• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of specificity and sensitivity of immunochemical and molecular techniques for reliable detection of Erwinia amylovora

Blanka Kokošková, Ivan Mráz, Jana Hýblová

. 2007 ; 52 (2) : 175-182.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc07502286

Erwinia amylovora [(BURRILL) WINSLOW et al.] (Ea), the causal agent of fire blight, was detected in plant samples and pure bacterial cultures by means of PCR, IFAS and ELISA. Polyclonal antibodies of Neogen Europe Ltd. were used for IFAS and PTA-ELISA and laboratory-generated primers EaF72 and EaR560 for PCR. Using the BIOLOG system and an immature pear fruit assay, identities of all Ea strains were confirmed as the fire blight bacterium. In assays of pure Ea cultures, PTA-ELISA, and both IFAS and PCR were sensitive to concentrations 10(6)-10(5) and 10(5)-10(4) CFU/mL, respectively. When saprophytic bacteria associated with Ea in plant samples were tested as potentially cross-reacting bacteria, PTA-ELISA and IFAS gave 20 and 14 % cross-reactions, respectively. In plant samples, the presence of Ea was more reliably detected by IFAS (at a dilution of 1 : 1000) than by PTA-ELISA (to dilution 1 : 100). The capacity to detect Ea might be increased using an optimized PCR, but for PCR prepared from infected plant samples it was necessary to use the bacterial DNA isolated with a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). In this case the PCR was sensitive to a concentration of 10(5) CFU/mL. PCR was much more specific than either immunochemical technique, because no false positives were observed when primers EaF72 and EaR560 were used.

Grant č. 0002 7006 603 Ministerstvo zemědělství České republiky -- Grant č. 1QA 5005 10558 -- Grant č. 505 10513 AV OZ

Bibliografie atd.

Lit.: 36

000      
03444naa 2200421 a 4500
001      
bmc07502286
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210121406.0
008      
080303s2007 xr e eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Kokošková, Blanka. $7 _BN002344
245    10
$a Comparison of specificity and sensitivity of immunochemical and molecular techniques for reliable detection of Erwinia amylovora / $c Blanka Kokošková, Ivan Mráz, Jana Hýblová
314    __
$a Department of Bacteriology, Plant Medicine Division, Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague
500    __
$a Grant č. 0002 7006 603 Ministerstvo zemědělství České republiky -- Grant č. 1QA 5005 10558 -- Grant č. 505 10513 AV OZ
504    __
$a Lit.: 36
520    9_
$a Erwinia amylovora [(BURRILL) WINSLOW et al.] (Ea), the causal agent of fire blight, was detected in plant samples and pure bacterial cultures by means of PCR, IFAS and ELISA. Polyclonal antibodies of Neogen Europe Ltd. were used for IFAS and PTA-ELISA and laboratory-generated primers EaF72 and EaR560 for PCR. Using the BIOLOG system and an immature pear fruit assay, identities of all Ea strains were confirmed as the fire blight bacterium. In assays of pure Ea cultures, PTA-ELISA, and both IFAS and PCR were sensitive to concentrations 10(6)-10(5) and 10(5)-10(4) CFU/mL, respectively. When saprophytic bacteria associated with Ea in plant samples were tested as potentially cross-reacting bacteria, PTA-ELISA and IFAS gave 20 and 14 % cross-reactions, respectively. In plant samples, the presence of Ea was more reliably detected by IFAS (at a dilution of 1 : 1000) than by PTA-ELISA (to dilution 1 : 100). The capacity to detect Ea might be increased using an optimized PCR, but for PCR prepared from infected plant samples it was necessary to use the bacterial DNA isolated with a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). In this case the PCR was sensitive to a concentration of 10(5) CFU/mL. PCR was much more specific than either immunochemical technique, because no false positives were observed when primers EaF72 and EaR560 were used.
650    _2
$a Erwinia amylovora $x chemie $x izolace a purifikace $7 D044084
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a polymerázová řetězová reakce $x metody $x využití $7 D016133
650    _2
$a fluorescenční protilátková technika nepřímá $x metody $x využití $7 D019084
650    _2
$a ELISA $x metody $x využití $7 D004797
650    _2
$a nemoci rostlin $x etiologie $x genetika $x mikrobiologie $7 D010935
650    _2
$a diagnostické techniky molekulární $x normy $x využití $7 D025202
650    _2
$a finanční podpora výzkumu jako téma $7 D012109
700    1_
$a Mráz, Ivan, $d 1960- $7 xx0035623
700    1_
$a Hýblová, Jana. $7 _BN002346
773    0_
$w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $g Roč. 52, č. 2 (2007), s. 175-182 $x 0015-5632
856    41
$u http://www.biomed.cas.cz/mbu/folia/
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 2403 $c 561 $y 1
990    __
$a 20080229114826 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20080312133727 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 617906 $s 470338
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2007 $b 52 $c 2 $d 175-182 $i 0015-5632 $m Folia microbiologica $x MED00011005
LZP    __
$a 2007-22/mkal

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...