Selective Dry-Off Therapy in Conventional Dairy Farms: The Influence of Quarter-Level Selection Criteria on Postpartum Mastitis and Somatic Cell Count
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
QK21010123
National Agency for Agricultural Research of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic
SGS grant n. SV24-3-21320
Internal Grant Agency of the Czech University of Life Science Prague
SGS grant n. SV24-16-21310
Internal Grant Agency of the Czech University of Life Science Prague
Project No. LM2023064
METROFOOD-CZ Research Infrastructure (https://metrofood.cz), supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
PubMed
41227497
PubMed Central
PMC12609790
DOI
10.3390/ani15213167
PII: ani15213167
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- antibiotic reduction, mastitis, selective dry cow therapy, somatic cell count, udder health,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The present study assessed the efficacy of selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) on two commercial Holstein-Friesian farms in the Czech Republic, involving 572 quarter milk samples from 74 cows collected over a two-year period. Quarter samples were taken both at dry-off (n = 296) and post-calving (n = 276) to assess somatic cell count (SCC), cultured microbial results (counts), milk composition, and mastitis incidence. The average SCC at dry-off was 264,000 cells/mL (SD = 650,000) in Farm 1 and 224,000 cells/mL in Farm 2. Mastitis incidence averaged 24.42% and 18.75% in Farms 1 and 2, respectively. Correlation analysis revealed significant associations between pre-dry-off milk parameters and post-calving udder health indicators, including negative correlations between SCC prior to drying-off and lactose content after calving (r = -0.161, p < 0.01). Statistical analyses showed a significant farm effect on cultured microbial occurrence and mastitis occurrence after calving (p < 0.05), as well as a significant influence of lactation number on postpartum mastitis and SCC (p < 0.05). Also, mastitis incidence was significantly higher (9.43%, p < 0.05) in treated quarters. The use of selective non-antibiotic dry cow therapy does not impair udder health and milk quality but helps reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance. Further refinement of diagnostic criteria is needed to optimize treatment decisions and improve herd-level outcomes.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Van Boeckel T.P., Brower C., Gilbert M., Grenfell B.T., Levin S.A., Robinson T.P., Teillant A., Laxminarayan R. Global Trends in Antimicrobial Use in Food Animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:5649–5654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503141112. PubMed DOI PMC
Tang K.L., Caffrey N.P., Nóbrega D.B., Cork S.C., Ronksley P.E., Barkema H.W., Polachek A.J., Ganshorn H., Sharma N., Kellner J.D., et al. Restricting the Use of Antibiotics in Food-Producing Animals and Its Associations with Antibiotic Resistance in Food-Producing Animals and Human Beings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lancet Planet. Health. 2017;1:316–327. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30141-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Ferroni L., Albini E., Lovito C., Blasi F., Maresca C., Massacci F.R., Orsini S., Tofani S., Pezzotti G., Diaz Vicuna E., et al. Antibiotic Consumption Is a Major Driver of Antibiotic Resistance in Calves Raised on Italian Cow-Calf Beef Farms. Res. Vet. Sci. 2022;145:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.01.010. PubMed DOI
Gundelach Y., Kalscheuer E., Hamann H., Hoedemaker M. Risk Factors Associated with Bacteriological Cure, New Infection, and Incidence of Clinical Mastitis after Dry Cow Therapy with Three Different Antibiotics. J. Vet. Sci. 2011;12:227–233. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2011.12.3.227. PubMed DOI PMC
Doehring C., Sundrum A. The Informative Value of an Overview on Antibiotic Consumption, Treatment Efficacy and Cost of Clinical Mastitis at Farm Level. Prev. Vet. Med. 2019;165:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.02.004. PubMed DOI
EPC Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on Veterinary Medicinal Products and Repealing Directive 2001/82/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2019;L4:43–167.
Schmerold I., van Geijlswijk I., Gehring R. European Regulations on the Use of Antibiotics in Veterinary Medicine. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023;189:106473. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2023.106473. PubMed DOI
Contiero B., Cozz G., Lora I., Gottardo F. Transition to selective dry cow therapy for responsible antimicrobial use in dairy cattle: A case study. Animal. 2025;19:101567. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2025.101567. PubMed DOI
Lipkens Z., Pierers S., De Vliegher S. Impact of selective dry cow therapy on antimicrobial consumption, udder health, milk yield, and culling hazard in commercial dairy herds. Antibiotics. 2023;12:901. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050901. PubMed DOI PMC
McCubbin K.D., de Jong E., Lam T.J.G.M., Kelton D.F., Middleton J.R., McDougall S., De Vliegher S., Godden S., Rajala-Schultz O.J., Rowe S., et al. Invited review: Selective use of antimicrobials in dairy cattle at drying-off. J. Dairy Sci. 2022;105:7161–7189. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21455. PubMed DOI
Rowe S.M., Godden S.M., Nydam D.V., Gorden P.J., Lago A., Vasquez A.K., Royster E., Timmerman J., Marthaler D. Randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of quarter-level selective dry cow therapy on udder health and antibiotic use in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2021;104:9062–9080. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17961. DOI
Kabera F., Roy J.P., Afifi M., Godden S., Stryhn H., Sanchez J., Dufour S. Comparing Blanket vs. Selective Dry Cow Treatment Approaches for Elimination and Prevention of Intramammary Infections During the Dry Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;8:688450. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.688450. PubMed DOI PMC
Rowe S.M., Godden S.M., Nydam D.V., Gorden P.J., Lago A., Vasquez A.K., Royster E., Timmerman J., Thomas M.J. Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial Investigating the Effect of 2 Selective Dry-Cow Therapy Protocols on Antibiotic Use at Dry-off and Dry Period Intramammary Infection Dynamics. J. Dairy Sci. 2020;103:6473–6492. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17728. PubMed DOI
Winder C.B., Sargeant J.M., Kelton D.F., Leblanc S.J., Duffield T.F., Glanville J., Wood H., Churchill K.J., Dunn J., Bergevin M.D., et al. Comparative Efficacy of Blanket versus Selective Dry-Cow Therapy: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2019;20:217–228. doi: 10.1017/S1466252319000306. PubMed DOI
Weber J., Borchardt S., Seidel J., Schreiter R., Wehrle F., Donat K., Freick M. Effects of Selective Dry Cow Treatment on Intramammary Infection Risk after Calving, Cure Risk during the Dry Period, and Antibiotic Use at Drying-off: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Literature (2000–2021) Animals. 2021;11:3403. doi: 10.3390/ani11123403. PubMed DOI PMC
Rowe S., Kabera F., Dufour S., Godden S., Roy J.P., Nydam D. Selective Dry-Cow Therapy Can Be Implemented Successfully in Cows of All Milk Production Levels. J. Dairy Sci. 2023;106:1953–1967. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22547. PubMed DOI
Cameron M., McKenna S.L., MacDonald K.A., Dohoo I.R., Roy J.P., Keefe G.P. Evaluation of Selective Dry Cow Treatment Following On-Farm Culture: Risk of Postcalving Intramammary Infection and Clinical Mastitis in the Subsequent Lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 2014;97:270–284. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7060. PubMed DOI
Cameron M., Keefe G.P., Roy J.P., Stryhn H., Dohoo I.R., McKenna S.L. Evaluation of Selective Dry Cow Treatment Following On-Farm Culture: Milk Yield and Somatic Cell Count in the Subsequent Lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 2015;98:2427–2436. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8876. PubMed DOI
European Commission Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of 29 April 2004 Laying down Specific Hygiene Rules for Food of Animal Origin. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2004;L269:55–205.
Hommels N.M.C., Ferreira F.C., van den Borne B.H.P., Hogeveen H. Antibiotic Use and Potential Economic Impact of Implementing Selective Dry Cow Therapy in Large US Dairies. J. Dairy Sci. 2021;104:8931–8946. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-20016. PubMed DOI
Bezman D., Lemberskiy-Kuzin L., Katz G., Merin U., Leitner G. Influence of intramammary infection of a single gland in dairy cows on the cow’s milk quality. J. Dairy Res. 2015;82:304–311. doi: 10.1017/S002202991500031X. PubMed DOI
Juozaitienė V., Anskienė L., Čereýkienė E., Juozaitis A., Žymantienė J., Žilaitis V., Bobinienė R. Electrical conductivity of milk in different milking phases and relationship with subclinical mastitis and mastitis pathogens of cows. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2017;27:1829–1835.
Pohl A., Heuwieser W., Burfeind O. Technical note: Assessment of milk temperature measured by automatic milking systems as an indicator of body temperature and fever in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2014;97:4333–4339. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-7997. PubMed DOI
Česká Národní Rada . Zákon č. 246/1992 Sb. na Ochranu Zvířat Proti Týrání. Česká Národní Rada; Prague, Czechia: 1992. [(accessed on 6 November 2024)]. Available online: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/1992-246.
European Parliament Council of the European Union Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes Text with EEA Relevance. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2010;53:33–79.
Knoblochová E., Zink V., Znamínková M., Znamínko P., Haman J., Zdrůbek M. Vliv Kondice Pokožky Struků na Mléčnou Užitkovost a Zdraví Mléčné Žlázy. Agropress.cz. 2017. [(accessed on 8 August 2025)]. Available online: https://www.agropress.cz/vliv-kondice-pokozky-struku-na-mlecnou-uzitkovost-a-zdravi-mlecne-zlazy/
Ohnstad I. NADIS Animal Health Skills Teat Condition Scoring. 2012. [(accessed on 15 August 2025)]. Available online: https://www.nadis.org.uk/disease-a-z/cattle/teat-condition-scoring/
Franquesa O., Herrera D. Environmental Control & Mastitis in Dairy Cows: The Importance of Keeping Your Cows Clean, Dry and Comfortable. 2018. [(accessed on 8 August 2025)]. Available online: https://mastitisvaccination.com/environmental-control-to-avoid-mastitis-in-dairy-cows/
Seeth M.T., Wente N., Paduch J.H., Klocke D., Mansion-De Vries E., Hoedemaker M., Krömker V. Different Selective Dry Cow Therapy Concepts Compared to Blanket Antibiotic Dry Cow Treatment. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausg. G Grosstiere-Nutztiere. 2017;45:343–349. doi: 10.15653/TPG-170208. DOI
Müller S., Nitz J., Tellen A., Klocke D., Krömker V. Effect of Antibiotic Compared to Non-Antibiotic Dry Cow Treatment on the Bacteriological Cure of Intramammary Infections during the Dry Period—A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Antibiotics. 2023;12:429. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030429. PubMed DOI PMC
Green M.J., Green L.E., Medley G.F., Schukken Y.H., Bradley A.J. Influence of Dry Period Bacterial Intramammary Infection on Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2002;85:2589–2599. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74343-9. PubMed DOI
Kabera F., Dufour S., Keefe G., Cameron M., Roy J.P. Evaluation of Quarter-Based Selective Dry Cow Therapy Using Petrifilm on-Farm Milk Culture: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Dairy Sci. 2020;103:7276–7287. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17438. PubMed DOI
Kejdova Rysova L., Duchacek J., Legarova V., Gasparik M., Sebova A., Hermanova S., Codl R., Pytlik J., Stadnik L., Nejeschlebova H. Dynamics of Milk Parameters of Quarter Samples before and after the Dry Period on Czech Farms. Animals. 2023;13:712. doi: 10.3390/ani13040712. PubMed DOI PMC