Diversity in Resource Use Strategies Promotes Productivity in Young Planted Tree Species Mixtures
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
ANR-20-EBI5-0003
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
BELSPO
451394862
DFG
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
FZT 118
DFG
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
202548816
DFG
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
Ei 862/29-1
DFG
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
532776526
DFG
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
2019/24318-6
FAPESP
2020/15230-5
FAPESP
2021/10573-4
FAPESP
BA 1494/9-1
FAPESP
22047-5
Shell Brazil
I 5086-B
FWF
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
2020-02339
Swedish Research Council Formas
NSF-DBI-2021898
National Science Foundation ASCEND Biology Integration Institute
Climate & Biodiversity Initiative of the BNP Paribas Foundation
Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Württemberg
European Social Fund
Walloon forest service (SPW-DNF)
2106014
NSF
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
2044406
NSF
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
2019-02007
Formas
2021-02132
Formas
10106348
Horizon Europe Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action
National Forest Company
090316 016-FR MULTIFOR
the Forestry Commission and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund ERDF)
USDA Forest Service
Australian Research Council
101087262
European Union's Horizon
National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP)
CN_00000033
European Union- NextGenerationEU
CUP J83C22000870007
European Union- NextGenerationEU
University of Freiburg, Germany
Federal Forestry Office Thüringer Wald
PubMed
41013876
PubMed Central
PMC12475536
DOI
10.1111/gcb.70493
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- TreeDivNet, climate change mitigation, complementarity effects, forest management, functional traits, mixed‐species forest plantations, selection effects, tree species richness,
- MeSH
- biodiverzita * MeSH
- lesnictví * metody MeSH
- lesy * MeSH
- stromy * růst a vývoj fyziologie MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Mixed-species forestry is a promising approach to enhance productivity, increase carbon sequestration, and mitigate climate change. Diverse forests, composed of species with varying structures and functional trait profiles, may have higher functional and structural diversity, which are attributes relevant to a number of mechanisms that can influence productivity. However, it remains unclear whether the context-dependent roles of functional identity, functional diversity, and structural diversity can lead to a generalized understanding of tree diversity effects on stand productivity. To address these gaps, we analyzed growth data from 83,600 trees from 89 species across 21 young tree diversity experiments spanning five continents and three biomes. Results revealed a positive saturating relationship between tree species richness and stand productivity, with reduced variability in growth rates among more diverse stands. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that functional diversity mediated the positive effects of species richness on productivity. We additionally report a negative relationship between structural diversity and productivity, which decreased with increasing species richness. When partitioning net diversity effects, we found that selection effects played a dominant role in driving the overall increase in productivity in these predominantly young stands, contributing 77% of the net diversity effect. Selection effects increased with diversity in wood density. Furthermore, acquisitive species with lower wood density and higher leaf nitrogen content had higher productivity in more diverse stands, while conservative species showed neutral to slightly negative responses to species mixing. Together, these results suggest that combining acquisitive with conservative species allows acquisitive species to drive positive selection effects while conservative species tolerate competition. Thus, contrasting resource-use strategies can enhance productivity to optimize mixed-species forestry, with potential for both ecological and economic benefits.
