Complex functioning of the genome in the cell nucleus is controlled at different levels: (a) the DNA base sequence containing all relevant inherited information; (b) epigenetic pathways consisting of protein interactions and feedback loops; (c) the genome architecture and organization activating or suppressing genetic interactions between different parts of the genome. Most research so far has shed light on the puzzle pieces at these levels. This article, however, attempts an integrative approach to genome expression regulation incorporating these different layers. Under environmental stress or during cell development, differentiation towards specialized cell types, or to dysfunctional tumor, the cell nucleus seems to react as a whole through coordinated changes at all levels of control. This implies the need for a framework in which biological, chemical, and physical manifestations can serve as a basis for a coherent theory of gene self-organization. An international symposium held at the Biomedical Research and Study Center in Riga, Latvia, on 25 July 2022 addressed novel aspects of the abovementioned topic. The present article reviews the most recent results and conclusions of the state-of-the-art research in this multidisciplinary field of science, which were delivered and discussed by scholars at the Riga symposium.

• Keywords
• database pattern analysis, dynamic genome organization, epigenetic interactions, fluorescence microscopy, gene activity oscillations, heterochromatin and self-organization, nucleotide k-mers, organizational and functional networks, topological genome analysis, transposon-effected regulation,
• MeSH
• Cell Differentiation genetics   MeSH
• Cell Nucleus * metabolism   MeSH
• Genome * MeSH
• Publication type
• Congress MeSH
• Review MeSH

The study of embryonic stem cells is in the spotlight in many laboratories that study the structure and function of chromatin and epigenetic processes. The key properties of embryonic stem cells are their capacity for self-renewal and their pluripotency. Pluripotent stem cells are able to differentiate into the cells of all three germ layers, and because of this property they represent a promising therapeutic tool in the treatment of diseases such as Parkinson's disease and diabetes, or in the healing of lesions after heart attack. As the basic nuclear unit, chromatin is responsible for the regulation of the functional status of cells, including pluripotency and differentiation. Therefore, in this review we discuss the functional changes in chromatin during differentiation and the correlation between epigenetics events and the differentiation potential of embryonic stem cells. In particular we focus on post-translational histone modification, DNA methylation and the heterochromatin protein HP1 and its unique function in mouse and human embryonic stem cells.

• Keywords
• Chromatin, Differentiation, Embryonic stem cells, Epigenetics, Nucleus, Pluripotency,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

Epigenetic modifications, such as acetylation, phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, and ADP ribosylation, of the highly conserved core histones, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, influence the genetic potential of DNA. The enormous regulatory potential of histone modification is illustrated in the vast array of epigenetic markers found throughout the genome. More than the other types of histone modification, acetylation and methylation of specific lysine residues on N-terminal histone tails are fundamental for the formation of chromatin domains, such as euchromatin, and facultative and constitutive heterochromatin. In addition, the modification of histones can cause a region of chromatin to undergo nuclear compartmentalization and, as such, specific epigenetic markers are non-randomly distributed within interphase nuclei. In this review, we summarize the principles behind epigenetic compartmentalization and the functional consequences of chromatin arrangement within interphase nuclei.

• MeSH
• Acetylation MeSH
• Cell Nucleus metabolism   ultrastructure   MeSH
• Chromatin ultrastructure   MeSH
• Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone physiology   MeSH
• Epigenesis, Genetic MeSH
• Gene Expression MeSH
• Histones genetics   metabolism   MeSH
• Chromobox Protein Homolog 5 MeSH
• Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors MeSH
• Interphase MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Chromosomes, Human, X metabolism   MeSH
• Methylation MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Review MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Chromatin MeSH
• Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone MeSH
• Histones MeSH
• Chromobox Protein Homolog 5 MeSH
• Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors MeSH

The spatial arrangement of some genetic elements relative to chromosome territories and in parallel with the cell nucleus was investigated in human lymphocytes. The structure of the chromosome territories was studied in chromosomes containing regions (clusters) of highly expressed genes (HSA 9, 17) and those without such clusters (HSA 8, 13). In chromosomes containing highly expressed regions, the elements pertaining to these regions were found close to the centre of the nucleus on the inner sides of chromosome territories; those pertaining to regions with low expression were localized close to the nuclear membrane on the opposite sides of the territories. In chromosomes with generally low expression (HSA 8, 13), the elements investigated were found symmetrically distributed over the territories. Based on the investigations of the chromosome structure, the following conclusions are suggested: (1) Chromosome territories have a non-random internal 3D structure with defined average mutual positions between elements. For example, RARalpha, TP53 and Iso-q of HSA 17 are nearer to each other than they are to the HSA 17 centromere. (2) The structure of a chromosome territory reflects the number and chromosome location of clusters of highly expressed genes. (3) Chromosome territories behave to some extent as solid bodies: if the territory is found closer to the nuclear centre, the individual genetic elements of this chromosome are also found, on average, closer the centre of the nucleus. (4) The positions of centromeres are, on average, nearer to the fluorescence weight centre of the territory (FWCT) than to genes. (5) Active genes are not found near the centromeres of their own territory. A simple model of the structure of chromosome territory is proposed.

• MeSH
• Cell Nucleus genetics   MeSH
• Centromere genetics   MeSH
• Euchromatin genetics   MeSH
• Genes MeSH
• Heterochromatin genetics   MeSH
• In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence MeSH
• Nuclear Envelope genetics   MeSH
• Cell Compartmentation MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17 ultrastructure   MeSH
• Chromosomes, Human ultrastructure   MeSH
• Lymphocytes diagnostic imaging   MeSH
• Monte Carlo Method MeSH
• Models, Genetic MeSH
• Computer Simulation MeSH
• Image Processing, Computer-Assisted MeSH
• Ultrasonography MeSH
• Imaging, Three-Dimensional * MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Comparative Study MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Euchromatin MeSH
• Heterochromatin MeSH

Higher-order compartments of nuclear chromatin have been defined according to the replication timing, transcriptional activity, and information content (Ferreira et al. 1997, Sadoni et al. 1999). The results presented in this work contribute to this model of nuclear organization. Using different human blood cells, nuclear positioning of genes, centromeres, and whole chromosomes was investigated. Genes are located mostly in the interior of cell nuclei; centromeres are located near the nuclear periphery in agreement with the definition of the higher-order compartments. Genetic loci are found in specific subregions of cell nuclei which form distinct layers at defined centre-of-nucleus to locus distances. Inside these layers, the genetic loci are distributed randomly. Some chromosomes are polarized with genes located in the inner parts of the nucleus and centromere located on the nuclear periphery; polar organization was not found for some other chromosomes. The internal structure of the higher-order compartments as well as the polar and non-polar organization of chromosomes are basically conserved in different cell types and at various stages of the cell cycle. Some features of the nuclear structure are conserved even in differentiated cells and during cellular repair after irradiation, although shifted positioning of genetic loci was systematically observed during these processes.

• MeSH
• Cell Nucleus genetics   radiation effects   ultrastructure   MeSH
• Cell Cycle MeSH
• Bone Marrow Cells radiation effects   ultrastructure   MeSH
• Centromere radiation effects   MeSH
• Genes radiation effects   MeSH
• HL-60 Cells MeSH
• In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence MeSH
• Interphase MeSH
• Cell Compartmentation MeSH
• Leukopoiesis MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Chromosomes, Human radiation effects   MeSH
• Lymphocytes cytology   radiation effects   ultrastructure   MeSH
• U937 Cells MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH