Diversity in Resource Use Strategies Promotes Productivity in Young Planted Tree Species Mixtures

. 2025 Sep ; 31 (9) : e70493.

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid41013876

Grantová podpora
ANR-20-EBI5-0003 Agence Nationale de la Recherche
BELSPO
451394862 DFG CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
FZT 118 DFG CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
202548816 DFG CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
Ei 862/29-1 DFG CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
532776526 DFG CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
2019/24318-6 FAPESP
2020/15230-5 FAPESP
2021/10573-4 FAPESP
BA 1494/9-1 FAPESP
22047-5 Shell Brazil
I 5086-B FWF CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
2020-02339 Swedish Research Council Formas
NSF-DBI-2021898 National Science Foundation ASCEND Biology Integration Institute
Climate & Biodiversity Initiative of the BNP Paribas Foundation
Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Württemberg
European Social Fund
Walloon forest service (SPW-DNF)
2106014 NSF CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
2044406 NSF CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
2019-02007 Formas
2021-02132 Formas
10106348 Horizon Europe Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action
National Forest Company
090316 016-FR MULTIFOR the Forestry Commission and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund ERDF)
USDA Forest Service
Australian Research Council
101087262 European Union's Horizon
National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP)
CN_00000033 European Union- NextGenerationEU
CUP J83C22000870007 European Union- NextGenerationEU
University of Freiburg, Germany
Federal Forestry Office Thüringer Wald

Mixed-species forestry is a promising approach to enhance productivity, increase carbon sequestration, and mitigate climate change. Diverse forests, composed of species with varying structures and functional trait profiles, may have higher functional and structural diversity, which are attributes relevant to a number of mechanisms that can influence productivity. However, it remains unclear whether the context-dependent roles of functional identity, functional diversity, and structural diversity can lead to a generalized understanding of tree diversity effects on stand productivity. To address these gaps, we analyzed growth data from 83,600 trees from 89 species across 21 young tree diversity experiments spanning five continents and three biomes. Results revealed a positive saturating relationship between tree species richness and stand productivity, with reduced variability in growth rates among more diverse stands. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that functional diversity mediated the positive effects of species richness on productivity. We additionally report a negative relationship between structural diversity and productivity, which decreased with increasing species richness. When partitioning net diversity effects, we found that selection effects played a dominant role in driving the overall increase in productivity in these predominantly young stands, contributing 77% of the net diversity effect. Selection effects increased with diversity in wood density. Furthermore, acquisitive species with lower wood density and higher leaf nitrogen content had higher productivity in more diverse stands, while conservative species showed neutral to slightly negative responses to species mixing. Together, these results suggest that combining acquisitive with conservative species allows acquisitive species to drive positive selection effects while conservative species tolerate competition. Thus, contrasting resource-use strategies can enhance productivity to optimize mixed-species forestry, with potential for both ecological and economic benefits.

Biodiversity Macroecology and Biogeography University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany

Center for Carbon Research on Tropical Agriculture University of São Paulo Piracicaba São Paulo Brazil

Centre for Forest Management Forest Research Alice Holt Lodge Farnham Surrey UK

Chair of Silviculture Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

CIRAD UMR Eco and Sols Montpellier France

College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin Stevens Point Stevens Point Wisconsin USA

Département des sciences biologiques Université du Québec à Montréal Montréal Canada

Department Environment Forest and Nature Lab Campus Gontrode Ghent University Melle Gontrode Belgium

Department Forest Nature and Landscape KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

Department of Biology McGill University Montréal Québec Canada

Department of Community Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ Halle Germany

Department of Crop Production Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden

Department of Ecology Evolution and Behavior University of Minnesota St Paul Minnesota USA

Department of Ecosystem Management Climate and Biodiversity Institute of Forest Ecology University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Austria

Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management Mendel University Brno Czech republic

Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota St Paul Minnesota USA

Department of Plant Ecology Technical University of Berlin Berlin Germany

Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

Eco and Sols Univ Montpellier CIRAD INRAE Institut Agro IRD Montpellier France

Forest Science Department University of São Paulo ESALQ Piracicaba Brazil

Foundation Euro Mediterranean Center on Climate Change Sassari Italy

geo konzept society for environmental planning systems mbH Adelschlag Germany

Geobotany Faculty of Biology University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle Jena Leipzig Leipzig Germany

Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia

INRAE BIOGECO Cestas France

INRAE Ecologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes Avignon France

Institute for Global Change Biology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

Institute of Biology Leipzig University Leipzig Germany

National Biodiversity Future Center Palermo Italy

National Research Council Institute of Bioeconomy Sassari Italy

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Sault Ste Marie Ontario Canada

re green Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

School of Environmental and Conservation Sciences Murdoch University Murdoch Western Australia Australia

Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Edgewater Maryland USA

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Forest GEO Panama City Panama

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute ForestGEO Agua Salud Project Panama City Panama

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Panama City Panama

Soil Science Faculty of Agriculture Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Rostock Rostock Germany

Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Alnarp Sweden

The UWA Institute of Agriculture The University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia

Tropical Silviculture and Forest Ecology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany

UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Environment Centre Wales Bangor UK

Université catholique de Louvain Earth and Life Institute Environmental Sciences Louvain la Neuve Belgium

University of Bordeaux INRAE BIOGECO Cestas France

USDA Forest Service Human Dimensions Fort Collins Colorado USA

West Virginia University Morgantown West Virginia USA

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Abbass, K. , Qasim M. Z., Song H., Murshed M., Mahmood H., and Younis I.. 2022. “A Review of the Global Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation, and Sustainable Mitigation Measures.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29, no. 28: 42539–42559. 10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Ali, A. , Yan E.‐R., Chen H. Y. H., et al. 2016. “Stand Structural Diversity Rather Than Species Diversity Enhances Aboveground Carbon Storage in Secondary Subtropical Forests in Eastern China.” Biogeosciences 13, no. 16: 4627–4635. 10.5194/bg-13-4627-2016. DOI

Babst, F. , Bouriaud O., Alexander R., Trouet V., and Frank D.. 2014. “Toward Consistent Measurements of Carbon Accumulation: A Multi‐Site Assessment of Biomass and Basal Area Increment Across Europe.” Dendrochronologia 32, no. 2: 153–161. 10.1016/j.dendro.2014.01.002. DOI

Baeten, L. , Bruelheide H., van der Plas F., et al. 2019. “Identifying the Tree Species Compositions That Maximize Ecosystem Functioning in European Forests.” Journal of Applied Ecology 56, no. 3: 733–744. 10.1111/1365-2664.13308. DOI

Bauhus, J. , Forrester D. I., Gardiner B., Jactel H., Vallejo R., and Pretzsch H.. 2017. “Ecological Stability of Mixed‐Species Forests.” In Mixed‐Species Forests: Ecology and Management, edited by Pretzsch H., Forrester D. I., and Bauhus J., 337–382. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-662-54553-9_7. DOI

Belluau, M. , Vitali V., Parker W. C., Paquette A., and Messier C.. 2021. “Overyielding in Young Tree Communities Does Not Support the Stress‐Gradient Hypothesis and Is Favoured by Functional Diversity and Higher Water Availability.” Journal of Ecology 109, no. 4: 1790–1803. 10.1111/1365-2745.13602. DOI

Blondeel, H. , Guillemot J., Martin‐StPaul N., et al. 2024. “Tree Diversity Reduces Variability in Sapling Survival Under Drought.” Journal of Ecology 112, no. 5: 1164–1180. 10.1111/1365-2745.14294. DOI

Bonan, G. B. 2008. “Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests.” Science 320, no. 5882: 1444–1449. 10.1126/science.1155121. PubMed DOI

Bongers, F. J. , Schmid B., Bruelheide H., et al. 2021. “Functional Diversity Effects on Productivity Increase With Age in a Forest Biodiversity Experiment.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 5, no. 12: Article 12. 10.1038/s41559-021-01564-3. PubMed DOI

Brooks, M. E. , Kristensen K., Benthem K. J., et al. 2017. “glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero‐Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling.” R Journal 9, no. 2: 378. 10.32614/RJ-2017-066. DOI

Chamagne, J. , Tanadini M., Frank D., et al. 2017. “Forest Diversity Promotes Individual Tree Growth in Central European Forest Stands.” Journal of Applied Ecology 54, no. 1: 71–79. 10.1111/1365-2664.12783. DOI

Chave, J. , Coomes D., Jansen S., Lewis S. L., Swenson N. G., and Zanne A. E.. 2009. “Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum.” Ecology Letters 12, no. 4: 351–366. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x. PubMed DOI

Chesson, P. 2000. “Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 31, no. 1: 343–366. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343. DOI

Condés, S. , Pretzsch H., and del Río M.. 2023. “Species Admixture Can Increase Potential Tree Growth and Reduce Competition.” Forest Ecology and Management 539: 120997. 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120997. DOI

Depauw, L. , De Lombaerde E., Dhiedt E., et al. 2024. “Enhancing Tree Performance Through Species Mixing: Review of a Quarter‐Century of TreeDivNet Experiments Reveals Research Gaps and Practical Insights.” Current Forestry Reports 10, no. 1: 1–20. 10.1007/s40725-023-00208-y. DOI

Díaz, S. , Kattge J., Cornelissen J. H. C., et al. 2016. “The Global Spectrum of Plant Form and Function.” Nature 529, no. 7585: 167–171. 10.1038/nature16489. PubMed DOI

Dolezal, J. , Fibich P., Altman J., et al. 2020. “Determinants of Ecosystem Stability in a Diverse Temperate Forest.” Oikos 129, no. 11: 1692–1703. 10.1111/oik.07379. DOI

Dolezal, J. , Fibich P., Altman J., Takahashi K., and Hara T.. 2024. “Diversity Effects and Compensatory Dynamics Drive Productivity and Stability in Temperate Old‐Growth Forests.” Journal of Ecology 112, no. 10: 2249–2263. 10.1111/1365-2745.14391. DOI

Dormann, C. F. , Schneider H., and Gorges J.. 2019. “Neither Global nor Consistent: A Technical Comment on the Tree Diversity‐Productivity Analysis of Liang et al. (2016).” bioRxiv. 10.1101/524363. DOI

Fahey, C. , Choi D., Wang J., et al. 2025. “Canopy Complexity Drives Positive Effects of Tree Diversity on Productivity in Two Tree Diversity Experiments.” Ecology 106, no. 1: e4500. 10.1002/ecy.4500. PubMed DOI

Felton, A. , Seidl R., Lindenmayer D. B., et al. 2024. “The Choice of Path to Resilience Is Crucial to the Future of Production Forests.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 8: 1–3. 10.1038/s41559-024-02473-x. PubMed DOI

Finegan, B. , Peña‐Claros M., de Oliveira A., et al. 2015. “Does Functional Trait Diversity Predict Above‐Ground Biomass and Productivity of Tropical Forests? Testing Three Alternative Hypotheses.” Journal of Ecology 103, no. 1: 191–201. 10.1111/1365-2745.12346. DOI

Forrester, D. I. 2019. “Linking Forest Growth With Stand Structure: Tree Size Inequality, Tree Growth or Resource Partitioning and the Asymmetry of Competition.” Forest Ecology and Management 447: 139–157. 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.053. DOI

Forrester, D. I. , and Bauhus J.. 2016. “A Review of Processes Behind Diversity—Productivity Relationships in Forests.” Current Forestry Reports 2, no. 1: 45–61. 10.1007/s40725-016-0031-2. DOI

Gamfeldt, L. , Snäll T., Bagchi R., et al. 2013. “Higher Levels of Multiple Ecosystem Services Are Found in Forests With More Tree Species.” Nature Communications 4, no. 1: 1340. 10.1038/ncomms2328. PubMed DOI PMC

Gayer, K. 1886. “Der gemischte Wald – Seine Begründung und Pflege, insbesondere durch Horst‐und Gruppenwirtschaft.”

Gini, C. 1912. Variabilità e mutabilità: Contributo allo studio delle distribuzioni e delle relazioni statistiche [Fasc. I.]. Tipogr. di P. Cuppini.

Grossman, J. J. , Cavender‐Bares J., Hobbie S. E., Reich P. B., and Montgomery R. A.. 2017. “Species Richness and Traits Predict Overyielding in Stem Growth in an Early‐Successional Tree Diversity Experiment.” Ecology 98, no. 10: 2601–2614. 10.1002/ecy.1958. PubMed DOI

Guillemot, J. , Martin‐StPaul N. K., Bulascoschi L., et al. 2022. “Small and Slow Is Safe: On the Drought Tolerance of Tropical Tree Species.” Global Change Biology 28, no. 8: 2622–2638. PubMed

Hlásny, T. , König L., Krokene P., et al. 2021. “Bark Beetle Outbreaks in Europe: State of Knowledge and Ways Forward for Management.” Current Forestry Reports 7, no. 3: 138–165. 10.1007/s40725-021-00142-x. DOI

Huuskonen, S. , Domisch T., Finér L., et al. 2021. “What Is the Potential for Replacing Monocultures With Mixed‐Species Stands to Enhance Ecosystem Services in Boreal Forests in Fennoscandia?” Forest Ecology and Management 479: 118558. 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118558. DOI

IPCC . 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by Masson‐Delmotte V., Zhai P., Pirani A., et al. Cambridge University Press.

Jactel, H. , Bauhus J., Boberg J., et al. 2017. “Tree Diversity Drives Forest Stand Resistance to Natural Disturbances.” Current Forestry Reports 3, no. 3: 223–243.

Jactel, H. , Gritti E. S., Drössler L., et al. 2018. “Positive Biodiversity–Productivity Relationships in Forests: Climate Matters.” Biology Letters 14, no. 4: 20170747. 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0747. PubMed DOI PMC

Jactel, H. , Koricheva J., and Castagneyrol B.. 2019. “Responses of Forest Insect Pests to Climate Change: Not So Simple.” Current Opinion in Insect Science 35: 103–108. 10.1016/j.cois.2019.07.010. PubMed DOI

Jucker, T. , Bouriaud O., and Coomes D. A.. 2015. “Crown Plasticity Enables Trees to Optimize Canopy Packing in Mixed‐Species Forests.” Functional Ecology 29, no. 8: 1078–1086. 10.1111/1365-2435.12428. DOI

Jucker, T. , Koricheva J., Finér L., Bouriaud O., Iacopetti G., and Coomes D. A.. 2020. “Good Things Take Time—Diversity Effects on Tree Growth Shift From Negative to Positive During Stand Development in Boreal Forests.” Journal of Ecology 108, no. 6: 2198–2211. 10.1111/1365-2745.13464. DOI

Kattge, J. , Díaz S., Lavorel S., et al. 2011. “TRY – A Global Database of Plant Traits.” Global Change Biology 17, no. 9: 2905–2935. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x. DOI

Koricheva, J. , Barton K. E., Felix J. A., et al. 2025. “Using Long‐Term Tree Diversity Experiments to Explore the Mechanisms of Temporal Shifts in Forest Ecosystem Functioning.” Oikos 2025, no. 4: e10872. 10.1111/oik.10872. DOI

Kunstler, G. , Lavergne S., Courbaud B., et al. 2012. “Competitive Interactions Between Forest Trees Are Driven by Species' Trait Hierarchy, Not Phylogenetic or Functional Similarity: Implications for Forest Community Assembly.” Ecology Letters 15, no. 8: 831–840. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01803.x. PubMed DOI PMC

Laliberté, E. , and Legendre P.. 2010. “A Distance‐Based Framework for Measuring Functional Diversity From Multiple Traits.” Ecology 91, no. 1: 299–305. 10.1890/08-2244.1. PubMed DOI

Lambers, H. , Chapin F. S., and Pons T. L.. 2008. Plant Physiological Ecology. Vol. 2. Springer.

Lefcheck, J. S. 2016. “piecewiseSEM: Piecewise Structural Equation Modelling in r for Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7, no. 5: 573–579. 10.1111/2041-210X.12512. DOI

Liang, J. , Buongiorno J., Monserud R. A., Kruger E. L., and Zhou M.. 2007. “Effects of Diversity of Tree Species and Size on Forest Basal Area Growth, Recruitment, and Mortality.” Forest Ecology and Management 243, no. 1: 116–127. 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.02.028. DOI

Lohbeck, M. , Poorter L., Lebrija‐Trejos E., et al. 2013. “Successional Changes in Functional Composition Contrast for Dry and Wet Tropical Forest.” Ecology 94, no. 6: 1211–1216. 10.1890/12-1850.1. PubMed DOI

Loreau, M. , and Hector A.. 2001. “Partitioning Selection and Complementarity in Biodiversity Experiments.” Nature 412, no. 6842: 72–76. 10.1038/35083573. PubMed DOI

Lüdecke, D. , Ben‐Shachar M., Patil I., Waggoner P., and Makowski D.. 2021. “Performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models.” Journal of Open Source Software 6, no. 60: 3139. 10.21105/joss.03139. DOI

Luu, T. C. , Binkley D., and Stape J. L.. 2013. “Neighborhood Uniformity Increases Growth of Individual Eucalyptus Trees.” Forest Ecology and Management 289: 90–97. 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.033. DOI

MacArthur, R. 1970. “Species Packing and Competitive Equilibrium for Many Species.” Theoretical Population Biology 1, no. 1: 1–11. 10.1016/0040-5809(70)90039-0. PubMed DOI

MacLaren, C. , Waswa W., Aliyu K. T., et al. 2023. “Predicting Intercrop Competition, Facilitation, and Productivity From Simple Functional Traits.” Field Crops Research 297: 108926. 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108926. DOI

Messier, C. , Bauhus J., Doyon F., et al. 2019. “The Functional Complex Network Approach to Foster Forest Resilience to Global Changes.” Forest Ecosystems 6, no. 1: 21. 10.1186/s40663-019-0166-2. DOI

Messier, C. , Bauhus J., Sousa‐Silva R., et al. 2021. “For the Sake of Resilience and Multifunctionality, Let's Diversify Planted Forests!” Conservation Letters 15: e12829.

Methorst, J. , Rehdanz K., Mueller T., Hansjürgens B., Bonn A., and Böhning‐Gaese K.. 2021. “The Importance of Species Diversity for Human Well‐Being in Europe.” Ecological Economics 181: 106917. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106917. DOI

Möller, A. 1922. Der dauerwaldgedanke: Sein sinn und seine bedeutung. Springer.

Nadrowski, K. , Wirth C., and Scherer‐Lorenzen M.. 2010. “Is Forest Diversity Driving Ecosystem Function and Service?” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2, no. 1: 75–79. 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.003. DOI

Oksanen, J. , Blanchet F. G., Kindt R., et al. 2013. “Package ‘vegan’.” Community Ecology Package, Version, 2(9), 1–295.

Paquette, A. , Vayreda J., Coll L., Messier C., and Retana J.. 2018. “Climate Change Could Negate Positive Tree Diversity Effects on Forest Productivity: A Study Across Five Climate Types in Spain and Canada.” Ecosystems 21, no. 5: 960–970. 10.1007/s10021-017-0196-y. DOI

Pardos, M. , del Río M., Pretzsch H., et al. 2021. “The Greater Resilience of Mixed Forests to Drought Mainly Depends on Their Composition: Analysis Along a Climate Gradient Across Europe.” Forest Ecology and Management 481: 118687. 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118687. DOI

Poorter, L. , and Bongers F.. 2006. “Leaf Traits Are Good Predictors of Plant Performance Across 53 Rain Forest Species.” Ecology 87, no. 7: 1733–1743. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1733:LTAGPO]2.0.CO;2. PubMed DOI

Poorter, L. , Wright S. J., Paz H., et al. 2008. “Are Functional Traits Good Predictors of Demographic Rates? Evidence From Five Neotropical Forests.” Ecology 89, no. 7: 1908–1920. 10.1890/07-0207.1. PubMed DOI

Pretzsch, H. 2014. “Canopy Space Filling and Tree Crown Morphology in Mixed‐Species Stands Compared With Monocultures.” Forest Ecology and Management 327: 251–264. 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.027. DOI

Pretzsch, H. , and Hilmers T.. 2024. “Structural Diversity and Carbon Stock of Forest Stands: Tradeoff as Modified by Silvicultural Thinning.” European Journal of Forest Research 144: 775–796. 10.1007/s10342-024-01691-z. DOI

R Core Team . 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R‐project.org/.

Ratcliffe, S. , Wirth C., Jucker T., et al. 2017. “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning Relations in European Forests Depend on Environmental Context.” Ecology Letters 20, no. 11: 1414–1426. 10.1111/ele.12849. PubMed DOI

Ray, T. , Delory B. M., Beugnon R., et al. 2023. “Tree Diversity Increases Productivity Through Enhancing Structural Complexity Across Mycorrhizal Types.” Science Advances 9, no. 40: eadi2362. 10.1126/sciadv.adi2362. PubMed DOI PMC

Reich, P. B. 2014. “The World‐Wide ‘Fast–Slow’ Plant Economics Spectrum: A Traits Manifesto.” Journal of Ecology 102, no. 2: 275–301. 10.1111/1365-2745.12211. DOI

Reich, P. B. , Tilman D., Isbell F., et al. 2012. “Impacts of Biodiversity Loss Escalate Through Time as Redundancy Fades.” Science 336: 589–592. 10.1126/science.1217909. PubMed DOI

Rissanen, K. , Martin‐Guay M.‐O., Riopel‐Bouvier A.‐S., and Paquette A.. 2019. “Light Interception in Experimental Forests Affected by Tree Diversity and Structural Complexity of Dominant Canopy.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 278: 107655. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107655. DOI

Roscher, C. , Schumacher J., Gubsch M., et al. 2012. “Using Plant Functional Traits to Explain Diversity–Productivity Relationships.” PLoS One 7, no. 5: e36760. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036760. PubMed DOI PMC

Rozario, K. , Oh R. R. Y., Marselle M., et al. 2024. “The More the Merrier? Perceived Forest Biodiversity Promotes Short‐Term Mental Health and Well‐Being—A Multicentre Study.” People and Nature 6, no. 1: 180–201. 10.1002/pan3.10564. DOI

Sanaei, A. , Ali A., Yuan Z., et al. 2021. “Context‐Dependency of Tree Species Diversity, Trait Composition and Stand Structural Attributes Regulate Temperate Forest Multifunctionality.” Science of the Total Environment 757: 143724. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143724. PubMed DOI

Sapijanskas, J. , Paquette A., Potvin C., Kunert N., and Loreau M.. 2014. “Tropical Tree Diversity Enhances Light Capture Through Crown Plasticity and Spatial and Temporal Niche Differences.” Ecology 95, no. 9: 2479–2492. 10.1890/13-1366.1. DOI

Scherer‐Lorenzen, M. , Schulze E.‐D., Don A., Schumacher J., and Weller E.. 2007. “Exploring the Functional Significance of Forest Diversity: A New Long‐Term Experiment With Temperate Tree Species (BIOTREE).” Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 9, no. 2: 53–70. 10.1016/j.ppees.2007.08.002. DOI

Schnabel, F. , Liu X., Kunz M., et al. 2021. “Species Richness Stabilizes Productivity via Asynchrony and Drought‐Tolerance Diversity in a Large‐Scale Tree Biodiversity Experiment.” Science Advances 7, no. 51: eabk1643. 10.1126/sciadv.abk1643. PubMed DOI PMC

Schnabel, F. , Schwarz J. A., Dănescu A., et al. 2019. “Drivers of Productivity and Its Temporal Stability in a Tropical Tree Diversity Experiment.” Global Change Biology 25, no. 12: 4257–4272. 10.1111/gcb.14792. PubMed DOI

Sinacore, K. , García E. H., Howard T., et al. 2023. “Towards Effective Reforestation: Growth and Commercial Value of Four Commonly Planted Tropical Timber Species on Infertile Soils in Panama.” New Forests 54, no. 1: 125–142. 10.1007/s11056-022-09906-0. DOI

Steckel, M. , del Río M., Heym M., et al. 2020. “Species Mixing Reduces Drought Susceptibility of Scots Pine ( DOI

Swenson, N. G. , and Enquist B. J.. 2007. “Ecological and Evolutionary Determinants of a Key Plant Functional Trait: Wood Density and Its Community‐Wide Variation Across Latitude and Elevation.” American Journal of Botany 94, no. 3: 451–459. 10.3732/ajb.94.3.451. PubMed DOI

Tobner, C. M. , Paquette A., Gravel D., Reich P. B., Williams L. J., and Messier C.. 2016. “Functional Identity Is the Main Driver of Diversity Effects in Young Tree Communities.” Ecology Letters 19, no. 6: 638–647. 10.1111/ele.12600. PubMed DOI

Toïgo, M. , Castagneyrol B., Jactel H., Morin X., and Meredieu C.. 2022. “Effects of Tree Mixture on Forest Productivity: Tree Species Addition Versus Substitution.” European Journal of Forest Research 141, no. 1: 165–175. 10.1007/s10342-021-01432-6. DOI

Turnbull, L. A. , Isbell F., Purves D. W., Loreau M., and Hector A.. 2016. “Understanding the Value of Plant Diversity for Ecosystem Functioning Through Niche Theory.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283, no. 1844: 20160536. 10.1098/rspb.2016.0536. PubMed DOI PMC

Urgoiti, J. , Messier C., Keeton W. S., Belluau M., and Paquette A.. 2023. “Functional Diversity and Identity Influence the Self‐Thinning Process in Young Forest Communities.” Journal of Ecology 111, no. 9: 2010–2022. 10.1111/1365-2745.14158. DOI

Urgoiti, J. , Messier C., Keeton W. S., Reich P. B., Gravel D., and Paquette A.. 2022. “No Complementarity no Gain—Net Diversity Effects on Tree Productivity Occur Once Complementarity Emerges During Early Stand Development.” Ecology Letters 25, no. 4: 851–862. 10.1111/ele.13959. PubMed DOI

Verheyen, K. , Vanhellemont M., Auge H., et al. 2016. “Contributions of a Global Network of Tree Diversity Experiments to Sustainable Forest Plantations.” Ambio 45, no. 1: 29–41. 10.1007/s13280-015-0685-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Westoby, M. , Falster D. S., Moles A. T., Vesk P. A., and Wright I. J.. 2002. “Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 33 (Volume 33, 2002): 125–159. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452. DOI

Williams, L. J. , Butler E. E., Cavender‐Bares J., et al. 2021. “Enhanced Light Interception and Light Use Efficiency Explain Overyielding in Young Tree Communities.” Ecology Letters 24, no. 5: 996–1006. 10.1111/ele.13717. PubMed DOI

Williams, L. J. , Cavender‐Bares J., Paquette A., Messier C., and Reich P. B.. 2020. “Light Mediates the Relationship Between Community Diversity and Trait Plasticity in Functionally and Phylogenetically Diverse Tree Mixtures.” Journal of Ecology 108, no. 4: 1617–1634. 10.1111/1365-2745.13346. DOI

Williams, L. J. , Paquette A., Cavender‐Bares J., Messier C., and Reich P. B.. 2017. “Spatial Complementarity in Tree Crowns Explains Overyielding in Species Mixtures.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, no. 4: 1–7. 10.1038/s41559-016-0063. PubMed DOI

Wright, I. J. , Reich P. B., Westoby M., et al. 2004. “The Worldwide Leaf Economics Spectrum.” Nature 428: 6985. 10.1038/nature02403. PubMed DOI

Wright, S. J. , Kitajima K., Kraft N. J. B., et al. 2010. “Functional Traits and the Growth–Mortality Trade‐Off in Tropical Trees.” Ecology 91, no. 12: Article 12. 10.1890/09-2335.1. PubMed DOI

Wright, S. J. , Muller‐Landau H. C., Condit R., and Hubbell S. P.. 2003. “Gap‐Dependent Recruitment, Realized Vital Rates, and Size Distributions of Tropical Trees.” Ecology 84, no. 12: 3174–3185. 10.1890/02-0038. DOI

Zhang, Y. , Chen H. Y. H., and Reich P. B.. 2012. “Forest Productivity Increases With Evenness, Species Richness and Trait Variation: A Global Meta‐Analysis.” Journal of Ecology 100, no. 3: 742–749. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01944.x. DOI

Zheng, L. , Barry K. E., Guerrero‐Ramírez N. R., et al. 2024. “Effects of Plant Diversity on Productivity Strengthen Over Time due to Trait‐Dependent Shifts in Species Overyielding.” Nature Communications 15, no. 1: 2078. 10.1038/s41467-024-46355-z. PubMed DOI PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...