Biodiversity Macroecology and Biogeography University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany
Centre for Forest Management Forest Research Alice Holt Lodge Farnham Surrey UK
CIRAD UMR Eco and Sols Montpellier France
College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin Stevens Point Stevens Point Wisconsin USA
Département des sciences biologiques Université du Québec à Montréal Montréal Canada
Department Environment Forest and Nature Lab Campus Gontrode Ghent University Melle Gontrode Belgium
Department Forest Nature and Landscape KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
Department of Biology McGill University Montréal Québec Canada
Department of Community Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ Halle Germany
Department of Crop Production Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
Department of Ecology Evolution and Behavior University of Minnesota St Paul Minnesota USA
Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management Mendel University Brno Czech republic
Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota St Paul Minnesota USA
Department of Plant Ecology Technical University of Berlin Berlin Germany
Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
Eco and Sols Univ Montpellier CIRAD INRAE Institut Agro IRD Montpellier France
Forest Science Department University of São Paulo ESALQ Piracicaba Brazil
Foundation Euro Mediterranean Center on Climate Change Sassari Italy
geo konzept society for environmental planning systems mbH Adelschlag Germany
Geobotany Faculty of Biology University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle Jena Leipzig Leipzig Germany
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia
INRAE Ecologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes Avignon France
Institute for Global Change Biology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
Institute of Biology Leipzig University Leipzig Germany
National Biodiversity Future Center Palermo Italy
National Research Council Institute of Bioeconomy Sassari Italy
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Sault Ste Marie Ontario Canada
re green Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Edgewater Maryland USA
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Forest GEO Panama City Panama
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute ForestGEO Agua Salud Project Panama City Panama
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Panama City Panama
Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Alnarp Sweden
Tropical Silviculture and Forest Ecology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany
UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Environment Centre Wales Bangor UK
University of Bordeaux INRAE BIOGECO Cestas France
USDA Forest Service Human Dimensions Fort Collins Colorado USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Abbass, K. , Qasim M. Z., Song H., Murshed M., Mahmood H., and Younis I.. 2022. “A Review of the Global Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation, and Sustainable Mitigation Measures.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29, no. 28: 42539–42559. 10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Ali, A. , Yan E.‐R., Chen H. Y. H., et al. 2016. “Stand Structural Diversity Rather Than Species Diversity Enhances Aboveground Carbon Storage in Secondary Subtropical Forests in Eastern China.” Biogeosciences 13, no. 16: 4627–4635. 10.5194/bg-13-4627-2016. DOI
Babst, F. , Bouriaud O., Alexander R., Trouet V., and Frank D.. 2014. “Toward Consistent Measurements of Carbon Accumulation: A Multi‐Site Assessment of Biomass and Basal Area Increment Across Europe.” Dendrochronologia 32, no. 2: 153–161. 10.1016/j.dendro.2014.01.002. DOI
Baeten, L. , Bruelheide H., van der Plas F., et al. 2019. “Identifying the Tree Species Compositions That Maximize Ecosystem Functioning in European Forests.” Journal of Applied Ecology 56, no. 3: 733–744. 10.1111/1365-2664.13308. DOI
Bauhus, J. , Forrester D. I., Gardiner B., Jactel H., Vallejo R., and Pretzsch H.. 2017. “Ecological Stability of Mixed‐Species Forests.” In Mixed‐Species Forests: Ecology and Management, edited by Pretzsch H., Forrester D. I., and Bauhus J., 337–382. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-662-54553-9_7. DOI
Belluau, M. , Vitali V., Parker W. C., Paquette A., and Messier C.. 2021. “Overyielding in Young Tree Communities Does Not Support the Stress‐Gradient Hypothesis and Is Favoured by Functional Diversity and Higher Water Availability.” Journal of Ecology 109, no. 4: 1790–1803. 10.1111/1365-2745.13602. DOI
Blondeel, H. , Guillemot J., Martin‐StPaul N., et al. 2024. “Tree Diversity Reduces Variability in Sapling Survival Under Drought.” Journal of Ecology 112, no. 5: 1164–1180. 10.1111/1365-2745.14294. DOI
Bonan, G. B. 2008. “Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests.” Science 320, no. 5882: 1444–1449. 10.1126/science.1155121. PubMed DOI
Bongers, F. J. , Schmid B., Bruelheide H., et al. 2021. “Functional Diversity Effects on Productivity Increase With Age in a Forest Biodiversity Experiment.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 5, no. 12: Article 12. 10.1038/s41559-021-01564-3. PubMed DOI
Brooks, M. E. , Kristensen K., Benthem K. J., et al. 2017. “glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero‐Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling.” R Journal 9, no. 2: 378. 10.32614/RJ-2017-066. DOI
Chamagne, J. , Tanadini M., Frank D., et al. 2017. “Forest Diversity Promotes Individual Tree Growth in Central European Forest Stands.” Journal of Applied Ecology 54, no. 1: 71–79. 10.1111/1365-2664.12783. DOI
Chave, J. , Coomes D., Jansen S., Lewis S. L., Swenson N. G., and Zanne A. E.. 2009. “Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum.” Ecology Letters 12, no. 4: 351–366. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x. PubMed DOI
Chesson, P. 2000. “Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 31, no. 1: 343–366. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343. DOI
Condés, S. , Pretzsch H., and del Río M.. 2023. “Species Admixture Can Increase Potential Tree Growth and Reduce Competition.” Forest Ecology and Management 539: 120997. 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120997. DOI
Depauw, L. , De Lombaerde E., Dhiedt E., et al. 2024. “Enhancing Tree Performance Through Species Mixing: Review of a Quarter‐Century of TreeDivNet Experiments Reveals Research Gaps and Practical Insights.” Current Forestry Reports 10, no. 1: 1–20. 10.1007/s40725-023-00208-y. DOI
Díaz, S. , Kattge J., Cornelissen J. H. C., et al. 2016. “The Global Spectrum of Plant Form and Function.” Nature 529, no. 7585: 167–171. 10.1038/nature16489. PubMed DOI
Dolezal, J. , Fibich P., Altman J., et al. 2020. “Determinants of Ecosystem Stability in a Diverse Temperate Forest.” Oikos 129, no. 11: 1692–1703. 10.1111/oik.07379. DOI
Dolezal, J. , Fibich P., Altman J., Takahashi K., and Hara T.. 2024. “Diversity Effects and Compensatory Dynamics Drive Productivity and Stability in Temperate Old‐Growth Forests.” Journal of Ecology 112, no. 10: 2249–2263. 10.1111/1365-2745.14391. DOI
Dormann, C. F. , Schneider H., and Gorges J.. 2019. “Neither Global nor Consistent: A Technical Comment on the Tree Diversity‐Productivity Analysis of Liang et al. (2016).” bioRxiv. 10.1101/524363. DOI
Fahey, C. , Choi D., Wang J., et al. 2025. “Canopy Complexity Drives Positive Effects of Tree Diversity on Productivity in Two Tree Diversity Experiments.” Ecology 106, no. 1: e4500. 10.1002/ecy.4500. PubMed DOI
Felton, A. , Seidl R., Lindenmayer D. B., et al. 2024. “The Choice of Path to Resilience Is Crucial to the Future of Production Forests.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 8: 1–3. 10.1038/s41559-024-02473-x. PubMed DOI
Finegan, B. , Peña‐Claros M., de Oliveira A., et al. 2015. “Does Functional Trait Diversity Predict Above‐Ground Biomass and Productivity of Tropical Forests? Testing Three Alternative Hypotheses.” Journal of Ecology 103, no. 1: 191–201. 10.1111/1365-2745.12346. DOI
Forrester, D. I. 2019. “Linking Forest Growth With Stand Structure: Tree Size Inequality, Tree Growth or Resource Partitioning and the Asymmetry of Competition.” Forest Ecology and Management 447: 139–157. 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.053. DOI
Forrester, D. I. , and Bauhus J.. 2016. “A Review of Processes Behind Diversity—Productivity Relationships in Forests.” Current Forestry Reports 2, no. 1: 45–61. 10.1007/s40725-016-0031-2. DOI
Gamfeldt, L. , Snäll T., Bagchi R., et al. 2013. “Higher Levels of Multiple Ecosystem Services Are Found in Forests With More Tree Species.” Nature Communications 4, no. 1: 1340. 10.1038/ncomms2328. PubMed DOI PMC
Gayer, K. 1886. “Der gemischte Wald – Seine Begründung und Pflege, insbesondere durch Horst‐und Gruppenwirtschaft.”
Gini, C. 1912. Variabilità e mutabilità: Contributo allo studio delle distribuzioni e delle relazioni statistiche [Fasc. I.]. Tipogr. di P. Cuppini.
Grossman, J. J. , Cavender‐Bares J., Hobbie S. E., Reich P. B., and Montgomery R. A.. 2017. “Species Richness and Traits Predict Overyielding in Stem Growth in an Early‐Successional Tree Diversity Experiment.” Ecology 98, no. 10: 2601–2614. 10.1002/ecy.1958. PubMed DOI
Guillemot, J. , Martin‐StPaul N. K., Bulascoschi L., et al. 2022. “Small and Slow Is Safe: On the Drought Tolerance of Tropical Tree Species.” Global Change Biology 28, no. 8: 2622–2638. PubMed
Hlásny, T. , König L., Krokene P., et al. 2021. “Bark Beetle Outbreaks in Europe: State of Knowledge and Ways Forward for Management.” Current Forestry Reports 7, no. 3: 138–165. 10.1007/s40725-021-00142-x. DOI
Huuskonen, S. , Domisch T., Finér L., et al. 2021. “What Is the Potential for Replacing Monocultures With Mixed‐Species Stands to Enhance Ecosystem Services in Boreal Forests in Fennoscandia?” Forest Ecology and Management 479: 118558. 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118558. DOI
IPCC . 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by Masson‐Delmotte V., Zhai P., Pirani A., et al. Cambridge University Press.
Jactel, H. , Bauhus J., Boberg J., et al. 2017. “Tree Diversity Drives Forest Stand Resistance to Natural Disturbances.” Current Forestry Reports 3, no. 3: 223–243.
Jactel, H. , Gritti E. S., Drössler L., et al. 2018. “Positive Biodiversity–Productivity Relationships in Forests: Climate Matters.” Biology Letters 14, no. 4: 20170747. 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0747. PubMed DOI PMC
Jactel, H. , Koricheva J., and Castagneyrol B.. 2019. “Responses of Forest Insect Pests to Climate Change: Not So Simple.” Current Opinion in Insect Science 35: 103–108. 10.1016/j.cois.2019.07.010. PubMed DOI
Jucker, T. , Bouriaud O., and Coomes D. A.. 2015. “Crown Plasticity Enables Trees to Optimize Canopy Packing in Mixed‐Species Forests.” Functional Ecology 29, no. 8: 1078–1086. 10.1111/1365-2435.12428. DOI
Jucker, T. , Koricheva J., Finér L., Bouriaud O., Iacopetti G., and Coomes D. A.. 2020. “Good Things Take Time—Diversity Effects on Tree Growth Shift From Negative to Positive During Stand Development in Boreal Forests.” Journal of Ecology 108, no. 6: 2198–2211. 10.1111/1365-2745.13464. DOI
Kattge, J. , Díaz S., Lavorel S., et al. 2011. “TRY – A Global Database of Plant Traits.” Global Change Biology 17, no. 9: 2905–2935. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x. DOI
Koricheva, J. , Barton K. E., Felix J. A., et al. 2025. “Using Long‐Term Tree Diversity Experiments to Explore the Mechanisms of Temporal Shifts in Forest Ecosystem Functioning.” Oikos 2025, no. 4: e10872. 10.1111/oik.10872. DOI
Kunstler, G. , Lavergne S., Courbaud B., et al. 2012. “Competitive Interactions Between Forest Trees Are Driven by Species' Trait Hierarchy, Not Phylogenetic or Functional Similarity: Implications for Forest Community Assembly.” Ecology Letters 15, no. 8: 831–840. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01803.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Laliberté, E. , and Legendre P.. 2010. “A Distance‐Based Framework for Measuring Functional Diversity From Multiple Traits.” Ecology 91, no. 1: 299–305. 10.1890/08-2244.1. PubMed DOI
Lambers, H. , Chapin F. S., and Pons T. L.. 2008. Plant Physiological Ecology. Vol. 2. Springer.
Lefcheck, J. S. 2016. “piecewiseSEM: Piecewise Structural Equation Modelling in r for Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7, no. 5: 573–579. 10.1111/2041-210X.12512. DOI
Liang, J. , Buongiorno J., Monserud R. A., Kruger E. L., and Zhou M.. 2007. “Effects of Diversity of Tree Species and Size on Forest Basal Area Growth, Recruitment, and Mortality.” Forest Ecology and Management 243, no. 1: 116–127. 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.02.028. DOI
Lohbeck, M. , Poorter L., Lebrija‐Trejos E., et al. 2013. “Successional Changes in Functional Composition Contrast for Dry and Wet Tropical Forest.” Ecology 94, no. 6: 1211–1216. 10.1890/12-1850.1. PubMed DOI
Loreau, M. , and Hector A.. 2001. “Partitioning Selection and Complementarity in Biodiversity Experiments.” Nature 412, no. 6842: 72–76. 10.1038/35083573. PubMed DOI
Lüdecke, D. , Ben‐Shachar M., Patil I., Waggoner P., and Makowski D.. 2021. “Performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models.” Journal of Open Source Software 6, no. 60: 3139. 10.21105/joss.03139. DOI
Luu, T. C. , Binkley D., and Stape J. L.. 2013. “Neighborhood Uniformity Increases Growth of Individual Eucalyptus Trees.” Forest Ecology and Management 289: 90–97. 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.033. DOI
MacArthur, R. 1970. “Species Packing and Competitive Equilibrium for Many Species.” Theoretical Population Biology 1, no. 1: 1–11. 10.1016/0040-5809(70)90039-0. PubMed DOI
MacLaren, C. , Waswa W., Aliyu K. T., et al. 2023. “Predicting Intercrop Competition, Facilitation, and Productivity From Simple Functional Traits.” Field Crops Research 297: 108926. 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108926. DOI
Messier, C. , Bauhus J., Doyon F., et al. 2019. “The Functional Complex Network Approach to Foster Forest Resilience to Global Changes.” Forest Ecosystems 6, no. 1: 21. 10.1186/s40663-019-0166-2. DOI
Messier, C. , Bauhus J., Sousa‐Silva R., et al. 2021. “For the Sake of Resilience and Multifunctionality, Let's Diversify Planted Forests!” Conservation Letters 15: e12829.
Methorst, J. , Rehdanz K., Mueller T., Hansjürgens B., Bonn A., and Böhning‐Gaese K.. 2021. “The Importance of Species Diversity for Human Well‐Being in Europe.” Ecological Economics 181: 106917. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106917. DOI
Möller, A. 1922. Der dauerwaldgedanke: Sein sinn und seine bedeutung. Springer.
Nadrowski, K. , Wirth C., and Scherer‐Lorenzen M.. 2010. “Is Forest Diversity Driving Ecosystem Function and Service?” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2, no. 1: 75–79. 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.003. DOI
Oksanen, J. , Blanchet F. G., Kindt R., et al. 2013. “Package ‘vegan’.” Community Ecology Package, Version, 2(9), 1–295.
Paquette, A. , Vayreda J., Coll L., Messier C., and Retana J.. 2018. “Climate Change Could Negate Positive Tree Diversity Effects on Forest Productivity: A Study Across Five Climate Types in Spain and Canada.” Ecosystems 21, no. 5: 960–970. 10.1007/s10021-017-0196-y. DOI
Pardos, M. , del Río M., Pretzsch H., et al. 2021. “The Greater Resilience of Mixed Forests to Drought Mainly Depends on Their Composition: Analysis Along a Climate Gradient Across Europe.” Forest Ecology and Management 481: 118687. 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118687. DOI
Poorter, L. , and Bongers F.. 2006. “Leaf Traits Are Good Predictors of Plant Performance Across 53 Rain Forest Species.” Ecology 87, no. 7: 1733–1743. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1733:LTAGPO]2.0.CO;2. PubMed DOI
Poorter, L. , Wright S. J., Paz H., et al. 2008. “Are Functional Traits Good Predictors of Demographic Rates? Evidence From Five Neotropical Forests.” Ecology 89, no. 7: 1908–1920. 10.1890/07-0207.1. PubMed DOI
Pretzsch, H. 2014. “Canopy Space Filling and Tree Crown Morphology in Mixed‐Species Stands Compared With Monocultures.” Forest Ecology and Management 327: 251–264. 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.027. DOI
Pretzsch, H. , and Hilmers T.. 2024. “Structural Diversity and Carbon Stock of Forest Stands: Tradeoff as Modified by Silvicultural Thinning.” European Journal of Forest Research 144: 775–796. 10.1007/s10342-024-01691-z. DOI
R Core Team . 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R‐project.org/.
Ratcliffe, S. , Wirth C., Jucker T., et al. 2017. “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning Relations in European Forests Depend on Environmental Context.” Ecology Letters 20, no. 11: 1414–1426. 10.1111/ele.12849. PubMed DOI
Ray, T. , Delory B. M., Beugnon R., et al. 2023. “Tree Diversity Increases Productivity Through Enhancing Structural Complexity Across Mycorrhizal Types.” Science Advances 9, no. 40: eadi2362. 10.1126/sciadv.adi2362. PubMed DOI PMC
Reich, P. B. 2014. “The World‐Wide ‘Fast–Slow’ Plant Economics Spectrum: A Traits Manifesto.” Journal of Ecology 102, no. 2: 275–301. 10.1111/1365-2745.12211. DOI
Reich, P. B. , Tilman D., Isbell F., et al. 2012. “Impacts of Biodiversity Loss Escalate Through Time as Redundancy Fades.” Science 336: 589–592. 10.1126/science.1217909. PubMed DOI
Rissanen, K. , Martin‐Guay M.‐O., Riopel‐Bouvier A.‐S., and Paquette A.. 2019. “Light Interception in Experimental Forests Affected by Tree Diversity and Structural Complexity of Dominant Canopy.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 278: 107655. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107655. DOI
Roscher, C. , Schumacher J., Gubsch M., et al. 2012. “Using Plant Functional Traits to Explain Diversity–Productivity Relationships.” PLoS One 7, no. 5: e36760. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036760. PubMed DOI PMC
Rozario, K. , Oh R. R. Y., Marselle M., et al. 2024. “The More the Merrier? Perceived Forest Biodiversity Promotes Short‐Term Mental Health and Well‐Being—A Multicentre Study.” People and Nature 6, no. 1: 180–201. 10.1002/pan3.10564. DOI
Sanaei, A. , Ali A., Yuan Z., et al. 2021. “Context‐Dependency of Tree Species Diversity, Trait Composition and Stand Structural Attributes Regulate Temperate Forest Multifunctionality.” Science of the Total Environment 757: 143724. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143724. PubMed DOI
Sapijanskas, J. , Paquette A., Potvin C., Kunert N., and Loreau M.. 2014. “Tropical Tree Diversity Enhances Light Capture Through Crown Plasticity and Spatial and Temporal Niche Differences.” Ecology 95, no. 9: 2479–2492. 10.1890/13-1366.1. DOI
Scherer‐Lorenzen, M. , Schulze E.‐D., Don A., Schumacher J., and Weller E.. 2007. “Exploring the Functional Significance of Forest Diversity: A New Long‐Term Experiment With Temperate Tree Species (BIOTREE).” Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 9, no. 2: 53–70. 10.1016/j.ppees.2007.08.002. DOI
Schnabel, F. , Liu X., Kunz M., et al. 2021. “Species Richness Stabilizes Productivity via Asynchrony and Drought‐Tolerance Diversity in a Large‐Scale Tree Biodiversity Experiment.” Science Advances 7, no. 51: eabk1643. 10.1126/sciadv.abk1643. PubMed DOI PMC
Schnabel, F. , Schwarz J. A., Dănescu A., et al. 2019. “Drivers of Productivity and Its Temporal Stability in a Tropical Tree Diversity Experiment.” Global Change Biology 25, no. 12: 4257–4272. 10.1111/gcb.14792. PubMed DOI
Sinacore, K. , García E. H., Howard T., et al. 2023. “Towards Effective Reforestation: Growth and Commercial Value of Four Commonly Planted Tropical Timber Species on Infertile Soils in Panama.” New Forests 54, no. 1: 125–142. 10.1007/s11056-022-09906-0. DOI
Steckel, M. , del Río M., Heym M., et al. 2020. “Species Mixing Reduces Drought Susceptibility of Scots Pine ( DOI
Swenson, N. G. , and Enquist B. J.. 2007. “Ecological and Evolutionary Determinants of a Key Plant Functional Trait: Wood Density and Its Community‐Wide Variation Across Latitude and Elevation.” American Journal of Botany 94, no. 3: 451–459. 10.3732/ajb.94.3.451. PubMed DOI
Tobner, C. M. , Paquette A., Gravel D., Reich P. B., Williams L. J., and Messier C.. 2016. “Functional Identity Is the Main Driver of Diversity Effects in Young Tree Communities.” Ecology Letters 19, no. 6: 638–647. 10.1111/ele.12600. PubMed DOI
Toïgo, M. , Castagneyrol B., Jactel H., Morin X., and Meredieu C.. 2022. “Effects of Tree Mixture on Forest Productivity: Tree Species Addition Versus Substitution.” European Journal of Forest Research 141, no. 1: 165–175. 10.1007/s10342-021-01432-6. DOI
Turnbull, L. A. , Isbell F., Purves D. W., Loreau M., and Hector A.. 2016. “Understanding the Value of Plant Diversity for Ecosystem Functioning Through Niche Theory.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283, no. 1844: 20160536. 10.1098/rspb.2016.0536. PubMed DOI PMC
Urgoiti, J. , Messier C., Keeton W. S., Belluau M., and Paquette A.. 2023. “Functional Diversity and Identity Influence the Self‐Thinning Process in Young Forest Communities.” Journal of Ecology 111, no. 9: 2010–2022. 10.1111/1365-2745.14158. DOI
Urgoiti, J. , Messier C., Keeton W. S., Reich P. B., Gravel D., and Paquette A.. 2022. “No Complementarity no Gain—Net Diversity Effects on Tree Productivity Occur Once Complementarity Emerges During Early Stand Development.” Ecology Letters 25, no. 4: 851–862. 10.1111/ele.13959. PubMed DOI
Verheyen, K. , Vanhellemont M., Auge H., et al. 2016. “Contributions of a Global Network of Tree Diversity Experiments to Sustainable Forest Plantations.” Ambio 45, no. 1: 29–41. 10.1007/s13280-015-0685-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Westoby, M. , Falster D. S., Moles A. T., Vesk P. A., and Wright I. J.. 2002. “Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 33 (Volume 33, 2002): 125–159. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452. DOI
Williams, L. J. , Butler E. E., Cavender‐Bares J., et al. 2021. “Enhanced Light Interception and Light Use Efficiency Explain Overyielding in Young Tree Communities.” Ecology Letters 24, no. 5: 996–1006. 10.1111/ele.13717. PubMed DOI
Williams, L. J. , Cavender‐Bares J., Paquette A., Messier C., and Reich P. B.. 2020. “Light Mediates the Relationship Between Community Diversity and Trait Plasticity in Functionally and Phylogenetically Diverse Tree Mixtures.” Journal of Ecology 108, no. 4: 1617–1634. 10.1111/1365-2745.13346. DOI
Williams, L. J. , Paquette A., Cavender‐Bares J., Messier C., and Reich P. B.. 2017. “Spatial Complementarity in Tree Crowns Explains Overyielding in Species Mixtures.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, no. 4: 1–7. 10.1038/s41559-016-0063. PubMed DOI
Wright, I. J. , Reich P. B., Westoby M., et al. 2004. “The Worldwide Leaf Economics Spectrum.” Nature 428: 6985. 10.1038/nature02403. PubMed DOI
Wright, S. J. , Kitajima K., Kraft N. J. B., et al. 2010. “Functional Traits and the Growth–Mortality Trade‐Off in Tropical Trees.” Ecology 91, no. 12: Article 12. 10.1890/09-2335.1. PubMed DOI
Wright, S. J. , Muller‐Landau H. C., Condit R., and Hubbell S. P.. 2003. “Gap‐Dependent Recruitment, Realized Vital Rates, and Size Distributions of Tropical Trees.” Ecology 84, no. 12: 3174–3185. 10.1890/02-0038. DOI
Zhang, Y. , Chen H. Y. H., and Reich P. B.. 2012. “Forest Productivity Increases With Evenness, Species Richness and Trait Variation: A Global Meta‐Analysis.” Journal of Ecology 100, no. 3: 742–749. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01944.x. DOI
Zheng, L. , Barry K. E., Guerrero‐Ramírez N. R., et al. 2024. “Effects of Plant Diversity on Productivity Strengthen Over Time due to Trait‐Dependent Shifts in Species Overyielding.” Nature Communications 15, no. 1: 2078. 10.1038/s41467-024-46355-z. PubMed DOI PMC