Domestic dogs can sense the geomagnetic field (GMF), spontaneously aligning their bodies along its axis, altering the alignment's pattern during geomagnetic disturbances. Whether anthropogenic magnetic fields (MF) from high-voltage power lines (PL) influence this behavior remains unclear. We investigated the effects of alternating MF generated by PL on spontaneous magnetic alignment in 36 dogs. Behavior was recorded under north-south (NS) and east-west (EW) oriented PL and compared with control conditions lacking anthropogenic MF. Each dog's mean alignment angle relative to magnetic north was calculated from >50 measurements per condition, and Grand Means (GMs) were derived. Under control geomagnetically calm conditions, alignment was bimodal (GM = 23°/203°), while geomagnetic storms caused significant shifts and increased angular dispersion. Under NS-oriented PL, alignment remained bimodal (GM = 5°/185°), but under EW-oriented PL it became trimodal (Likelihood ratio test for multimodality: nodes = 3, p = 0.042; GM = 103°/283°). These differences were statistically significant (LME for linearized angles: p < 0.001 for control vs. NS PL and control vs. EW PL). Our results demonstrate that dogs maintain directional alignment under PL exposure, with orientation patterns corresponding to the direction of both MF and PL, which suggests a potentially complex impact involving non-magnetic cues.

Department of Biology and Ecology University of Ostrava Chittusiho 10 701 03 Ostrava Czech Republic

Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 165 21 Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ahlbom A., Day N., Feychting M., Roman E., Skinner J., Dockerty J., Linet M., McBride M., Michaelis J., Olsen J.H., et al. A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br. J. Cancer. 2000;83:692–698. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1376. PubMed DOI PMC

Greenland S., Sheppard A.R., Kaune W.T., Poole C., Kelsh M.A. A pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukemia. Childhood Leukemia-EMF Study Group. Epidemiology. 2000;11:624–634. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200011000-00003. PubMed DOI

Zhao L., Liu X., Wang C., Yan K., Lin X., Li S., Bao H., Liu X. Magnetic fields exposure and childhood leukemia risk: A meta-analysis based on 11,699 cases and 13,194 controls. Leuk. Res. 2014;38:269–274. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.12.008. PubMed DOI

Seomun G., Lee J., Park J. Exposure to extremely low- frequency magnetic fields and childhood cancer: A systematic review and meta- analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0251628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251628. PubMed DOI PMC

Feigin V.L., Parmar P.G., Barker-Collo S., Bennett D.A., Anderson C.S., Thrift A.G., Stegmayr B., Rothwell P.M., Giroud M., Bejot Y., et al. Geomagnetic storms can trigger stroke: Evidence from 6 large population-based studies in Europe and Australasia. Stroke. 2014;45:1639–1645. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004577. PubMed DOI

Li D., Odouli R., Wi S., Janevic T., Golditch I., Bracken T.D., Senior R., Rankin R., Iriye R. A population-based prospective cohort study of personal exposure to magnetic fields during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage. Epidemiology. 2002;13:9–20. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200201000-00004. PubMed DOI

Lee G.M., Neutra R.R., Hristova L., Yost M., Hiatt R.A. A nested case-control study of residential and personal magnetic field measures and miscarriages. Epidemiology. 2002;13:21–31. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200201000-00005. PubMed DOI

Li D., Chen H., Ferber J.R., Odouli R., Quesenberry C. Exposure to magnetic field non-ionizing radiation and the risk of miscarriage: A prospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:17541. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16623-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Malagoli C., Crespi C.M., Rodolfi R., Signorelli C., Poli M., Zanichelli P., Fabbi S., Teggi S., Garavelli L., Astolfi G., et al. Maternal exposure to magnetic fields from high-voltage power lines and the risk of birth defects. Bioelectromagnetics. 2012;33:405–409. doi: 10.1002/bem.21700. PubMed DOI

Sarimov R.M., Serov D.A., Gudkov S.V. Biological effects of magnetic storms and ELF magnetic fields. Biology. 2023;12:1506. doi: 10.3390/biology12121506. PubMed DOI PMC

Sarimov R.M., Serov D.A., Gudkov S.V. Hypomagnetic conditions and their biological action (review) Biology. 2023;12:1513. doi: 10.3390/biology12121513. PubMed DOI PMC

Kirschvink J.L., Padmanabha S., Boyce C.K., Oglesby J. Measurement of the threshold sensitivity of honeybees to weak, extremely low-frequency magnetic fields. J. Exp. Biol. 1997;200:1363–1368. doi: 10.1242/jeb.200.9.1363. PubMed DOI

Prato F.S., Desjardins-Holmes D., Keenliside L.D., DeMoor J.M., Robertson J.A., Thomas A.W. Magnetoreception in laboratory mice: Sensitivity to extremely low-frequency fields exceeds 33 nT at 30 Hz. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2013;10:20121046. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.1046. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhadin M.N., Deryugina O.N., Pisachenko T.M. Influence of combined DC and AC magnetic fields on rat behavior. Bioelectromagnetics. 1999;20:378–386. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(199909)20:6<378::AID-BEM7>3.0.CO;2-0. PubMed DOI

Nishimura T., Okano H., Tada H., Nishimura E., Sugimoto K., Mohri K., Fukushima M. Lizards respond to an extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field. J. Exp. Biol. 2010;213:1985–1990. doi: 10.1242/jeb.031609. PubMed DOI

Vanderstraeten J., Gillis P. Theoretical evaluation of magnetoreception of power-frequency fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 2010;31:371–379. doi: 10.1002/bem.20568. PubMed DOI

Kolbabová T., Pascal Malkemper E., Bartoš L., Vanderstraeten J., Turčáni M., Burda H. Effect of exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields on melatonin levels in calves is seasonally dependent. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:14206. doi: 10.1038/srep14206. PubMed DOI PMC

Vanderstraeten J. Magnetic Fields and Health: From Epidemiology to Cryptochrome Chemistry. Rev. Med. Brux. 2017;38:79–89. PubMed

Xie C. Searching for unity in diversity of animal magnetoreception: From biology to quantum mechanics and back. Innov. 2022;3:100229. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100229. PubMed DOI PMC

Wiltschko R., Wiltschko W. In: Magnetic Orientation in Animals. Bradshaw S.D., Burggren W., Heller H.C., Ishii S., Langer H., Neuweiler G., Randall D.J., editors. Volume 33. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 1995. (Zoophysiology). DOI

Kirschvink J. Homing in on vertebrates. Nature. 1997;390:339–340. doi: 10.1038/36986. DOI

Diego-Rasilla F.J. Homing ability and sensitivity to the geomagnetic field in the alpine newt, Triturus alpestris. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2003;15:251–259. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2003.9522670. DOI

Mouritsen H. Long-distance navigation and magnetoreception in migratory animals. Nature. 2018;558:50–59. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0176-1. PubMed DOI

Lohmann K.J., Goforth K.M., Mackiewicz A.G., Lim D.S., Lohmann C.M.F. Magnetic maps in animal navigation. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 2022;208:41–67. doi: 10.1007/s00359-021-01529-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Burda H., Begall S., Hart V., Malkemper E.P., Painter M.S., Phillips J.B. The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2020. Magnetoreception in mammals; pp. 421–444. DOI

Phillips J.B., Youmans P.W., Muheim R., Sloan K.A., Landler L., Painter M.S., Anderson C.R. Rapid learning of magnetic compass direction by C57BL/6 mice in a 4-armed ‘plus’ water maze. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073112. PubMed DOI PMC

Phillips J.B., Muheim R., Painter M.S., Raines J., Anderson C., Landler L., Dommer D., Raines A., Deutschlander M., Whitehead J., et al. Why is it so difficult to study magnetic compass orientation in murine rodents? J. Comp. Physiol. A. 2022;208:197–212. doi: 10.1007/s00359-021-01532-z. PubMed DOI

Schneider W.T., Holland R.A., Keišs O., Lindecke O. Migratory bats are sensitive to magnetic inclination changes during the compass calibration period. Biol. Lett. 2023;19:20230181. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0181. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang L., Malkemper E.P. Cryptochromes in mammals: A magnetoreception misconception? Front. Physiol. 2023;14:1250798. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1250798. PubMed DOI PMC

