AIMS: To demonstrate the bioequivalence of macitentan/tadalafil fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets with single-component tablets of macitentan and tadalafil in healthy subjects. METHODS: Studies AC-077-101 and AC-077-103 were single-centre, open-label, single-dose, 2-period, randomized, crossover Phase 1 studies conducted in healthy subjects. Two FDCs were investigated: FDC-1 and FDC-2 in Study AC-077-101 and FDC-2 in Study AC-077-103. Both FDCs contained 10 mg/40 mg of macitentan/tadalafil and differed in excipients and coating materials used. In both studies, pharmacokinetic sampling over 216 hours was conducted, and pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: Bioequivalence of macitentan, its active metabolite ACT-132577, and tadalafil was established for FDC-2 in both studies AC-077-101 and AC-077-103 in which tadalafil as a single component was sourced from the USA and EU, respectively, to fulfil regional regulatory requirements. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration with 90% confidence intervals of all components were entirely within the bioequivalence limits (0.8000-1.2500). No subject died and no serious adverse events were reported in either studies. CONCLUSION: The FDC-2 tablet containing 10 mg/40 mg of macitentan/tadalafil was bioequivalent to the free combination of 10 mg macitentan and 40 mg tadalafil (both US and EU sourced). Macitentan and tadalafil were well tolerated when administered as FDC or as a free combination.

• Klíčová slova
• bioequivalence, fixed-dose combination, macitentan, pulmonary arterial hypertension, tadalafil,
• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• fixní kombinace léků MeSH
• hypoglykemika * farmakologie   MeSH
• klinické křížové studie MeSH
• léky s prodlouženým účinkem MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• metformin * MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• plocha pod křivkou MeSH
• pyrimidiny * farmakologie   MeSH
• sulfonamidy * farmakologie   MeSH
• tablety MeSH
• tadalafil * farmakologie   MeSH
• terapeutická ekvivalence MeSH
• zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• Názvy látek
• fixní kombinace léků MeSH
• hypoglykemika * MeSH
• léky s prodlouženým účinkem MeSH
• macitentan MeSH Prohlížeč
• metformin * MeSH
• pyrimidiny * MeSH
• sulfonamidy * MeSH
• tablety MeSH
• tadalafil * MeSH

BACKGROUND: To study the pharmacokinetic and -dynamic behavior of landiolol in the presence of dobutamine in healthy subjects of European ancestry. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective randomized study in 16 healthy subjects each receiving an infusion of dobutamine sufficient to increase heart rate by 30 bpm followed by a 60 min infusion of 10 μg/kg/min landiolol. RESULTS: Dobutamine-induced increases in heart rate were stable for at least 20 min before a 60 min landiolol- infusion was started. The dobutamine effects were rapidly antagonized by landiolol within 16 min. A further slight decrease in heart rate during 20-60 min of the landiolol infusion occurred as well. Upon termination of landiolol infusion, heart rate and blood pressure recovered rapidly in response to the persisting dobutamine infusion but did not return to the maximum values before landiolol infusion. The pharmacokinetic parameters of landiolol in presence of dobutamine showed a short half-life (3.5 min) and a low distribution volume (0.3 l/kg). No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Landiolol can antagonize the dobutamine-induced increases in heart rate and blood pressure in a fast way. A rapid bradycardic effect until steady-state plasma levels is followed by a slow heart rate reduction. The latter can be attributed to an early desensitization to dobutamine. Consequently, after termination of landiolol, the heart rate did not achieve maximum pre-landiolol values. The pharmacokinetics of landiolol during dobutamine infusion are similar when compared to short- and long-term data in Caucasian subjects. Landiolol in the given dose can thus serve as an antagonist of dobutamine-induced cardiac effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number 2010-023311-34 at the EU Clinical Trials Register, registration date 2010-12-21.

• Klíčová slova
• Cardioselective β-blocker, Dobutamine, Landiolol, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics,
• MeSH
• beta blokátory aplikace a dávkování   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• dobutamin aplikace a dávkování   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• intravenózní infuze MeSH
• kardiotonika aplikace a dávkování   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• klinické křížové studie MeSH
• krevní tlak účinky léků   fyziologie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• močovina aplikace a dávkování   analogy a deriváty   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• morfoliny aplikace a dávkování   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• srdeční frekvence účinky léků   fyziologie   MeSH
• zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• beta blokátory MeSH
• dobutamin MeSH
• kardiotonika MeSH
• landiolol MeSH Prohlížeč
• močovina MeSH
• morfoliny MeSH

PURPOSE: A national primary and secondary healthcare-level study in the Czech Republic has not yet been conducted to evaluate the prevalence of migraine. We analyzed the current treatment patterns (acute and prophylactic) in migraine patients and the number of migraine patients potentially eligible for treatment with recent calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway-targeted therapies. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized the Ministry of the Interior Health Insurance Fund claims database of the Czech Republic wherein every citizen is insured. Migraine patients with or without aura, and potentially on triptan therapy were included in this study (index years 2012-2016). The prevalence approach included all patients (new and old) present in each index year. Prophylactic therapies were followed f0or three and seven years prior to the index year, including the index year, until 2010. The incidence approach included all patients first diagnosed in each index year. Prophylactic therapies were followed for the next three years, including the index year, until 2017 following incidence approach. The primary endpoint of this study was to determine the rate of migraine prevalence and diagnosis for each index year during the period 2012-2016. The study also evaluated prophylactic and acute treatment patterns and comorbidities among patients in 2016. RESULTS: The rate of migraine prevalence was 1% and the rate of diagnosis was 0.2-0.4%. By prevalence approach, approximately 39% of the patients were on prophylactics, and 11.2% and 21.6% of the patient population had two prior treatment failures (three- and seven-year recall period, respectively). Antiepileptics (26%) and beta blockers (15.8%) were the most prescribed prophylactics, and sumatriptan was the predominant triptan used (12%) for acute treatment. CONCLUSION: Taking into account the number of inhabitants in the Czech Republic (10.7 million), there could be up to 23,000 adult patients eligible for novel CGRP therapies.

• Klíčová slova
• CGRP, claims database, prophylactics, triptans,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the pediatric dispersible tablet formulation of macitentan and the adult film-coated tablet formulation of macitentan in healthy subjects. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period, crossover, Phase 1 study was conducted in 12 healthy adults. Subjects were randomized to one of the two possible treatment sequences A/B or B/A on Day 1 under fasted conditions. Treatment A was a single 10 mg dose of macitentan (film-coated adult formulation) and Treatment B was a single 10 mg dose of macitentan, consisting of two 5 mg dispersible tablets (pediatric formulation). PK sampling over 216 hours was conducted, and PK parameters were derived using non-compartmental methods. For macitentan, geometric means ratio of peak plasma concentrations (Cmax ), plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t ), and plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) were 1.140, 0.974, and 0.974, respectively. The corresponding 90% confidence intervals fell entirely within the referenced range of 0.8000 to 1.2500, which is used for evaluation of bioequivalence. These results indicate no significant differences between the pediatric dispersible tablet and the adult film-coated tablet. Both formulations were well tolerated. The pediatric dispersible tablet is biocomparable to the adult film-coated tablet formulation.

• Klíčová slova
• bioavailability, clinical trials, pediatrics, respiratory medicine,
• MeSH
• biologická dostupnost MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• klinické křížové studie MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• omezení příjmu potravy metabolismus   MeSH
• plocha pod křivkou MeSH
• pyrimidiny aplikace a dávkování   krev   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• sulfonamidy aplikace a dávkování   krev   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• tablety MeSH
• zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze I MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• macitentan MeSH Prohlížeč
• pyrimidiny MeSH
• sulfonamidy MeSH
• tablety MeSH

BACKGROUND: Macitentan is a clinically approved endothelin receptor antagonist for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Increasing use of combination drug therapy in PAH means that it is important to recognize potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that could affect the efficacy and safety of macitentan in patients with PAH. OBJECTIVE: Two Phase 1 studies were conducted to investigate the effect of macitentan at steady-state on the pharmacokinetics of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) substrates, rosuvastatin and riociguat in healthy male subjects. Another objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of concomitant administration of rosuvastatin or riociguat with macitentan. METHODS: Healthy male subjects received a single oral dose of rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 20) or riociguat 1 mg (n = 20) on Day 1 (reference treatment). A loading oral dose of macitentan 30 mg was administered on Day 5 followed by macitentan 10 mg once-daily from Day 6 to Day 15 (riociguat study) or Day 6 to Day 16 (rosuvastatin study). A concomitant oral dose of rosuvastatin 10 mg or riociguat 1 mg was administered on Day 10 (test treatment). Pharmacokinetics were evaluated for 96 h after treatment on Day 1 and for 144 h (riociguat study) or 168 h (rosuvastatin study) after treatment on Day 10. To compare the reference and test treatments, the geometric mean ratio was calculated for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from zero (pre-dose) to time of the last measured concentration above the limit of quantification (AUC0-t), the AUC from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) and the terminal elimination half-life (t½) of rosuvastatin, riociguat and riociguat's metabolite, M1. The difference in the time to reach maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was determined by the Wilcoxon test. Trough levels of macitentan and its metabolite, ACT-132577, were measured and safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS: Ninety percent confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios were within the bioequivalence criteria of 0.80-1.25. There was no significant difference between test and reference tmax. Rosuvastatin or riociguat did not affect the steady-state concentrations of macitentan and ACT-132577. The adverse event profile was consistent with the known safety profiles of the drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Macitentan 10 mg did not affect the pharmacokinetics of BCRP substrates, rosuvastatin or riociguat in healthy male subjects. EudraCT numbers: 2017-003095-31 and 2017-003502-41.

• MeSH
• ABC transportér z rodiny G, člen 2 metabolismus   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• lékové interakce MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• nádorové proteiny metabolismus   MeSH
• pyrazoly farmakokinetika   MeSH
• pyrimidiny farmakokinetika   farmakologie   MeSH
• rosuvastatin kalcium farmakokinetika   MeSH
• sulfonamidy farmakologie   MeSH
• zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• ABC transportér z rodiny G, člen 2 MeSH
• ABCG2 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
• macitentan MeSH Prohlížeč
• nádorové proteiny MeSH
• pyrazoly MeSH
• pyrimidiny MeSH
• riociguat MeSH Prohlížeč
• rosuvastatin kalcium MeSH
• sulfonamidy MeSH

BACKGROUND: In patients with septic shock, the presence of an elevated heart rate (HR) after fluid resuscitation marks a subgroup of patients with a particularly poor prognosis. Several studies have shown that HR control in this population is safe and can potentially improve outcomes. However, all were conducted in a single-center setting. The aim of this multicenter study is to demonstrate that administration of the highly beta1-selective and ultrashort-acting beta blocker landiolol in patients with septic shock and persistent tachycardia (HR ≥ 95 beats per minute [bpm]) is effective in reducing and maintaining HR without increasing vasopressor requirements. METHODS: A phase IV, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled study is being conducted. The study will enroll a total of 200 patients with septic shock as defined by The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria and tachycardia (HR ≥ 95 bpm) despite a hemodynamic optimization period of 24-36 h. Patients are randomized (1:1) to receive either standard treatment (according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2016) and continuous landiolol infusion to reach a target HR of 80-94 bpm or standard treatment alone. The primary endpoint is HR response (HR 80-94 bpm), the maintenance thereof, and the absence of increased vasopressor requirements during the first 24 h after initiating treatment. DISCUSSION: Despite recent studies, the role of beta blockers in the treatment of patients with septic shock remains unclear. This study will investigate whether HR control using landiolol is safe, feasible, and effective, and further enhance the understanding of beta blockade in patients with septic shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials Register; EudraCT, 2017-002138-22 . Registered on 8 August 2017.

• Klíčová slova
• Beta-blocker, Landiolol, Randomized controlled trial, Sepsis, Septic shock, Tachycardia,
• MeSH
• antiarytmika škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• beta blokátory škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• časové faktory MeSH
• jednotky intenzivní péče * MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze IV jako téma MeSH
• krevní tlak účinky léků   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• močovina škodlivé účinky   analogy a deriváty   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• morfoliny škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• multicentrické studie jako téma MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
• septický šok diagnóza   farmakoterapie   patofyziologie   MeSH
• srdeční frekvence účinky léků   MeSH
• vazokonstriktory terapeutické užití   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• protokol klinické studie MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Evropa MeSH
• Názvy látek
• antiarytmika MeSH
• beta blokátory MeSH
• landiolol MeSH Prohlížeč
• močovina MeSH
• morfoliny MeSH
• vazokonstriktory MeSH