• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

PURPOSE: CheckMate 914 is a two-part, randomized phase III trial evaluating adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (part A) or adjuvant nivolumab monotherapy (part B) versus placebo in mutually exclusive populations of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of postnephrectomy recurrence. Part A showed no disease-free survival (DFS) benefit for adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. We report results from part B. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (2:1:1) to nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks for up to 12 doses), placebo, or nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks for up to 12 doses) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks for up to four doses). The planned treatment duration was 24 weeks (approximately 5.5 months). The primary end point was DFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) for nivolumab versus placebo; safety was a secondary end point. RESULTS: Overall, 825 patients were randomly assigned to nivolumab (n = 411), placebo (n = 208), or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 206). With a median follow-up of 27.0 months (range, 18.0-42.4), the primary end point of improved DFS per BICR with nivolumab versus placebo was not met (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.21]; P = .40); the median DFS was not reached in either arm, and 18-month DFS rates were 78.4% versus 75.4%. The HR for DFS per investigator was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.58 to 1.12; P = .19). Grade 3-4 all-cause adverse events (AEs) occurred in 17.2%, 15.0%, and 28.9% of patients with nivolumab, placebo, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab, respectively. Any-grade treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation in 9.6%, 1.0%, and 28.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Part B of CheckMate 914 did not meet the primary end point of improved DFS for nivolumab versus placebo in patients with localized RCC at high risk of postnephrectomy recurrence.

• MeSH
• adjuvantní chemoterapie MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• ipilimumab * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * farmakoterapie   chirurgie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru * MeSH
• nádory ledvin * farmakoterapie   patologie   chirurgie   MeSH
• nefrektomie * MeSH
• nivolumab * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• přežití po terapii bez příznaků nemoci MeSH
• protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• ipilimumab * MeSH
• nivolumab * MeSH

CONTEXT: Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently emerged as guideline-recommended treatments of high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC). However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal candidates and the differential efficacy of adjuvant ICI regimens. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant ICIs for high-risk MIUC using updated data from phase III randomized controlled trials. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In April 2024, three databases were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials that evaluated oncologic outcomes in patients with MIUC treated with adjuvant ICIs. Pairwise meta-analysis (MA) and network meta-analyses were performed to compare the hazard ratios of oncological outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of predefined clinicopathological features. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Three randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab were included in the MAs and network meta-analyses groups. Pairwise MAs showed that treatment with adjuvant ICIs significantly improved DFS [hazards ratio: 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.90] as well as OS (hazards ratio: 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-1.00) in patients with MIUC compared with in the placebo/observation group. The DFS benefit was prominent in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.041) and in those with bladder cancer (P = 0.013) but did not differ across programmed death-ligand 1 and lymph node status. Adjuvant ICI therapy was associated with increased risk of any (OR: 2.98, 95% CI 2.06-4.33) and severe adverse events (OR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.49-2.13). The treatment rankings revealed that pembrolizumab for DFS (84%) and nivolumab for OS (93%) had the highest likelihood of improving survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses demonstrated the DFS and OS benefits of adjuvant ICIs for high-risk MIUC. Furthermore, patients with bladder cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy appeared to be the optimal candidates for adjuvant ICIs regarding prolonged DFS. Adjuvant ICIs are the standard of care for high-risk MIUC, and differential clinical behaviors and efficacy will enrich clinical decision-making.

• MeSH
• adjuvantní chemoterapie metody   MeSH
• inhibitory kontrolních bodů * terapeutické užití   farmakologie   MeSH
• invazivní růst nádoru MeSH
• karcinom z přechodných buněk farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• síťová metaanalýza MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• metaanalýza MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH
• Názvy látek
• inhibitory kontrolních bodů * MeSH

INTRODUCTION: Platinum-based chemotherapy followed by the immune checkpoint inhibitor avelumab represents an intensified upfront therapy regimen that may result in significant downstaging and, subsequently, potentially radical robotic nephroureterectomy with a lymph node dissection, an uncommon approach with an unexpectedly favorable outcome. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 70-year-old female presented with a sizeable cN2+ tumor of the left renal pelvis and achieved deep partial radiologic response after systemic therapy with four cycles of gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance therapy and subsequent robotic resection of the tumor. The patient continued with adjuvant nivolumab therapy once recovered after surgery and remained tumor-free on the subsequent follow-up. The systemic treatment was without any severe adverse reaction. CONCLUSION: We highlight the feasibility of the upfront systemic therapy with four cycles of gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance, robotic-assisted removal of the tumor, and adjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab. This intensification of the upfront systemic therapy, and the actual treatment sequence significantly increase the chances of prolonged survival or even a cure. This type of personalized therapeutic approach can accelerate future advanced immunotherapeutic strategies.

• Klíčová slova
• UTUC, cancer-specific survival, immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radical nephroureterectomy, upper urinary tract carcinoma,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• kazuistiky MeSH

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed previous treatment paradigm of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). The ARON-2 study (NCT05290038) aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness of pembrolizumab in patients recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients with documented metastatic UC treated by pembrolizumab as second-line therapy were retrospectively collected from 88 institutions in 23 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). Cox proportional hazards models were adopted to explore the presence of prognostic factors. RESULTS: In total, 836 patients were included: 544 patients (65%) received pembrolizumab after progression to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (cohort A) and 292 (35%) after recurring within < 12 months since the completion of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cohort B). The median follow-up time was 15.3 months. The median OS and the ORR were 10.5 months and 31% in the overall study population, 9.1 months and 29% in cohort A and 14.6 months and 37% in cohort B. At multivariate analysis, ECOG-PS ≥ 2, bone metastases, liver metastases and pembrolizumab setting (cohort A vs B) proved to be significantly associated with worst OS and PFS. Stratified by the presence of 0, 1-2 or 3-4 prognostic factors, the median OS was 29.4, 12.5 and 4.1 months (p < 0.001), while the median PFS was 12.2, 6.4 and 2.8 months, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that pembrolizumab is effective in the advanced UC real-world context, showing outcome differences between patients recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.

• Klíčová slova
• ARON-2 study, Pembrolizumab, Real-world data, Survival, Tumor response, Urothelial cancer,
• MeSH
• adjuvancia imunologická MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
• karcinom z přechodných buněk * MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře * MeSH
• platina MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinická studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• adjuvancia imunologická MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
• pembrolizumab MeSH Prohlížeč
• platina MeSH

PURPOSE: There is a significant unmet need for new and efficacious therapies in urothelial cancer (UC). To provide recommendations on appropriate clinical trial designs across disease settings in UC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) and the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) convened a multidisciplinary, international consensus panel. METHODS: Through open communication and scientific debate in small- and whole-group settings, surveying, and responses to clinical questionnaires, the consensus panel developed recommendations on optimal definitions of the disease state, end points, trial design, evaluations, sample size calculations, and pathology considerations for definitive studies in low- and intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), high-risk NMIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and metastatic UC. The expert panel also solicited input on the recommendations through presentations and public discussion during an open session at the 2021 Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) Think Tank (held virtually). RESULTS: The consensus panel developed a set of stage-specific bladder cancer clinical trial design recommendations, which are summarized in the table that accompanies this text. CONCLUSION: These recommendations developed by the SITC-IBCG Bladder Cancer Clinical Trial Design consensus panel will encourage uniformity among studies and facilitate drug development in this disease.

• MeSH
• adjuvancia imunologická terapeutické užití   MeSH
• imunoterapie MeSH
• karcinom z přechodných buněk * MeSH
• klinické zkoušky jako téma MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře * patologie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• adjuvancia imunologická MeSH

PURPOSE: To analyze and summarize the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) alone or in combination therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) stratified by sex. METHODS: Three databases were queried in October 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing RCC and UC patients treated with ICIs. We analyzed the association between sex and the efficacy of ICIs in RCC and UC patients across several clinical settings. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival for the metastatic setting and disease-free survival (DFS) for the adjuvant setting. RESULTS: Overall, 16 RCTs were included for meta-analyses and network meta-analyses. In the first-line treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC) and UC (mUC) patients, ICI-based combination therapies significantly improved OS compared to the current standard of care, regardless of sex. Adjuvant ICI monotherapy reduced the risk of disease recurrence in female patients with locally advanced RCC (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.93) but not in male patients, and, conversely, in male patients with muscle-invasive UC (pooled HR: 0.80, 95%CI 0.68-0.94) but not in female patients. Treatment ranking analyses in the first-line treatment of mRCC and mUC showed different results between sexes. Of note, regarding adjuvant treatment for RCC, pembrolizumab (99%) had the highest likelihood of improved DFS in males, whereas atezolizumab (84%) in females. CONCLUSIONS: OS benefit of first-line ICI-based combination therapy was seen in mRCC and mUC patients regardless of sex. Sex-based recommendations for ICI-based regimens according to the clinical setting may help guide clinical decision-making.