Hart V., Nováková P., Malkemper E., Begall S., Hanzal V., Ježek M., Kušta T., Němcová V., Adámková J., Benediktová K., et al. Dogs are sensitive to small variations of the Earth’s magnetic field. Front. Zool. 2013;10:80. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-10-80. PubMed DOI PMC

Martini S., Begall S., Findeklee T., Schmitt M., Malkemper E.P., Burda H. Dogs can be trained to find a bar magnet. Peer J. 2018;6:e6117. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6117. PubMed DOI PMC

Benediktová K., Adámková J., Svoboda J., Painter M.S., Bartoš L., Nováková P., Vynikalová L., Hart V., Phillips J., Burda H. Magnetic alignment enhances homing efficiency of hunting dogs. eLife. 2020;9:e55080. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55080. PubMed DOI PMC

Yosef R., Raz M., Ben-Baruch N., Shmueli L., Kosicki J.Z., Fratczak M., Tryjanowski P. Directional preferences of dogs’ changes in the presence of a bar magnet: Educational experiments in Israel. J. Vet. Behav. 2020;35:34–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2019.10.003. DOI

Nießner C., Denzau S., Malkemper E.P., Gross J.C., Burda H., Winklhofer M., Peichl L. Cryptochrome 1 in retinal cone photoreceptors suggests a novel functional role in mammals. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:21848. doi: 10.1038/srep21848. PubMed DOI PMC

Vacha M. The Oxford Handbook of Invertebrate Neurobiology, Chapter 14. Oxford Academic; Oxford, UK: 2019. Magnetoreception of invertebrates; pp. 367–388. Oxford Handbooks. DOI

Xu J., Jarocha L.E., Zollitsch T., Konowalczyk M., Henbest K.B., Richert S., Golesworthy M.J., Schmidt J., Déjean V., Sowood D.J.C., et al. Magnetic sensitivity of cryptochrome 4 from a migratory songbird. Nature. 2021;594:535–540. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03618-9. PubMed DOI

Caspar K.R., Moldenhauer K., Moritz R.E., Němec P., Malkemper E.P., Begall S. Eyes are essential for magnetoreception in a mammal. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2020;17:20200513. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0513. PubMed DOI PMC

Muheim R., Boström J., Akesson S., Liedvogel M. Animal Movement Across Scales, Chapter 10. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2014. Sensory mechanisms of animal orientation and navigation; pp. 179–194.

Naisbett-Jones L.C., Lohmann K.J. Magnetoreception and magnetic navigation in fishes: A half century of discovery. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 2022;208:19–40. doi: 10.1007/s00359-021-01527-w. PubMed DOI

Begall S., Malkemper E.P., Červený J., Němec P., Burda H. Magnetic alignment in mammals and other animals. Mamm. Biol. 2013;78:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2012.05.005. DOI

Bianco G., Köhler R.C., Ilieva M., Åkesson S. The importance of time of day for magnetic body alignment in songbirds. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 2022;208:135–144. doi: 10.1007/s00359-021-01536-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Diego-Rasilla F.J., Pérez-Mellado V., Pérez-Cembranos A. Spontaneous magnetic alignment behaviour in free-living lizards. Sci. Nat. 2017;104:13. doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1439-7. PubMed DOI

Obleser P., Hart V., Malkemper E.P., Begall S., Holá M., Painter M.S., Červený J., Burda H. Compass-controlled escape behavior in roe deer. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2016;70:1345–1355. doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2142-y. DOI

Schlegel P.A., Renner H. Innate preference for magnetic compass direction in the Alpine newt, Triturus alpestris (Salamandridae, Urodela)? J. Ethol. 2007;25:185–193. doi: 10.1007/s10164-006-0017-9. DOI

Vácha M., Kvíčalová M., Půžová T. American Cockroaches Prefer Four Cardinal Geomagnetic Positions at Rest. Behaviour. 2010;147:425–440. doi: 10.1163/000579509x12580965484148. DOI

Moritz R.E., Burda H., Begall S., Němec P. Magnetic compass: A useful tool underground. In: Begall S., Burda H., Schleich C.E., editors. Subterranean Rodents. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2007. pp. 161–174. DOI

Phillips J.B., Muheim R., Jorge P.E. A behavioral perspective on the biophysics of the light-dependent magnetic compass: A link between directional and spatial perception? J. Exp. Biol. 2010;213:3247–3255. doi: 10.1242/jeb.020792. PubMed DOI

Cafazzo S., Natoli E., Valsecchi P. Scent-marking behaviour in a pack of free-ranging domestic dogs. Ethology. 2012;118:955–966. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2012.02088.x. DOI

Burda H., Begall S., Cerveny J., Neef J., Nemec P. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields disrupt magnetic alignment of ruminants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:5708–5713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811194106. PubMed DOI PMC

Olsen J.H., Nielsen A., Schulgen G. Residence near high voltage facilities and risk of cancer in children. BMJ. 1993;307:891–895. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6909.891. PubMed DOI PMC

Hamza A.H., Mahmoud S.A., Abdel-Gawad N.M., Ghania S.M. Evaluation of magnetic induction inside humans at high voltage substations. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2005;74:231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2004.10.006. DOI

Pretterer G., Bubna-Littitz H., Windischbauer G., Gabler C., Griebel U. Brightness discrimination in the dog. J. Vis. 2004;4:10. doi: 10.1167/4.3.10. PubMed DOI

Bolón D., Crujeiras R.M., Rodríguez-Casal A. A likelihood ratio test for circular multimodality. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 2025;32:57–87. doi: 10.1007/s10651-024-00639-1. DOI

Pewsey A., Neuhäuser M., Ruxton G.D. Circular Statistics in R. 1st ed. Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA: 2013.

Mardia K.V., Jupp P.E. Directional Statistics. 1st ed. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 1999. (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics). DOI

Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall International; Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: 1999.

Landler L., Ruxton G.D., Malkemper E.P. The multivariate analysis of variance as a powerful approach for circular data. Mov. Ecol. 2022;10:21. doi: 10.1186/s40462-022-00323-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Adámková J., Benediktová K., Svoboda J., Bartoš L., Vynikalová L., Nováková P., Hart V., Painter M.S., Burda H. Turning preference in dogs: North attracts while south repels. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0245940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245940. PubMed DOI PMC

Rouviere A., Ruxton G.D. No evidence for magnetic alignment in domestic dogs in urban parks. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;49:71–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2021.11.005. DOI

Vanselow K.H., Ricklefs K. Are solar activity and sperm whale Physeter macrocephalus strandings around the North Sea related? J. Sea Res. 2005;53:319–327. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2004.07.006. DOI

Krylov V.V., Zotov O.D., Klain B.I., Ushakova N.V., Kantserova N.P., Znobisheva A.V., Izyumov Y.G., Kuz’mina V.V., Morozov A.A., Lysenko L.A., et al. An experimental study of the biological effects of geomagnetic disturbances: The impact of a typical geomagnetic storm and its constituents on plants and animals. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 2014;110–111:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2014.01.020. DOI

Benediktová K., Iakovenko N., Adámková J., Bartoš L., Brinkeová H., Hart V., Bartošová J., Burda H. Solitary working hunting dogs show a higher tendency for magnetic alignment, with decreased alignment in older dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2025;285:106575. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106575. DOI

Johnsen S., Lohmann K.J., Warrant E.J. Animal navigation: A noisy magnetic sense? Pt 18J. Exp. Biol. 2020;223:jeb164921. doi: 10.1242/jeb.164921. PubMed DOI

Dreyer D., Frost B., Mouritsen H., Günther A., Green K., Whitehouse M., Johnsen S., Heinze S., Warrant E. The Earth’s magnetic field and visual landmarks steer migratory flight behavior in the nocturnal Australian Bogong moth. Curr. Biol. 2018;28:2160–2166.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.030. PubMed DOI

Muheim R., Schmaljohann H., Alerstam T. Feasibility of sun and magnetic compass mechanisms in avian long-distance migration. Mov. Ecol. 2018;6:8. doi: 10.1186/s40462-018-0126-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Wiltschko W. Further analysis of the magnetic compass of migratory birds. In: Schmidt-Koenig K., Keeton W.T., editors. Animal Migration, Navigation, and Homing. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 1978. pp. 302–310. (Proceedings in Life Sciences). DOI