• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of different protocols for 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in healthy volunteers

Kopácová M, Bures J, Vorísek V, Konstacký M, Rejchrt S, Zivný P, Douda T, Palicka V.

Jazyk angličtina Země Norsko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc07506868
E-zdroje Online

NLK Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 1998-05-19 do Před 1 rokem

OBJECTIVE: The (13)C-urea breath test ((13)C-UBT) is the most accurate non-invasive method for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. However, several methodological issues have not been resolved yet. The aim of this study was to test different protocols of (13)C-UBT to find the optimal test drink and sampling interval. MATERIAL AND METHODS: (13)C-UBT was performed at 3-day intervals in 27 healthy volunteers using citric acid (test A), orange juice (B) and still water (C) as test drinks. Breath samples were collected from time 5 to 60 min. A total number of 2106 breath samples were analysed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (cut-off value 3.5). RESULTS: Differences in delta values were greater than would be expected by chance (A versus B and A versus C at times 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 min, p<0.05, Dunnett's method). There were no grey zone- or false-negative results among H. pylori-positive persons in test A at any time, but some were found in tests B and C. Optimal intervals for breath sampling are at times 20 or 25 min after (13)C-urea ingestion. CONCLUSIONS: Citric acid solution as a test drink and 20- or 25-min breath sampling intervals are optimal for the (13)C-UBT in healthy volunteers.

000      
03538naa 2200517 a 4500
001      
bmc07506868
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210122732.0
008      
080722s2005 no e eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a no
100    1_
$a Kopáčová, Marcela $7 xx0032944
245    10
$a Comparison of different protocols for 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in healthy volunteers / $c Kopácová M, Bures J, Vorísek V, Konstacký M, Rejchrt S, Zivný P, Douda T, Palicka V.
314    __
$a Second Department of Internal Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. kopacmar@fnhk.cz
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: The (13)C-urea breath test ((13)C-UBT) is the most accurate non-invasive method for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. However, several methodological issues have not been resolved yet. The aim of this study was to test different protocols of (13)C-UBT to find the optimal test drink and sampling interval. MATERIAL AND METHODS: (13)C-UBT was performed at 3-day intervals in 27 healthy volunteers using citric acid (test A), orange juice (B) and still water (C) as test drinks. Breath samples were collected from time 5 to 60 min. A total number of 2106 breath samples were analysed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (cut-off value 3.5). RESULTS: Differences in delta values were greater than would be expected by chance (A versus B and A versus C at times 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 min, p<0.05, Dunnett's method). There were no grey zone- or false-negative results among H. pylori-positive persons in test A at any time, but some were found in tests B and C. Optimal intervals for breath sampling are at times 20 or 25 min after (13)C-urea ingestion. CONCLUSIONS: Citric acid solution as a test drink and 20- or 25-min breath sampling intervals are optimal for the (13)C-UBT in healthy volunteers.
650    _2
$a dechové testy $x metody $7 D001944
650    _2
$a infekce vyvolané Helicobacter pylori $x diagnóza $7 D016481
650    _2
$a močovina $x diagnostické užití $7 D014508
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a izotopy uhlíku $7 D002247
650    _2
$a kyselina citronová $x aplikace a dávkování $x diagnostické užití $7 D019343
650    _2
$a Helicobacter pylori $x enzymologie $7 D016480
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a roztoky $7 D012996
650    _2
$a ureasa $x metabolismus $7 D014510
650    _2
$a hmotnostní spektrometrie $7 D013058
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Bureš, Jan, $d 1954- $7 nlk19990073060
700    1_
$a Voříšek, Viktor $7 xx0062745
700    1_
$a Konštacký, Michal, $d 1971- $7 mzk2004160706
700    1_
$a Rejchrt, Stanislav, $d 1963- $7 mzk2005306779
700    1_
$a Živný, Pavel, $d 1961- $7 mzk2006324255
700    1_
$a Douda, Tomáš, $7 xx0075783 $d 1970-
700    1_
$a Palička, Vladimír, $d 1946- $7 jn99240000830
773    0_
$w MED00010597 $t Scandinavian journal of clinical & laboratory investigation $g Roč. 65, č. 6 (2005), s. 491-498 $x 0036-5513
910    __
$y 1 $a ABA008 $b x
990    __
$a 20080721085927 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20081006155447 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 622476 $s 474909
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2005 $b 65 $c 6 $d 491-498 $i 0036-5513 $m Scandinavian journal of clinical & laboratory investigation $x MED00010597
LZP    __
$a 2008-Doreen

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...