BACKGROUND: Orofacial clefts are common congenital malformations, affecting both facial aesthetics and function. Intubation in newborns with cleft lip and palate is challenging and carries a high risk of oral tissue damage. This study investigates the use of a customized protective palatal obturator (CPPO) to improve intubation safety and reduce tissue injury during cleft lip surgery. METHODS: A single-center, randomized neonatal sub-study was conducted, including 55 newborns who underwent cleft lip surgery. Patients were randomized into an intervention group (CPPO use) and a control group (standard intubation without CPPO). The primary aim was to evaluate the degree of oral tissue injury during intubation, its severity, and location, in both groups, secondary aims included laryngoscopy image during intubation (modified Cormack-Lehane scoring system), intubation time, and attempts, number of intubations attempts and anesthesiologic complication during intubation. This study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04422847 and NCT04422964). RESULTS: No tissue damage occurred in the CPPO group, while the control group had a 21.4% incidence of tissue injury (p = .023). Secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant differences between groups for intubation time or the number of intubation attempts. Difficult intubation was less frequent in the CPPO group (40.7%) compared to the control group (50%), though this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The CPPO significantly reduces the risk of tissue damage during intubation in newborns undergoing cleft lip surgery, without increasing intubation time or attempts. It is particularly beneficial for severe clefts, and its use may facilitate safer airway management in these high-risk patients.

Customized protective palatal obturators enhance intubation safety in newborns with cleft lip, alveolus and palate.The customized protective palatal obturator is especially advantageous for patients with more severe clefts, offering better protection against tissue damage during intubation.The customized protective palatal obturator does not prolong intubation time or increase the number of intubation attempts, making it an effective tool for better airway management without added difficulty or delay.

Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic

Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic

Department of Simulation Medicine of the Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Solid Mechanics Mechatronics and Biomechanics Brno University of Technology Brno Czech Republic

Faculty of Medicine Department of Anatomy Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Wang D, Zhang B, Zhang Q, et al. Global, regional and national burden of orofacial clefts from 1990 to 2019: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Ann Med. 2023;55(1):2215540. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2215540. PubMed DOI PMC

Shaw WC, Semb G, Nelson P, et al. The Eurocleft project 1996-2000: overview. J. Cranio-Maxillo-Fac. Surg. 29(3):131–140. doi: 10.1054/jcms.2001.0217. PubMed DOI

Kelly SS, Suarez CA, Mirsky NA, et al. Application of 3D printing in cleft lip and palate repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2025;36(3):1071–1079. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010294. PubMed DOI

Košková O, Vokurková J, Vokurka J, et al. Treatment outcome after neonatal cleft lip repair in 5-year-old children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;87:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.05.024. PubMed DOI

Denning S, Ng E, Wong Riff KWY.. Anaesthesia for cleft lip and palate surgery. BJA Educ. 2021;21(10):384–389. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.06.002. PubMed DOI PMC

Mahmoud AAA, Fouad AZ, Mansour MA, et al. A novel intubation technique in bilateral cleft palate pediatric patients: hard gum shield-aided intubation. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013;23(4):349–354. doi: 10.1111/pan.12080. PubMed DOI

Karayazgan B, Gunay Y, Gurbuzer B, et al. A preoperative appliance for a newborn with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(1):53–57. doi: 10.1597/07-093.1. PubMed DOI

Mourão J, Moreira J, Barbosa J, et al. Soft tissue injuries after direct laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2015;27(8):668–671. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.07.009. PubMed DOI

Ray A, Sen IM, Bhardwaj N, et al. Videolaryngoscopic versus direct laryngoscopic paraglossal intubation for cleft lip/palate reconstructive surgeries: a randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65(8):593–599. PMID: 34584282; PMCID: PMC8445211. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_463_21. PubMed DOI PMC

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group . CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):726–732. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232. PubMed DOI

Richtrova M, Koskova O, Marcian P, et al. Use of computer-aided design and 3D printing for airway management in paediatric patients with a cleft facial defect: a pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2023;130(6):E469–E471. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.015. PubMed DOI

Huotilainen E, Jaanimets R, Valášek J, et al. Inaccuracies in additive manufactured medical skull models caused by the DICOM to STL conversion process. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(5):e259–e265. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.10.001. PubMed DOI

Salmi M, Paloheimo K-S, Tuomi J, et al. Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(7):603–609. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.041. PubMed DOI

Yentis SM, Lee DJ.. Evaluation of an improved scoring system for the grading of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1998;53(11):1041–1044. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00605.x. PubMed DOI

Bunsangjaroen P, Thongrong C, Pannengpetch P, et al. Anesthetic techniques and perioperative complications of cleft lip and cleft palate surgery at srinagarind hospital. J. Med. Assoc. Thail. Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2015;98(Suppl 7):S158–S163. PubMed

Chilakapati S, Mishra SK, Rudingwa P, et al. Ease of intubation using oral Microcuff RAE (Ring–Adair–Elwyn) tube with and without premounted Frova intubating introducer in children undergoing cleft lip and palate surgeries—A randomised controlled study. Indian J Anaesth. 2025;69(5):458–464. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1117_24. PubMed DOI PMC

Taman HI, Ramadan TH, Elshahawy ME, et al. Comparing the usefulness of vividtrac and classic macintosh laryngoscope in intubation in pediatric patients with cleft palate. Ain Shams J.Anaesthesiol. 2023;15(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s42077-023-00335-5. DOI

Fillies T, Homann C, Meyer U, et al. Perioperative complications in infant cleft repair. Head Face Med. 2007;3(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-3-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Desalu I, Adeyemo WL, Akintimoye MO, et al. Airway and respiratory complications in children undergoing cleft lip and palate repair. Ghana Med J. 2010;44(1):16–20. doi: 10.1186/s42077-023-00335-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Gunawardana RH. Difficult laryngoscopy in cleft lip and palate surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76(6):757–759. doi: 10.1093/bja/76.6.757. PubMed DOI

Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li P, et al. The clinical observation of difficult laryngoscopy and difficult intubation in infants with cleft lip and palate. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16(3):283–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01762.x. PubMed DOI

Gupta N, Nagar K, Dixit P, et al. Airway consideration in cleft patients—challenges and approaches. J. Cleft Lip Palate Craniofac. Anomal. 2022;9(1):55–59. doi: 10.4103/jclpca.jclpca_25_21. DOI

Nelson T, Cobos SF, Gandhi V, et al. Evaluation of a 3D-printed cleft palate obturator using a low-dose cone beam computed tomography acquisition protocol: a proof-of-concept study. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e57602. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57602. PubMed DOI PMC

Fontanals M, Merritt G, Sierra P, et al. Anesthetic considerations and complications of cleft palate repairs: what’s new? Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2021;11(3):257–264. doi: 10.1007/s40140-021-00460-7. DOI

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT04422964, NCT04422847