Transposable elements (TEs) have been seen as selfish genetic elements that can propagate in a host genome. Their propagation success is however hindered by a combination of mechanisms such as mutations, selection, and their epigenetic silencing by the host genome. As a result, most copies of TEs in a given genome are dead relics: their sequence is too degenerated to allow any transposition. Nevertheless, these TE relics often, but not always, remain epigenetically silenced, and if not to prevent transposition anymore, one can wonder the reason for this phenomenon. The mere self-perpetuating loop inherent to epigenetic silencing could alone explain that even when inactive, TE copies remain silenced. Beyond this process, nevertheless, antagonistic selective forces are likely to act on TE relic silencing. Especially, without the benefit of preventing transposition, TE relic silencing may prove deleterious to the host fitness, suggesting that the maintenance of TE relic silencing is the result of a fine, and perhaps case-by-case, evolutionary trade-off between beneficial and deleterious effects. Ultimately, the release of TE relics silencing may provide a 'safe' ground for adaptive epimutations to arise. In this review, we provide an overview of these questions in both plants and animals.

• Keywords
• Transposable elements, adaptive epimutations, epigenetic silencing, gene regulation, host genome defence, recombination, transposable elements relics,
• MeSH
• Epigenesis, Genetic MeSH
• DNA Methylation MeSH
• Evolution, Molecular MeSH
• DNA Transposable Elements * MeSH
• Gene Silencing * MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Review MeSH
• Names of Substances
• DNA Transposable Elements * MeSH

BACKGROUND: High-throughput sequencing (HTS) has revolutionized the way in which epigenetic research is conducted. When coupled with fully-sequenced genomes, millions of small RNA (sRNA) reads are mapped to regions of interest and the results scrutinized for clues about epigenetic mechanisms. However, this approach requires careful consideration in regards to experimental design, especially when one investigates repetitive parts of genomes such as transposable elements (TEs), or when such genomes are large, as is often the case in plants. RESULTS: Here, in an attempt to shed light on complications of mapping sRNAs to TEs, we focus on the 2,300 Mb maize genome, 85% of which is derived from TEs, and scrutinize methodological strategies that are commonly employed in TE studies. These include choices for the reference dataset, the normalization of multiply mapping sRNAs, and the selection among sRNA metrics. We further examine how these choices influence the relationship between sRNAs and the critical feature of TE age, and contrast their effect on low copy genomic regions and other popular HTS data. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our analyses, we share a series of take-home messages that may help with the design, implementation, and interpretation of high-throughput TE epigenetic studies specifically, but our conclusions may also apply to any work that involves analysis of HTS data.

• Keywords
• Annotation, Bioinformatics, Genome mapping, High-throughput sequencing, RNA-seq, Small RNAs, Transposable elements, siRNAs,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH