AIMS: To compare insulin dose adjustments made by physicians to those made by an artificial intelligence-based decision support system, the Advisor Pro, in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using an insulin pump and self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG). METHODS: This was a multinational, non-interventional study surveying 17 physicians from 11 countries. Each physician was asked to provide insulin dose adjustments for the settings of the pump including basal rate, carbohydrate-to-insulin ratios (CRs), and correction factors (CFs) for 15 data sets of pumps and SMBG of people with T1D (mean age 18.4 ± 4.8 years; eight females; mean glycated hemoglobin 8.2% ± 1.4% [66 ± 11mmol/mol]). The recommendations were compared among the physicians and between the physicians and the Advisor Pro. The study endpoint was the percentage of comparison points for which there was an agreement on the direction of insulin dose adjustments. RESULTS: The percentage (mean ± SD) of agreement among the physicians on the direction of insulin pump dose adjustments was 51.8% ± 9.2%, 54.2% ± 6.4%, and 49.8% ± 11.6% for the basal, CR, and CF, respectively. The automated recommendations of the Advisor Pro on the direction of insulin dose adjustments were comparable )49.5% ± 6.4%, 55.3% ± 8.7%, and 47.6% ± 14.4% for the basal rate, CR, and CF, respectively( and noninferior to those provided by physicians. The mean absolute difference in magnitude of change between physicians was 17.1% ± 13.1%, 14.6% ± 8.4%, and 23.9% ± 18.6% for the basal, CR, and CF, respectively, and comparable to the Advisor Pro 11.7% ± 9.7%, 10.1% ± 4.5%, and 25.5% ± 19.5%, respectively, significant for basal and CR. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable differences in the recommendations for changes in insulin dosing were observed among physicians. Since automated recommendations by the Advisor Pro were similar to those given by physicians, it could be considered a useful tool to manage T1D.
- Klíčová slova
- Advisor Pro *, automated decision support *, insulin pump settings adjustments *, self-monitoring of blood glucose *, type 1 diabetes *,
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 1. typu * farmakoterapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- glykovaný hemoglobin analýza MeSH
- hypoglykemika MeSH
- inzulin MeSH
- inzulinové infuzní systémy MeSH
- krevní glukóza MeSH
- lékaři * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- selfmonitoring glykemie MeSH
- umělá inteligence MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- glykovaný hemoglobin MeSH
- hypoglykemika MeSH
- inzulin MeSH
- krevní glukóza MeSH
BACKGROUND: Maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is the most commonly reported form of monogenic diabetes in the pediatric population. Only a few cases of digenic MODY have been reported up to now. CASE REPORT: A female patient was diagnosed with diabetes at the age of 7 years and was treated with insulin. A strong family history of diabetes was present in the maternal side of the family. The patient also presented hypomagnesemia, glomerulocystic kidney disease and a bicornuate uterus. Genetic testing of the patient revealed that she was a double heterozygous carrier of HNF1A gene variant c.685C > T; (p.Arg229Ter) and a whole gene deletion of the HNF1B gene. Her mother was a carrier of the same HNF1A variant. CONCLUSION: Digenic inheritance of MODY pathogenic variants is probably more common than currently reported in literature. The use of Next Generation Sequencing panels in testing strategies for MODY could unmask such cases that would otherwise remain undiagnosed.
- Klíčová slova
- Digenic MODY, HNF1A-MODY, HNF1B-MODY, MODY 3, MODY 5,
- MeSH
- cystická onemocnění ledvin genetika patologie MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 2. typu genetika patologie MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- fenotyp MeSH
- hepatocytární jaderný faktor 1-alfa genetika MeSH
- hepatocytární jaderný faktor 1-beta genetika MeSH
- heterozygot MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mutace MeSH
- nemoci ledvin genetika patologie MeSH
- uterus abnormality MeSH
- vrozené poruchy tubulárního transportu genetika patologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- kazuistiky MeSH
- Názvy látek
- hepatocytární jaderný faktor 1-alfa MeSH
- hepatocytární jaderný faktor 1-beta MeSH
- HNF1A protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- HNF1B protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
BACKGROUND: Frequent use of modern diabetes technologies increases the chance for optimal type 1 diabetes (T1D) control. Limited reimbursement influences the access of patients with T1D to these modalities and could worsen their prognosis. We aimed to describe the situation of reimbursement for insulins, glucometers, insulin pumps (CSII) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for children with T1D in European countries participating in the SWEET Project and to compare data from EU countries with data from our previous study in 2009. METHODS: The study was conducted between March 2017 and August 2017. First, we approached diabetes technology companies with a survey to map the reimbursement of insulins and diabetic devices. The data collected from these companies were then validated by members of the SWEET consortium. RESULTS: We collected data from 29 European countries, whereas all types of insulins are mostly fully covered, heterogeneity was observed regarding the reimbursement of strips for glucometers (from 90 strips/month to no limit). CSII is readily available in 20 of 29 countries. Seven countries reported significant quota issues or obstacles for CSII prescription, and two countries had no CSII reimbursement. CGM is at least partially reimbursed in 17 of 29 countries. The comparison with the 2009 study showed an increasing availability of CSII and CGM across the EU. CONCLUSIONS: Although innovative diabetes technology is available, a large proportion of children with T1D still do not benefit from it due to its limited reimbursement.
- Klíčová slova
- children, diabetes technology, reimbursement, type 1 diabetes,
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 1. typu krev farmakoterapie ekonomika epidemiologie MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hypoglykemika aplikace a dávkování ekonomika MeSH
- inzulin aplikace a dávkování ekonomika MeSH
- inzulinové infuzní systémy ekonomika MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- krevní glukóza analýza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- longitudinální studie MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- náklady a analýza nákladů MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- osobní újma zaviněná nemocí MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- selfmonitoring glykemie ekonomika přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- úhrada zdravotního pojištění * ekonomika statistika a číselné údaje trendy MeSH
- vynálezy ekonomika statistika a číselné údaje trendy MeSH
- zdravotnické prostředky ekonomika MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa epidemiologie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- hypoglykemika MeSH
- inzulin MeSH
- krevní glukóza MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of underweight (UW), overweight (OW), and obesity in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: An international cross-sectional study including 23 026 T1D children (2-18 years, duration of diabetes ≥1 year) participating in the SWEET prospective, multicenter diabetes registry. Body mass index SD score (BMI-SDS) was calculated using the World Health Organization BMI charts. Children were categorized as UW (BMI-SDS < -2SD), OW (+1SD < BMI-SDS ≤ +2SD), and obese (OB) (BMI-SDS > +2SD). Hierarchic regression models were applied with adjustment for sex, age, and duration of diabetes. RESULTS: The prevalence of UW, OW, and obesity was: 1.4%, 22.3%, and 7.3% in males and 0.6%, 27.2%, and 6.8% in females. Adjusted BMI-SDS was significantly higher in females than in males (mean ± SEM: 0.54 ± 0.05 vs 0.40 ± 0.05, P < 0.0001). In males, BMI-SDS significantly decreased by age (P < 0.0001) in the first three age categories 0.61 ± 0.06 (2 to <10 years), 0.47 ± 0.06 (10 to <13 years), 0.34 ± 0.05 (13 to <16 years). In females, BMI-SDS showed a U-shaped distribution by age (P < 0.0001): 0.54 ± 0.04 (2 to <10 years), 0.39 ± 0.04 (10 to <13 years), 0.55 ± 0.04 (13 to <16 years). BMI-SDS increased by diabetes duration (<2 years: 0.38 ± 0.05, 2 to <5 years: 0.44 ± 0.05, and ≥5 years: 0.50 ± 0.05, P < 0.0001). Treatment modality did not affect BMI-SDS. Adjusted HbA1c was significantly higher in females than in males (8.20% ± 0.10% vs 8.06% ± 0.10%, P < 0.0001). In both genders, the association between HbA1c and BMI-SDS was U-shaped with the highest HbA1c in the UW and obesity groups. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of OW and obesity (31.8%) emphasize the need for developing further strategies to prevent and treat excess fat accumulation in T1D.
- Klíčová slova
- children, obesity, overweight, prevalence, type 1 diabetes,
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 1. typu komplikace epidemiologie MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- hubenost epidemiologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- obezita komplikace epidemiologie MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- prevalence MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- registrace * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Training for healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Europe who care for children and young people (CYP) with type 1 diabetes and their families is variable depending on the country. Building on the work of SWEET (Better control in Pediatric and Adolescent diabeteS: Working to crEate CEnTers of Reference) and using the German Certified Diabetes Educators (CDEs) curriculum, a European collaboration of pediatric diabetes experts aimed to (1) establish current core elements that should be included in a pediatric diabetes education training course and (2) create a template for a European CDE's training curriculum. METHODS: A qualitative methodology incorporating a survey questionnaire, focus group discussions, individual semi-structured interviews and workshops was employed to explore participants' experiences and opinions. HCPs-pediatric consultants, diabetes nurses, dietitians and psychologists, national and local diabetes leads, academic and education leads and children, and young people with diabetes and families took part in the study. The total number of participants equaled 186. RESULTS: A template for a European Certified Diabetes Educator Curriculum (EU-CDEC) was developed based on the themes that emerged from the participants' expertise and experiences. This provides a model for HCPs' pediatric diabetes training provision. CONCLUSIONS: There is a severe shortage of high quality, standardized training for HCPs across the majority of European countries. Lack of trained HCPs for CYP with diabetes will result in the delivery of suboptimal care and impact on health, wellbeing and clinical and psychological outcomes. The EU-CDEC template can be used to increase access to high quality training provision for all HCPs across Europe and worldwide.
- Klíčová slova
- education, healthcare professionals, pediatrics, training, type 1 diabetes,
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 1. typu * MeSH
- edukační sestry výchova MeSH
- kontinuální vzdělávání lékařů * MeSH
- kurikulum MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- oprávnění k praxi MeSH
- pediatrie výchova MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: It is known that the systems of pediatric diabetes care differ across the member states of the European Union (EU). The aim of this project was to characterize some of the main differences among the national systems. METHODS: Data were collected using two questionnaires. The first one was distributed among leading centers of pediatric diabetes (one per country) with the aim of establishing an overview of the systems, national policies, quality control (QC) and financing of pediatric diabetes care. Responses were received from all 27 EU countries. The second questionnaire was widely disseminated among all 354 International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes members with a domicile in an EU country; it included questions related to individual pediatric diabetes centers. A total of 108 datasets were collected and processed from healthcare professionals who were treating more than 29 000 children and adolescents with diabetes. Data on the reimbursement policies were verified by representatives of the pharmaceutical and medical device companies. RESULTS: The collected data reflect the situation in 2009. There was a notable heterogeneity among the systems for provision of pediatric diabetes care across the EU. Only 20/27 EU countries had a pediatric diabetes register. Nineteen countries had officially recognized centers for pediatric diabetes, but only nine of them had defined criteria for becoming such a center. A system for QC of pediatric diabetes at the national level was reported in 7/26 countries. Reimbursement for treatment varied significantly across the EU, potentially causing inequalities in access to modern technologies. CONCLUSIONS: The collected data help develop strategies toward improving equity and access to modern pediatric diabetes care across Europe.
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus epidemiologie mortalita terapie MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- endokrinologie metody organizace a řízení normy MeSH
- Evropská unie organizace a řízení statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- internacionalita MeSH
- kvalita zdravotní péče MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- pediatrie metody organizace a řízení normy MeSH
- poskytování zdravotní péče * metody organizace a řízení normy MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- referenční standardy MeSH
- studium lékařství metody organizace a řízení MeSH
- zdravotnický personál normy statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- zeměpis MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH