profile: the Birbhum population project (Birbhum HDSS). Int. J. Epidemiol. 44, 98–107. ( 10.1093/ije/dyu228) PubMed DOI
Rai RK, Barik A, Bromage S, Dhali GK, Chowdhury A. 2024. Cohort profile update: Birbhum Health and Demographic Surveillance System, India. Int. J. Epidemiol. 54, dyae172. ( 10.1093/ije/dyae172) PubMed DOI
Unwin T, Klein D, Toyama K. 2010. Open Data Kit: tools to build information services for developing regions. In Proc. 4th ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. Information and Communication Technologies and Development, London, UK, 13–16 December 2010, article no. 18. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. ( 10.1145/2369220.2369236) DOI
Lynch R, Schaffnit S, Sear R, Sosis R, Shaver JH, Alam N, Blumenfield T, Mattison SM, Shenk M. 2022. Religiosity is associated with greater size, kin density, and geographic dispersal of women’s social networks in Bangladesh. Scient. Rep. 12, 18780. ( 10.1038/s41598-022-22972-w) PubMed DOI PMC
RGCCI . 2011. Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India https://www.india.gov.in/my-government/documents/census-report
Revelle W. 2020.
R Core Team . 2024. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. See http://www.R-project.org/.
Brooks M, Kristensen K, van Benthem K, Magnusson A, Berg C, Nielsen A, Skaug H, Mächler M, Bolker B. 2017. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9, 378–400. ( 10.32614/rj-2017-066) DOI
Christensen RHB. 2024.
Chvaja R, Řezníček D. 2019. An integrative framework of commitment displays in religious systems. Hum. Ethol. 34, 41–52. ( 10.22330/he/34/041-052) DOI
Lang M, Chvaja R, Purzycki BG, Václavík D, Staněk R. 2022. Advertising cooperative phenotype through costly signals facilitates collective action. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9, 202202. ( 10.1098/rsos.202202) PubMed DOI PMC
Lang M, Eva KK, Ružičková A, Čellarová K, Chvaja R. 2025. Differential cost-benefit estimation stabilizes cooperative benefits of commitment signals. psyArxiv. ( 10.31234/osf.io/7bdt2_v1) DOI
Sosis R. 2003. Why aren’t we all Hutterites? Costly signaling theory and religious behavior. Hum. Nat. 14, 91–127. ( 10.1007/s12110-003-1000-6) PubMed DOI
Chvaja R. 2024. Costly signaling as an integral part of the systemic approach to religion: critical assessment from within the field. J. Cogn. Sci. Relig. 10, 90–99. ( 10.1558/jcsr.23765) DOI
Havlíček J, Štěrbová Z, Csajbók Z. 2022. Human mate choice. In Routledge international handbook of comparative psychology (eds Freeberg TM, Ridley AR, d'Ettorre P), pp. 338–354. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.
Krueger JI. 2002. On the reduction of self-other asymmetries: benefits, pitfalls, and other correlates of social projection. Psychol. Belg. 42, 23–41. ( 10.5334/pb.984) DOI
Robbins JM, Krueger JI. 2005. Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: a review and meta-analysis. Pers. Social Psychol. Rev. 9, 32–47. ( 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3) PubMed DOI
Krueger JI. 2007. From social projection to social behaviour. Eur. Rev. Social Psychol. 18, 1–35. ( 10.1080/10463280701284645) DOI
Samore T, et al. In press. Religious parents receive more alloparental aid in rural Bangladesh. Evol. Hum. Sci.
Barker JL, Power EA, Heap S, Puurtinen M, Sosis R. 2019. Content, cost, and context: a framework for understanding human signaling systems. Evol. Anthropol. 28, 86–99. ( 10.1002/evan.21768) PubMed DOI
Bliege Bird RB, Ready E, Power EA. 2018. The social significance of subtle signals. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 452–457. ( 10.1038/s41562-018-0298-3) PubMed DOI
Purzycki BG, Sosis R. 2022. Religion evolving: cultural, cognitive, and ecological dynamics. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
Sosis R. 2019. The building blocks of religious systems: approaching religion as a complex adaptive system. In Evolution, development and complexity: multiscale evolutionary models of complex adaptive systems (eds Georgiev GY, Smart JM, Florez Martinez CL, Price ME), pp. 421–450. London, UK: Springer.
Purzycki BG, Bendixen T, Lightner AD, Sosis R. 2022. Gods, games, and the socioecological landscape. Curr. Res. Ecol. Social Psychol. 3, 100057. ( 10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100057) DOI
Sear R, Steele F, McGregor IA, Mace R. 2002. The effects of kin on child mortality in rural Gambia. Demography 39, 43–63. ( 10.2307/3088363) PubMed DOI
Beise J, Voland E. 2002. A multilevel event history analysis of the effects of grandmothers on child mortality in a historical German population (Krummhörn, Ostfriesland, 1720-1874). Demogr. Res. 7, 469–497. ( 10.4054/demres.2002.7.13) DOI
Coall DA, Hertwig R. 2010. Grandparental investment: past, present, and future. Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 1–19. ( 10.1017/s0140525x09991105) PubMed DOI
Gibson MA, Mace R. 2005. Helpful grandmothers in rural Ethiopia: a study of the effect of kin on child survival and growth. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26, 469–482. ( 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.004) DOI
Kramer KL. 2010. Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 39, 417–436. ( 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105054) DOI
Kramer KL. 2024. Allocare. In Human behavioral ecology (eds Koster J, Scelza B, Shenk M), pp. 283–306. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ( 10.1017/9781108377911.002) DOI
Sear R, Mace R, McGregor IA. 2000. Maternal grandmothers improve nutritional status and survival of children in rural Gambia. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 1641–1647. ( 10.1098/rspb.2000.1190) PubMed DOI PMC
Sear R, Coall D. 2011. How much does family matter? Cooperative breeding and the demographic transition. Popul. Dev. Rev. 37, 81–112. ( 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00379.x) PubMed DOI
Sear R, Mace R. 2008. Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evol. Hum. Behav. 29, 1–18. ( 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.10.001) DOI
Hamadani JD, Tofail F. 2014. Childrearing, motherhood and fatherhood in Bangladeshi culture. In Parenting across cultures: childrearing, motherhood and fatherhood in non-Western cultures (ed. Selin H), pp. 123–144. Berlin, Germany: Springer. ( 10.1007/978-94-007-7503-9_10). See http://www.springer.com/series/6504. DOI
Saraff A, Srivastava HC. 2008. Envisioning fatherhood: Indian fathers’ perceptions of an ideal father. Popul. Rev 47, 45–59. ( 10.1353/prv.0.0002) DOI
Schaffnit SB, Sear R. 2017. Support for new mothers and fertility in the United Kingdom: not all support is equal in the decision to have a second child. Popul. Stud. 71, 345–361. ( 10.1080/00324728.2017.1349924) PubMed DOI
Snopkowski K, Sear R. 2013. Kin influences on fertility in Thailand: effects and mechanisms. Evol. Hum. Behav. 34, 130–138. ( 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.004) DOI
Snopkowski K, Sear R. 2016. Does grandparental help mediate the relationship between kin presence and fertility? Demogr. Res. 34, 467–498. ( 10.4054/demres.2016.34.17) DOI
Shaver JH, White TAJ, Vakaoti P, Lang M. 2021. A comparison of self-report, systematic observation and third-party judgments of church attendance in a rural Fijian village. PLoS One 16, e0257160. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0257160) PubMed DOI PMC
Kramer KL. 2011. The evolution of human parental care and recruitment of juvenile help. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 533–540. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.002) PubMed DOI
Irons W. 2001. Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In Evolution and the capacity for commitment (ed. Nesse R), pp. 292–309. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Rappaport R. 1999. Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin C. 2009. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ( 10.1017/CBO9780511703829) DOI
Miller G. 2001. The mating mind: how sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Buss DM. 2002. Sex, marriage, and religion: what adaptive problems do religious phenomena solve? Psychol. Inq. 13, 201–203. ( 10.1207/S15327965PLI1303_05) DOI
Chvaja R. 2025. The role of parental religiosity in shaping paternal investment: evidence from Bangladesh and India. OSF. ( 10.17605/OSF.IO/WRK5G) DOI
Chvaja R, Shaver JH, Spake L, Hassan A, Alam N, Rai RKet al. 2025. Supplementary material from: The role of parental religiosity in shaping paternal investment: evidence from Bangladesh and India. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7979962) DOI