PURPOSE: The phase III, open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized Ewing 2008R1 trial (EudraCT2008-003658-13) was conducted in 12 countries to evaluate the effect of zoledronic acid (ZOL) maintenance therapy compared with no add-on regarding event-free survival (EFS, primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS) in standard-risk Ewing sarcoma (EWS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had localized EWS with either good histologic response to induction chemotherapy and/or small tumors (<200 mL). Patients received six cycles of VIDE induction and eight cycles of VAI (male) or eight cycles of VAC (female) consolidation. ZOL treatment started parallel to the sixth consolidation cycle. Randomization was stratified by tumor site (pelvis/other). The two-sided adaptive inverse-normal four-stage design (planned sample size 448 patients, significance level 5%, power 80%) was changed after the first interim analysis using the Müller-Schäfer method. RESULTS: Between April 2010 and November 2018, 284 patients were randomized (142 ZOL/142 no add-on). With a median follow-up of 3.9 years, EFS was not significantly different between ZOL and no add-on group in the adaptive design (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.43-1.28, P = 0.27, intention-to-treat). Three-year EFS rates were 84.0% (95% CI, 77.7%-90.8%) for ZOL vs. 81.7% (95% CI, 75.2%-88.8%) for no add-on. Results were similar in the per-protocol collective. OS was not different between groups. The 3-year OS was 92.8% (95% CI, 88.4%-97.5%) for ZOL and 94.6% (95% CI, 90.9%-98.6%) for no add-on. Noticeable more renal, neurologic, and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed for ZOL (P < 0.05). Severe renal toxicities occurred more often in the ZOL arm (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with standard-risk localized EWS, there is no additional benefit from maintenance treatment with ZOL.

• MeSH
• doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
• Ewingův sarkom * patologie   MeSH
• kyselina zoledronová terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory kostí * patologie   MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

PURPOSE: Most aspects of osteosarcoma have been addressed in detail, but there is no comprehensive analysis of deceased patients and causes of death. METHODS: The database of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group COSS (1980-03/31/2021; 4475 registered high-grade central osteosarcoma patients) was searched deaths from any cause. Affected patients were analyzed for demographic and baseline variables and disease-status at the time of demise. Deaths from causes other than osteosarcoma were analyzed in detail. RESULTS: A total of 1520 deceased patients were identified (median age (range) at osteosarcoma diagnosis 16 (2-78) years; 908 (59.7%) male, 612 (40.3%) female; primary tumor: extremities 1263 (83.1%), trunk 208 (13.7%), craniofacial 47 (3.1%) (site unknown 2); metastases at registration: absent 1.051 (69.1%), present 466 (30.7%) (3 no data). The median time from diagnosis to death was 2.22 (0.08-32.02) years. 1286 (84.6%) patients succumbed to osteosarcoma (370 without achieving complete remission, 488 first, 428 more than one recurrences), 146 (9.6%) to other, 88 (5.8%) to unknown causes. Chemotherapy-related infections (40), secondary malignancies (39), and perioperative complications (19) were among the most frequent potentially treatment-related causes, and high-dose methotrexate (19), doxorubicin (17), and ifosfamide (15) were the drugs most commonly held responsible. Patients with unknown causes of death had an unusually long median follow-up. CONCLUSION: The major cause of death of patients after osteosarcoma is this malignancy, mostly from one of its multiple relapses. However, almost 10% of fatalities are due to other documented causes. Some of these deaths may be preventable with the knowledge gained from comprehensive analyses such as this.

• MeSH
• cisplatina terapeutické užití   MeSH
• doxorubicin terapeutické užití   MeSH
• ifosfamid terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru MeSH
• methotrexát MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• nádory kostí * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• osteosarkom * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• příčina smrti MeSH
• protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH

PURPOSE: Ewing 2008R3 was conducted in 12 countries and evaluated the effect of treosulfan and melphalan high-dose chemotherapy (TreoMel-HDT) followed by reinfusion of autologous hematopoietic stem cells on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival in high-risk Ewing sarcoma (EWS). METHODS: Phase III, open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients had disseminated EWS with metastases to bone and/or other sites, excluding patients with only pulmonary metastases. Patients received six cycles of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide induction and eight cycles of vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide consolidation therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive additional TreoMel-HDT or no further treatment (control). The random assignment was stratified by number of bone metastases (1, 2-5, and > 5). The one-sided adaptive-inverse-normal-4-stage-design was changed after the first interim analysis via Müller-Schäfer method. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2018, 109 patients were randomly assigned, and 55 received TreoMel-HDT. With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, there was no significant difference in EFS between TreoMel-HDT and control in the adaptive design (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.32, intention-to-treat). Three-year EFS was 20.9% (95% CI, 11.5 to 37.9) in TreoMel-HDT and 19.2% (95% CI, 10.8 to 34.4) in control patients. The results were similar in the per-protocol collective. Males treated with TreoMel-HDT had better EFS compared with controls: median 1.0 years (95% CI, 0.8 to 2.2) versus 0.6 years (95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9); P = .035; HR 0.52 (0.28 to 0.97). Patients age < 14 years benefited from TreoMel-HDT with a 3-years EFS of 39.3% (95% CI, 20.4 to 75.8%) versus 9% (95% CI, 2.4 to 34); P = .016; HR 0.40 (0.19 to 0.87). These effects were similar in the per-protocol collective. This observation is supported by comparable results from the nonrandomized trial EE99R3. CONCLUSION: In patients with very high-risk EWS, additional TreoMel-HDT was of no benefit for the entire cohort of patients. TreoMel-HDT may be of benefit for children age < 14 years.

• MeSH
• busulfan analogy a deriváty   MeSH
• chemoterapie konsolidační MeSH
• cyklofosfamid MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• doxorubicin MeSH
• etoposid MeSH
• Ewingův sarkom * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• melfalan MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• přežití po terapii bez příznaků nemoci MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• vinkristin MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH