OBJECTIVES: Rituximab is being increasingly prescribed for the treatment of autoimmune glomerular diseases. While it is highly effective for some diseases, the response is less predictable for others, which may be due to differing requirements in terms of the dosing according to the disease type and variations concerning exposure to the drug. METHODS: We compiled novel rituximab dosing schedules according to pharmacokinetic analysis of data gathered from rituximab treated patients in a tertiary referral nephrology centre between May 2020 and June 2023. The population-pharmacokinetic analysis was based on the rituximab dosing, the patients' characteristics, rituximab levels and anti-rituximab antibodies. RESULTS: The analysis, which was based on data from 185 patients, clearly highlighted differing rituximab dosing requirements for patients with ANCA associated vasculitis and minimal change disease compared to those with membranous nephropathy, focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis and lupus nephritis. This corresponded to the good treatment response of the first two diseases and the unreliable efficacy for the others. The model predicts the rituximab pharmacokinetics with high degree of accuracy when body weight, proteinuria, type of glomerulonephritis, treatment length and anti-rituximab antibodies formation are used as covariates. We proposed a dosing schedule with shortened dosing intervals for difficult-to-treat diagnoses with high proteinuria. CONCLUSION: In order to ensure reliable and comparable exposure of rituximab with respect to the full range of glomerular diseases, the dosing schedule should be adjusted for membranous nephropathy, focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis and lupus nephritis. This is largely, but not solely, due to the enhanced level of unselective proteinuria in these diseases.

• Klíčová slova
• ANCA associated vasculitis, Focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis, Lupus nephritis, Membranous nephropathy, Minimal change disease, Nephrotic syndrome, Proteinuria,
• MeSH
• biologické modely MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• glomerulonefritida farmakoterapie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• membranózní glomerulonefritida farmakoterapie   MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• rituximab * farmakokinetika   aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• rozvrh dávkování léků MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• rituximab * MeSH

BACKGROUND: Studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and advanced follicular lymphoma have shown that CT-P10, a rituximab biosimilar, has equivalent or non-inferior efficacy and pharmacokinetics to rituximab. We aimed to assess the therapeutic equivalence of single-agent CT-P10 and rituximab in patients with newly diagnosed low-tumour burden follicular lymphoma. METHODS: In this ongoing, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, phase 3 trial, adult patients (≥18 years) with stage II-IV low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive web or voice response system stratified by region, stage, and age to CT-P10 or US-sourced rituximab. Patients received CT-P10 or rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenous) on day 1 of four 7-day cycles (induction period). Patients who had disease control after the induction period continued to a maintenance period of CT-P10 or rituximab administered every 8 weeks for six cycles and, if completed, a second year of maintenance therapy of additional CT-P10 (every 8 weeks for six cycles) was offered. The study was partially unmasked after database lock (Feb 23, 2018) for all data up to 7 months (before cycle 3 of the maintenance period). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an overall response by 7 months in the intention-to-treat population. Efficacy equivalence was shown if the two-sided 90% CIs for the treatment difference in the proportion of responders between CT-P10 and rituximab was within the equivalence margin of 17%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02260804. FINDINGS: Between Nov 9, 2015, and Jan 4, 2018, 402 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 258 were randomly assigned: 130 to CT-P10 and 128 to rituximab. 108 (83%) of 130 patients assigned to CT-P10 and 104 (81%) of 128 assigned to rituximab achieved an overall response by month 7 (treatment difference estimate 1·8%; 90% CI -6·43 to 10·20). Therapeutic equivalence was shown (90% CIs were within the prespecified margin of 17%). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (two grade 3 in the CT-P10 group) and neutropenia (one in each group); all other grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in one patient each. Six (5%) of 130 patients who received CT-P10 and three (2%) of 128 who received rituximab experienced at least one treatment-emergent serious adverse event. INTERPRETATION: CT-P10 was equivalent to rituximab in terms of efficacy and was well tolerated. CT-P10 monotherapy is suggested as a new therapeutic option for patients with low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma. FUNDING: Celltrion, Inc.

• MeSH
• bezpečnost * MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• folikulární lymfom farmakoterapie   metabolismus   patologie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• myší monoklonální protilátky škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
• rituximab škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• tumor burden * účinky léků   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky MeSH
• CT-P10 MeSH Prohlížeč
• myší monoklonální protilátky MeSH
• rituximab MeSH

BACKGROUND: Part one of the two-part SAWYER study predicted that subcutaneous rituximab 1600 mg would achieve trough serum concentrations that were non-inferior to those achieved with intravenous rituximab 500 mg/m(2) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. In part two of the study, we aimed to confirm the pharmacokinetic non-inferiority of subcutaneous rituximab, and investigate its safety and efficacy. METHODS: We did this phase 1b, open-label, randomised controlled non-inferiority study at 68 centres in 19 countries in Europe, North America, South America, and Australasia. Patients aged 18 years or older with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia were randomly assigned, via an interactive voice-response system with a permuted block randomisation scheme (block size of ten), to receive subcutaneous rituximab 1600 mg or intravenous rituximab 500 mg/m(2) plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. In cycle one, all patients received intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m(2). Randomisation was stratified by Binet stage and fludarabine and cyclophosphamide administration route (oral vs intravenous). Study investigators and patients were not masked to group allocation, but allocation was concealed from the statistician, clinical scientist, and clinical pharmacologist. The primary endpoint was trough serum concentration at cycle five, with a non-inferiority margin of 0·8 for the adjusted geometric mean ratio of the subcutaneous to the intravenous dose. We did the primary analysis in patients in the intention-to-treat population with complete pharmacokinetic data (pharmacokinetic population). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01292603, and is ongoing, although the treatment stage is now complete. FINDINGS: Between Aug 20, 2012, and June 17, 2013, we randomly assigned 176 patients to receive subcutaneous rituximab (n=88) or intravenous rituximab (n=88); 134 (76%) patients comprised the pharmacokinetic population. As of May 7, 2014, median follow-up was 13·9 months (IQR 11·9-16·0) for patients in the subcutaneous group and 14·1 months (11·6-16·5) for patients in the intravenous group. At cycle five, the geometric mean trough serum concentration in patients given subcutaneous rituximab was non-inferior to that in patients given intravenous rituximab (97·5 μg/mL vs 61·5 μg/mL), with an adjusted geometric mean ratio of 1·53 (90% CI 1·27-1·85). In the safety analysis, the proportion of patients reporting adverse events was similar between the subcutaneous and intravenous groups (all grades: 82 [96%] of 85 patients and 81 [91%] of 89 patients; serious adverse events: 25 [29%] and 29 [33%] patients; grade ≥3: 59 [69%] and 63 [71%] patients, respectively). The most common adverse event of grade 3 or higher was neutropenia (48 [56%] patients in the subcutaneous group and 46 [52%] patients in the intravenous group); the most common serious adverse event was febrile neutropenia (n=9 [11%] and n=4 [4%], respectively). We recorded administration-related reactions in 37 (44%) patients given subcutaneous rituximab and 40 (45%) patients given the intravenous dose, with differences between administration routes for injection-site erythema (n=10 [12%] and n=0, respectively) and nausea (n=2 [2%] and n=11 [12%], respectively). More patients reported local cutaneous reactions after subcutaneous rituximab (n=36 [42%]) than after intravenous rituximab (n=2 [2%]); most of these reactions were grade 1 or 2. INTERPRETATION: When combined with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, subcutaneous rituximab 1600 mg achieved trough serum concentrations that were pharmacokinetically non-inferior to those achieved with intravenous rituximab 500 mg/m(2), with a similar safety and efficacy profile between the two groups. Treatment with subcutaneous rituximab should allow patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia to receive clinical benefit from the drug via a more convenient delivery method than the intravenous route, and might also be used in combination regimens with approved and emerging oral regimens. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

• MeSH
• alkylační protinádorové látky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• aplikace kožní MeSH
• chronická lymfatická leukemie farmakoterapie   MeSH
• cyklofosfamid aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• intravenózní podání MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• protinádorové látky * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie MeSH
• rituximab * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• vidarabin aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   analogy a deriváty   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze I MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• alkylační protinádorové látky MeSH
• cyklofosfamid MeSH
• fludarabine MeSH Prohlížeč
• protinádorové látky * MeSH
• rituximab * MeSH
• vidarabin MeSH