Large-scale meta-analysis and precision functional assays identify FANCM regions in which PTVs confer different risks for ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancer
Status Publisher Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
41223770
PubMed Central
PMC12657754
DOI
10.1016/j.breast.2025.104619
PII: S0960-9776(25)00636-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Breast cancer risk, CRISPR-Cas9, FANCM, Gene editing, Genetic predisposition, Meta-analysis,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The breast cancer risk conferred by germline protein truncating variants (PTVs) in known and putative breast cancer genes has been extensively investigated. However, the effect of FANCM PTVs on breast cancer risk remains unclear. Our previous clinical, genetic and functional results on the N-terminal p.Arg658∗ and the two C-terminal p.Gln1701∗ and p.Gly1906Alafs∗12 variants suggested that FANCM PTVs may confer different risks for ER-negative (ER-neg) and triple-negative (TN) breast cancer subtypes. Here, we performed meta-analyses of seven studies totaling 144 681 breast cancer cases and 123 632 controls. FANCM PTVs were tested for association with breast cancer risk overall and the disease clinical subtypes by single variant and burden analyses. Two CRISPR-Cas9-based functional assays were also conducted to test the fitness of cells after knock-in of the p.Arg658∗, p.Gln1701∗ and p.Gly1906Alafs∗12 PTVs and the sensitivity of different FANCM regions to genome editing. Our results suggest that the N-terminal FANCM region upstream of p.Tyr725 harbors essential functions, whereas downstream regions appear dispensable. This is supported by our genetic data which indicate that all FANCM PTVs, excluding the two C-terminal p.Gln1701∗ and p.Gly1906Alafs∗12, are associated with an increased risk of ER-neg (OR = 1.41, P = 0.023) and TN (OR = 1.64, P = 0.0023). Notably, PTVs upstream of AA position 670 are associated with a moderate risk of developing TN breast cancer, and that even when the p.Arg658∗ carriers were excluded from the analysis. Importantly, our results confirm previous data indicating that p.Arg658∗ carriers are at moderate risk of developing ER-neg (OR = 2.08, P = 0.030) and TN (OR = 3.26; P = 0.0034), whereas carriers of p.Gln1701∗ and p.Gly1906Alafs∗12 should not be considered at increased risk. Our data are useful for counseling carriers of FANCM PTVs, but further analyses are warranted to obtain more precise risk estimates.
Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope Duarte USA
Biotech Research and Innovation Centre University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology Department of Oncology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic Rochester USA
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Department of Medical Oncology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam the Netherlands
Department of Medical Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester USA
Department of Medical Oncology University Hospital of Heraklion Heraklion Greece
Department of Nutrition Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health Boston USA
Department of Oncology Old Road Campus Research Building University of Oxford Oxford UK
Department of Population Science American Cancer Society Atlanta USA
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Mayo Clinic Rochester USA
Department of Radiation Oncology Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
Department of Radiology University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison USA
Division of Cancer Epidemiology German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany
Epidemiology Branch National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences NIH Durham NC USA
Genome Diagnostics Program IFOM ETS the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Milan Italy
Human Genotyping Unit CeGen Spanish National Cancer Research Centre Madrid Spain
IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics Milan Italy
Intermountain Healthcare Salt Lake City UT USA
Laboratory of Hematology Oncology IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy
Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany
Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer German Cancer Research Center Lahore Pakistan
Oncólogy and Genétics Group Instituto Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur SERGAS Vigo Spain
Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia USA
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Victoria Australia
Public Health Program QIMR Berghofer Brisbane Queensland Australia
Roswell Park Cancer Center Buffalo USA
Slone Epidemiology Center Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine Boston USA
Team Exposome and Heredity CESP Gustave Roussy INSERM University Paris Saclay UVSQ Villejuif France
The University of Kansas Cancer Center Kansas City KS USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Dorling L., Carvalho S., Allen J., González-Neira A., Luccarini C. Breast cancer risk genes - association analysis in more than 113,000 women. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:428–439. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913948. et al. PubMed DOI PMC
Hu C., Hart S.N., Gnanaolivu R., Huang H., Lee K.Y., Na J., et al. A population-based study of genes previously implicated in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:440–451. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005936. PubMed DOI PMC
Foulkes W.D. The ten genes for breast (and ovarian) cancer susceptibility. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18:259–260. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00491-3. PubMed DOI
Fortuno C., Feng B.-J., Carroll C., Innella G., Kohlmann W., Lázaro C., et al. Cancer risks associated with TP53 pathogenic variants: maximum likelihood analysis of extended pedigrees for diagnosis of first cancers beyond the Li-Fraumeni syndrome spectrum. JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00453. PubMed DOI PMC
Basbous J., Constantinou A. A tumor suppressive DNA translocase named FANCM. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;54:27–40. doi: 10.1080/10409238.2019.1568963. PubMed DOI
Abbouche L., Bythell-Douglas R., Deans A.J. FANCM branchpoint translocase: master of traverse, reverse and adverse DNA repair. DNA Repair. 2024;140 doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103701. PubMed DOI
Gracia-Aznarez F.J., Fernandez V., Pita G., Peterlongo P., Dominguez O., de la Hoya M., et al. Whole exome sequencing suggests much of non-BRCA1/BRCA2 familial breast cancer is due to moderate and low penetrance susceptibility alleles. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055681. PubMed DOI PMC
Peterlongo P., Catucci I., Colombo M., Caleca L., Mucaki E., Bogliolo M., et al. FANCM c.5791C>T nonsense mutation (rs144567652) induces exon skipping, affects DNA repair activity and is a familial breast cancer risk factor. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:5345–5355. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv251. PubMed DOI PMC
Neidhardt G., Hauke J., Ramser J., Groß E., Gehrig A., Müller C.R., et al. Association between loss-of-function mutations within the FANCM gene and early-onset familial breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1245–1248. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5592. PubMed DOI PMC
Peterlongo P., Figlioli G., Deans A.J., Couch F.J. Protein truncating variants in FANCM and risk for ER-negative/triple negative breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7:130. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00338-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Figlioli G., Bogliolo M., Catucci I., Caleca L., Lasheras S.V., Pujol R., et al. The FANCM:p.Arg658∗ truncating variant is associated with risk of triple-negative breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019;5:38. doi: 10.1038/s41523-019-0127-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Amos C.I., Dennis J., Wang Z., Byun J., Schumacher F.R., Gayther S.A., et al. The oncoarray consortium: a network for understanding the genetic architecture of common cancers. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2017;26:126–135. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0106. PubMed DOI PMC
Catucci I., Osorio A., Arver B., Neidhardt G., Bogliolo M., Zanardi F., et al. Individuals with FANCM biallelic mutations do not develop Fanconi anemia, but show risk for breast cancer, chemotherapy toxicity and May display chromosome fragility. Genet Med. 2018;20:452–457. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.123. PubMed DOI
Bogliolo M., Bluteau D., Lespinasse J., Pujol R., Vasquez N., D'Enghien C.D., et al. Biallelic truncating FANCM mutations cause early-onset cancer but not Fanconi anemia. Genet Med. 2018;20:458–463. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.124. PubMed DOI
Girard E., Eon-Marchais S., Olaso R., Renault A.-L., Damiola F., Dondon M.-G., et al. Familial breast cancer and DNA repair genes: insights into known and novel susceptibility genes from the GENESIS study, and implications for multigene panel testing. Int J Cancer. 2019;144:1962–1974. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31921. PubMed DOI PMC
Li N., Lim B.W.X., Thompson E.R., McInerny S., Zethoven M., Cheasley D., et al. Investigation of monogenic causes of familial breast cancer: data from the BEACCON case-control study. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7:76. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00279-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Southey M.C., Dowty J.G., Riaz M., Steen J.A., Renault A.-L., Tucker K., et al. Population-based estimates of breast cancer risk for carriers of pathogenic variants identified by gene-panel testing. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7:153. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00360-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Soukupova J., Zemankova P., Lhotova K., Janatova M., Borecka M., Stolarova L., et al. Validation of CZECANCA (CZEch CAncer paNel for clinical application) for targeted NGS-based analysis of hereditary cancer syndromes. PLoS One. 2018;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195761. PubMed DOI PMC
Niu Y., Ferreira Azevedo C.A., Li X., Kamali E., Haagen Nielsen O., Storgaard Sørensen C., et al. Multiparametric and accurate functional analysis of genetic sequence variants using CRISPR-select. Nat Genet. 2022;54:1983–1993. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01224-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Billaud A., Chevalier L.-M., Augereau P., Frenel J.-S., Passot C., Campone M., et al. Functional pre-therapeutic evaluation by genome editing of variants of uncertain significance of essential tumor suppressor genes. Genome Med. 2021;13:174. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00976-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Blomen V.A., Májek P., Jae L.T., Bigenzahn J.W., Nieuwenhuis J., Staring J., et al. Gene essentiality and synthetic lethality in haploid human cells. Science. 2015;350:1092–1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aac7557. PubMed DOI
Brinkman E.K., Kousholt A.N., Harmsen T., Leemans C., Chen T., Jonkers J., et al. Easy quantification of template-directed CRISPR/Cas9 editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:e58. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky164. PubMed DOI PMC
Shen M.W., Arbab M., Hsu J.Y., Worstell D., Culbertson S.J., Krabbe O., et al. Predictable and precise template-free CRISPR editing of pathogenic variants. Nature. 2018;563:646–651. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0686-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Figlioli G., Billaud A., Ahearn T.U., Antonenkova N.N., Becher H., Beckmann M.W., et al. FANCM missense variants and breast cancer risk: a case-control association study of 75,156 European women. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023;31:578–587. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01257-w. PubMed DOI PMC
Allen F., Crepaldi L., Alsinet C., Strong A.J., Kleshchevnikov V., De Angeli P., et al. Predicting the mutations generated by repair of Cas9-induced double-strand breaks. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;37:64–82. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4317. PubMed DOI PMC
Coulthard R., Deans A.J., Swuec P., Bowles M., Costa A., West S.C., et al. Architecture and DNA recognition elements of the Fanconi anemia FANCM-FAAP24 complex. Structure. 2013;21:1648–1658. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.07.006. PubMed DOI PMC
Xue Y., Li Y., Guo R., Ling C., Wang W. FANCM of the Fanconi anemia core complex is required for both monoubiquitination and DNA repair. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:1641–1652. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn054. PubMed DOI PMC
Hodson C., van Twest S., Dylewska M., O'Rourke J.J., Tan W., Murphy V.J., et al. Branchpoint translocation by fork remodelers as a general mechanism of R-loop removal. Cell Rep. 2022;41 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111749. PubMed DOI
Abbouche L., Murphy V.J., Gao J., Twest S Van, Sobinoff A.P., Auweiler K.M., et al. 2024. Mechanism of structure-specific DNA binding by the FANCM branchpoint translocase; pp. 1–15. PubMed DOI PMC
Supek F., Lehner B., Lindeboom R.G.H. To NMD or not to NMD: nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in cancer and other genetic diseases. Trends Genet. 2021;37:657–668. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.11.002. PubMed DOI
Bythell-Douglas R., van Twest S., Abbouche L., Dunn E., Coulthard R.J., Briggs D.C., et al. Structural basis of Fanconi anemia pathway activation by FANCM. EMBO J. 2025 doi: 10.1038/s44318-025-00468-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Panday A., Willis N.A., Elango R., Menghi F., Duffey E.E., Liu E.T., et al. FANCM regulates repair pathway choice at stalled replication forks. Mol Cell. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.03.044. 2020.10.29. PubMed DOI PMC
Stoepker C., Faramarz A., Rooimans M.A., van Mil S.E., Balk J.A., Velleuer E., et al. DNA helicases FANCM and DDX11 are determinants of PARP inhibitor sensitivity. DNA Repair. 2015;26:54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.12.003. PubMed DOI
Liu Z., Jiang H., Lee S.Y., Kong N., Chan Y.W. FANCM promotes PARP inhibitor resistance by minimizing ssDNA gap formation and counteracting resection inhibition. Cell Rep. 2024;43 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114464. PubMed DOI