-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of specificity and sensitivity of immunochemical and molecular techniques for reliable detection of Erwinia amylovora
Blanka Kokošková, Ivan Mráz, Jana Hýblová
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
- MeSH
- diagnostické techniky molekulární normy využití MeSH
- ELISA metody využití MeSH
- Erwinia amylovora chemie izolace a purifikace MeSH
- finanční podpora výzkumu jako téma MeSH
- fluorescenční protilátková technika nepřímá metody využití MeSH
- nemoci rostlin etiologie genetika mikrobiologie MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce metody využití MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
Erwinia amylovora [(BURRILL) WINSLOW et al.] (Ea), the causal agent of fire blight, was detected in plant samples and pure bacterial cultures by means of PCR, IFAS and ELISA. Polyclonal antibodies of Neogen Europe Ltd. were used for IFAS and PTA-ELISA and laboratory-generated primers EaF72 and EaR560 for PCR. Using the BIOLOG system and an immature pear fruit assay, identities of all Ea strains were confirmed as the fire blight bacterium. In assays of pure Ea cultures, PTA-ELISA, and both IFAS and PCR were sensitive to concentrations 10(6)-10(5) and 10(5)-10(4) CFU/mL, respectively. When saprophytic bacteria associated with Ea in plant samples were tested as potentially cross-reacting bacteria, PTA-ELISA and IFAS gave 20 and 14 % cross-reactions, respectively. In plant samples, the presence of Ea was more reliably detected by IFAS (at a dilution of 1 : 1000) than by PTA-ELISA (to dilution 1 : 100). The capacity to detect Ea might be increased using an optimized PCR, but for PCR prepared from infected plant samples it was necessary to use the bacterial DNA isolated with a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). In this case the PCR was sensitive to a concentration of 10(5) CFU/mL. PCR was much more specific than either immunochemical technique, because no false positives were observed when primers EaF72 and EaR560 were used.
Grant č. 0002 7006 603 Ministerstvo zemědělství České republiky -- Grant č. 1QA 5005 10558 -- Grant č. 505 10513 AV OZ
Bibliografie atd.Lit.: 36
- 000
- 03444naa 2200421 a 4500
- 001
- bmc07502286
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210121406.0
- 008
- 080303s2007 xr e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Kokošková, Blanka. $7 _BN002344
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of specificity and sensitivity of immunochemical and molecular techniques for reliable detection of Erwinia amylovora / $c Blanka Kokošková, Ivan Mráz, Jana Hýblová
- 314 __
- $a Department of Bacteriology, Plant Medicine Division, Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague
- 500 __
- $a Grant č. 0002 7006 603 Ministerstvo zemědělství České republiky -- Grant č. 1QA 5005 10558 -- Grant č. 505 10513 AV OZ
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 36
- 520 9_
- $a Erwinia amylovora [(BURRILL) WINSLOW et al.] (Ea), the causal agent of fire blight, was detected in plant samples and pure bacterial cultures by means of PCR, IFAS and ELISA. Polyclonal antibodies of Neogen Europe Ltd. were used for IFAS and PTA-ELISA and laboratory-generated primers EaF72 and EaR560 for PCR. Using the BIOLOG system and an immature pear fruit assay, identities of all Ea strains were confirmed as the fire blight bacterium. In assays of pure Ea cultures, PTA-ELISA, and both IFAS and PCR were sensitive to concentrations 10(6)-10(5) and 10(5)-10(4) CFU/mL, respectively. When saprophytic bacteria associated with Ea in plant samples were tested as potentially cross-reacting bacteria, PTA-ELISA and IFAS gave 20 and 14 % cross-reactions, respectively. In plant samples, the presence of Ea was more reliably detected by IFAS (at a dilution of 1 : 1000) than by PTA-ELISA (to dilution 1 : 100). The capacity to detect Ea might be increased using an optimized PCR, but for PCR prepared from infected plant samples it was necessary to use the bacterial DNA isolated with a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). In this case the PCR was sensitive to a concentration of 10(5) CFU/mL. PCR was much more specific than either immunochemical technique, because no false positives were observed when primers EaF72 and EaR560 were used.
- 650 _2
- $a Erwinia amylovora $x chemie $x izolace a purifikace $7 D044084
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a polymerázová řetězová reakce $x metody $x využití $7 D016133
- 650 _2
- $a fluorescenční protilátková technika nepřímá $x metody $x využití $7 D019084
- 650 _2
- $a ELISA $x metody $x využití $7 D004797
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci rostlin $x etiologie $x genetika $x mikrobiologie $7 D010935
- 650 _2
- $a diagnostické techniky molekulární $x normy $x využití $7 D025202
- 650 _2
- $a finanční podpora výzkumu jako téma $7 D012109
- 700 1_
- $a Mráz, Ivan, $d 1960- $7 xx0035623
- 700 1_
- $a Hýblová, Jana. $7 _BN002346
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $g Roč. 52, č. 2 (2007), s. 175-182 $x 0015-5632
- 856 41
- $u http://www.biomed.cas.cz/mbu/folia/
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 2403 $c 561 $y 1
- 990 __
- $a 20080229114826 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20080312133727 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 617906 $s 470338
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2007 $b 52 $c 2 $d 175-182 $i 0015-5632 $m Folia microbiologica $x MED00011005
- LZP __
- $a 2007-22/mkal