BACKGROUND: Increasing recreational screen time among adolescents is linked to adverse health outcomes like obesity and poor mental health. This highlights the need for reliable tools to monitor screen-based behaviours. The present study examined the test-retest reliability of recreational screen-time items from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) questionnaire across culturally diverse adolescent populations. METHODS: Using a test-retest design with a 2-3 week interval, we collected data from 750 adolescents (48.8% boys, mean age 15.29 years, SD 2.37) in Mexico (n = 233, aged 10-15y) and Czechia (n = 517, aged 10-18y) in 2022-2024. Self-reported time spent on gaming, social networking, video watching, and internet browsing were evaluated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) for continuous measures and Cohen's kappa for dichotomized outcomes (< 2 vs. ≥ 2 h/day), with analyses stratified by age, gender, and country. RESULTS: Gaming and social networking demonstrated moderate-to-good reliability (ICC = 0.70-0.74, κ = 0.64-0.65, 82-83% unchanged responses). Video watching and browsing were less stable (ICC = 0.52-0.63, κ = 0.41-0.47). Czech primary school students exhibited the highest consistency (ICC = 0.76-0.81), while Mexican students completed the items with lower reliability (ICC = 0.43-0.54). Older adolescents (16-18 years) and girls reported greater stability for gaming and social networking, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The screen-time items tested in this study showed acceptable test-retest reliability across countries, age groups, and sexes, particularly for gaming and social networking. These findings support their use in global adolescent health surveillance, while highlighting the need for refinement of less stable domains such as video watching and internet browsing. Given that samples were not nationally representative, findings should be interpreted within these specific contexts. Future research should enhance measurement precision and inform public health efforts to monitor and address screen-time related health risks.

Centre of Sports Activities Brno University of Technology Brno Czech Republic

Department of Prevention and Health Promotion Faculty of Natural and Social Sciences Heidelberg University of Education Heidelberg Germany

Faculty of Education University of Turku Turku Finland

Faculty of Physical Culture Palacky University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Institute of Sports Science and Innovation Lithuanian Sports University Kaunas Lithuania

National Institute of Public Health Cuernavaca Morelos Mexico

Physical Activity for Health Research Centre Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences Health Research Institute University of Limerick Limerick Ireland

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Bucksch J, Sigmundová D, Hamrik Z, Troped PJ, Melkevik O, Ahluwalia N, et al. International trends in adolescent screen-time behaviors from 2002 to 2010. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58(4):417–25. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.11.014. PubMed DOI

Materová E, Pelclová J, Gába A, Frömel K. Surveillance of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in Czech children and adolescents: a scoping review of the literature from the past two decades. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1–30. 10.1186/s12889-022-12766-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al. Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN) – terminology consensus project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):75. 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Kardefelt-Winther D. How does the time children spend using digital technology impact their mental well‑being, social relationships and physical activity? Innocenti Discussion Paper 2017‑02. UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti. 2017. https://www.eukidsonline.de/wp-content/uploads/Children-digital-technology-wellbeing.pdf.

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Children and watching TV (Facts for Families No. 54). n.d. Retrieved July 2025, from https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Families_and_Youth/Facts_for_Families/FFF-Guide/Children-And-Watching-TV-054.aspx.

Medina C, Jáuregui A, Blas N, Campos I, Macías N, López-Ridaura R, et al. Promoción de actividad física en escolares y adolescentes. Salud Pública de México. 2024;66(4):437–47. 10.21149/15787. PubMed DOI

Janssen I, Medina C, Pedroza A, Barquera S. Screen time in Mexican children: findings from the 2012 national health and nutrition survey (ENSANUT 2012). Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55(5):484–91. PubMed DOI

Carter B, Rees P, Hale L, Bhattacharjee D, Paradkar MS. Association between portable screen-based media device access or use and sleep outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(12):1202–8. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2341. PubMed DOI PMC

Mougharbel F, Chaput JP, Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Colman I, Leatherdale ST, Patte KA, et al. Longitudinal associations between different types of screen use and depression and anxiety symptoms in adolescents. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1101594. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1101594. PubMed DOI PMC

Orben A, Przybylski AK. The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nat Hum Behav. 2019;3(2):173–82. 10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1. PubMed DOI

Fang K, Mu M, Liu K, He Y. Screen time and childhood overweight/obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45(5):744–53. 10.1111/cch.12701. PubMed DOI

Sina E, Buck C, Veidebaum T, Siani A, Reisch L, Pohlabeln H, ... IDEFICS/I. Family consortia. Media use trajectories and risk of metabolic syndrome in European children and adolescents: The IDEFICS/I. Family cohort. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2021;18:1–14. 10.1186/s12966-021-01186-9. PubMed PMC

Skrede T, Steene-Johannessen J, Anderssen SA, Resaland GK, Ekelund U. The prospective association between objectively measured sedentary time, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and cardiometabolic risk factors in youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20(1):55–74. 10.1111/obr.12758. PubMed DOI

Tandon PS, Zhou C, Sallis JF, Cain KL, Frank LD, Saelens BE. Home environment relationships with children’s physical activity, sedentary time, and screen time by socioeconomic status. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:88. 10.1186/1479-5868-9-88. PubMed DOI PMC

Zink J, Belcher BR, Kechter A, Stone MD, Leventhal AM. Reciprocal associations between screen time and emotional disorder symptoms during adolescence. Prev Med Rep. 2019;13:281–8. 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.01.014. PubMed DOI PMC

Alshoaibi A, Alghadir A, Al-Mudahka N. The effect of screen use on sleep quality among adolescents: a systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2023;63:101627. 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_159_23. DOI

Tambalis KD, Panagiotakos DB, Psarra G, Sidossis LS. Screen time and its effect on dietary habits and lifestyle among schoolchildren. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2020;28(4):260–6. 10.21101/cejph.a6097. PubMed DOI

Stiglic N, Viner RM. Effects of screen time on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e023191. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023191. PubMed DOI PMC

Twenge JM, Joiner TE, Rogers ML, Martin GN. Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among U.S. adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clin Psychol Sci. 2018;6(1):3–17. 10.1177/2167702617723376. DOI

Devi KA, Singh SK. The hazards of excessive screen time: impacts on physical health, mental health, and overall well-being. J Educ Health Promot. 2023;12:413. 10.4103/jehp.jehp_447_23. PubMed DOI PMC

Brindova D, Dankulincova Veselska Z, Klein D, Hamrik Z, Sigmundova D, van Dijk JP, Reijneveld SA, Madarasova Geckova A. Is the association between screen-based behaviour and health complaints among adolescents moderated by physical activity? Int J Public Health. 2015;60(2):139–45. 10.1007/s00038-014-0627-x. PubMed

Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME, Saunders TJ, Larouche R, Colley RC, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:98. 10.1186/1479-5868-8-98. PubMed DOI PMC

Hardy LL, Booth ML, Okely AD. The reliability of the adolescent sedentary activity questionnaire. Prev Med. 2007;45(1):71–4. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.03.014. PubMed DOI

Knebel MTG, Costa BGGD, dos Santos PCD, de Sousa ACFC, Silva KS. The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST). J Pediatr. 2022;98(2):175–82. 10.1016/j.jped.2021.05.004. PubMed DOI PMC

Mellecker RR, McManus AM, Matsuzaka A. Validity and reliability of the Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep Scale (SBSS) in young Hong Kong Chinese children. Asian J Exerc Sports Sci. 2012;9(1):1–12.

Rey-López JP, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Verloigne M, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Gracia-Marco L, ... Gómez Lorente JJ. Reliability and validity of a screen time–based sedentary behaviour questionnaire for adolescents: the HELENA study. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22(3):373–377. 10.1093/eurpub/ckr040. PubMed

Rosenberg DE, Norman GJ, Wagner N, Patrick K, Calfas KJ, Sallis JF. Reliability and validity of the sedentary behavior questionnaire (SBQ) for adults. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(6):697–705. 10.1123/jpah.7.6.697. PubMed DOI

Vizcaino M, Buman M, DesRoches CT, Wharton C. Reliability of a new measure to assessmodern screen time in adults. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1386. 10.1186/s12889-019-7745-6. PubMed PMC

Hidding LM, Altenburg TM, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Chinapaw MJ. Systematic review of childhood sedentary behavior questionnaires: what do we know and what is next? Sports Med. 2017;47:677–99. 10.1007/s40279-016-0610-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Phillips SM, Summerbell CD, Hobbs M, Hesketh KR, Saxena S, Muir C, et al. A systematic review of the validity, reliability, and feasibility of measurement tools used to assess the physical activity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school aged children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18:29. 10.1186/s12966-021-01132-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Byrne R, Terranova CO, Trost SG. Measurement of screen time among young children aged 0–6 years: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2021;22(8):e13260. 10.1111/obr.13260. PubMed DOI PMC

Perez O, Garza T, Hindera O, et al. Validated assessment tools for screen media use: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2023;18(4):e0283714. 10.1371/journal.pone.0283714. PubMed DOI PMC

Inchley J, Currie D, Samdal O, Jåstad A, Cosma A, Nic Gabhainn S, editors. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Study Protocol: background, methodology and mandatory items for the 2021/22 survey. Glasgow: MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow; 2023.

World Health Organization. Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS). Geneva: WHO; 2013. https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/surveillance/systems-tools/global-school-based-student-health-survey.

Bobáková D, Hamrik Z, Badura P, Sigmundová D, Nalecz H, Kalman M. Test–retest reliability of selected physical activity and sedentary behaviour HBSC items in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland. Int J Public Health. 2015;60:59–67. 10.1007/s00038-014-0628-9. PubMed DOI

Inchley J, Currie D, Samdal O, Jåstad A, Cosma A, Nic Gabhainn S. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study protocol: Background, methodology and mandatory items for the 2021/22 survey. MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow. 2023.

Kohoutek J, Maráček M, Ng K, Hamrik Z. Test–retest reliability of selected HBSC items in Vietnam: well-being, physical and sedentary activities, and eating behaviours. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022;22(1):135. 10.1186/s12874-022-01624-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Liu Y, Wang M, Tynjälä J, Lv Y, Villberg J, Zhang Z, et al. Test-retest reliability of selected items of Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey questionnaire in Beijing, China. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:73. 10.1186/1471-2288-10-73. PubMed DOI PMC

Hernández B, Gortmaker SL, Laird NM, Colditz GA, Parra-Cabrera S, Peterson KE. Validity and reproducibility of a questionnaire on physical activity and non-activity for school children in Mexico City. Salud Publica Mex. 2000;42(4):315–23. PubMed DOI

Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63. 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. PubMed DOI PMC

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum. 1988.

Parry DA, Davidson BI, Sewall CJR, Fisher JT, Mieczkowski H, Quintana DS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(11):1535–45. 10.1038/s41562-021-01117-5. PubMed DOI

Wade NE, Ortigara JM, Sullivan RM, Tomko RL, Breslin FJ, Baker FC, et al. Passive sensing of preteens’ smartphone use: an Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) cohort substudy. JMIR Ment Health. 2021;8(10):e29426. 10.2196/29426. PubMed DOI PMC

Bjelland M, Soenens B, Bere E, et al. Associations between parental rules, style of communication and children’s screen time. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1002. 10.1186/s12889-015-2337-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Leonhardt M, Overå S. Are there differences in video gaming and use of social media among boys and girls?—A mixed methods approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):6085. 10.3390/ijerph18116085. PubMed DOI PMC

Nagata JM, Singh G, Sajjad OM, Ganson KT, Testa A, Jackson DB, et al. Social epidemiology of early adolescent problematic screen use in the United States. Pediatr Res. 2022;92(5):1443–9. 10.1038/s41390-022-02176-8. PubMed DOI PMC