• Klíčová slova
• Adjuvant, Advanced, Gender, Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Metastatic, Renal cell carcinoma, Sex, Urothelial carcinoma,
• MeSH
• adjuvancia imunologická MeSH
• inhibitory kontrolních bodů terapeutické užití   MeSH
• karcinom z přechodných buněk * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• ledviny MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru MeSH
• nádory ledvin * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře * MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• metaanalýza MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH
• Názvy látek
• adjuvancia imunologická MeSH
• inhibitory kontrolních bodů MeSH

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although lymph node dissection (LND) during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is recommended for high-risk nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), adherence to guidelines remains insufficient in clinical practice. Therefore, this review aims to comprehensively summarize the current evidence regarding the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic impact of LND during RNU in UTUC patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical nodal staging using conventional CT scan has low sensitivity (25%) and diagnostic accuracy [area under the curve (AUC): 0.58] in UTUC, suggesting the importance of LND for obtaining accurate N-staging. Patients with pathological node-positive (pN+) disease have poor disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) compared with those with pN0. In addition, population-based studies showed that patients who underwent LND improved CSS and OS than those who did not, even in patients who received adjuvant systemic therapy. The number of lymph nodes removed has also been shown to be associated with improved CSS and OS, even in pT0 patients. Template-based LND should be performed as the extent of lymph node is more important than the number of lymph nodes. Robot-assisted RNU may facilitate performing a meticulous LND compared with a laparoscopic approach. Postoperative complications such as lymphatic and/or chylous leakage are increased but adequately manageable. However, the current evidence is not supported by high-quality studies. SUMMARY: Based on the published data, LND during RNU is a standard procedure for high-risk nonmetastatic UTUC, owing to its diagnostic, staging, prognostic, and, potentially, therapeutic benefits. Template-based LND should be offered to all patients who are planned for RNU for high-risk nonmetastatic UTUC. Patients with pN+ disease are optimal candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy. Robot-assisted RNU may facilitate meticulous LND compared with laparoscopic RNU.

• MeSH
• karcinom z přechodných buněk * patologie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lymfadenektomie škodlivé účinky   metody   MeSH
• lymfatické uzliny diagnostické zobrazování   chirurgie   patologie   MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře * patologie   MeSH
• nádory močovodu * chirurgie   MeSH
• nefroureterektomie metody   MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• přehledy MeSH

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant treatment has always been a cornerstone in the therapeutic approach of many cancers, considering its role in reducing the risk of relapse and, in some cases, increasing overall survival. Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors have been tested in different malignancies. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis aimed to explore the impact of adjuvant PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors on relapse-free survival (RFS) in cancer patients enrolled in randomized controlled clinical trials. We retrieved all phase III trials published from 15 June 2008 to 15 May 2022, evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy as an adjuvant treatment by searching on EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed/ Medline, and international oncological meetings' abstracts. The outcome of interest was RFS. We also performed subgroup analyses focused on age and gender. RESULTS: Overall, 8 studies, involving more than 6000 patients, were included in the analysis. The pooled results highlighted that the use of adjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors may reduce the risk of relapse compared to control treatments (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence intervals, 0.67-0.78). In addition, the subgroup analyses observed that this benefit was consistent in different patient populations, including male, female, younger, and older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment is associated with an increased RFS in the overall population and in subgroups divided according to age and gender.

• Klíčová slova
• PD-1, adjuvant, immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy, relapse-free survival,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• přehledy MeSH

PURPOSE: to compare observed overall survival vs age-adjusted lifetable (LT) derived life expectancy (LE) in metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (MBCa) patients according to race/ethnicity. METHODS: We identified Caucasian, African American, Hispanic/Latino and Asian metastatic urothelial bladder cancer patients from 2004 to 2011 within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Social Security Administration tables were used to compute 5 year LE. LT-derived LE was compared to observed overall survival OS. Additionally, we relied on Poisson regression plots to display cancer-specific mortality (CSM) relative to other-cause mortality (OCM) for each race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Overall, 2286 MBCa patients were identified. Of those, 1800 (79%) were Caucasian vs 212 (9.3%) African American vs 189 (8.3%) Hispanic/Latino vs 85 (3.7%) Asians. The median age at diagnosis was 71 years for Asians vs 70 for Caucasians vs 67 for Hispanic/Latinos vs 67 for African Americans. African Americans showed the biggest difference between observed OS and LT-predicted LE at five years (- 83.8%), followed by Hispanic/Latinos (- 81%), Caucasians (- 77%) and Asian patients (- 69%). In Poisson regression plots, Hispanic/Latinos displayed the highest cancer-specific mortality rate (88%), while African/Americans showed the highest other cause mortality rate (12%). Conversely, Asian patients displayed the lowest CSM rate (83%) and second lowest OCM rate (7%). CONCLUSIONS: African Americans showed the least favorable survival profile in MBCa, despite being youngest at diagnosis. Contrarily, Asians displayed the best survival profile in MBCa, despite being oldest at diagnosis.

• Klíčová slova
• Life expectancy, Life table, Metastatic bladder cancer, SEER, Social security administration, Surveillance,
• MeSH
• běloši MeSH
• černoši nebo Afroameričané MeSH
• etnicita MeSH
• karcinom z přechodných buněk * MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• naděje dožití MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře * MeSH
• program SEER MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH