• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Měli bychom u pacientů dlouhodobě užívajících clopidogrel použít vysoké sytící dávky?
[Dose effect of clopidogrel reloading in patients already on 75-mg maintenance dose: the reload with Clopidogrel before Coronary Angioplasty in Subjects Treated Long Term with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (RELOAD) study]

Jean-Philippe Colett, et al.

. 2008 ; 2 (6) : 44.

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc07521999

Clopidogrel loading has mostly been studied in clopidogrel-naive patients. Whether clopidogrel-treated patients readmitted for an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention can benefit from a new load of clopidogrel and at what dose remain unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of 3 different strategies of administration of a loading dose of 900 mg clopidogrel in patients already treated with a maintenance dose of 75 mg clopidogrel for at least 7 days on residual platelet aggregation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients treated long term by clopidogrel 75 mg/d were assigned to receive a first loading dose of 300, 600, or 900 mg clopidogrel and 4 hours later a second loading dose of 600, 300, or 0 mg, respectively, to achieve a total loading dose of 900 mg in all patients. Platelet aggregation was evaluated at baseline, at 4 hours after the initial load (and before second load), and at 24 hours using light transmission aggregometry with 20 micromol ADP and the point-of-care assay VerifyNow P2Y(12). The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the inhibition (relative change) of residual platelet aggregation (percentage of IRPA) between 600- and 900-mg first loading at 4 hours. IRPA at 24 hours also was evaluated as a secondary objective, as well as the rate of suboptimal response at 4 hours defined as IRPA <10%. We included 166 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes (n=80, 48%) or stable coronary artery disease (n=86, 52%). Baseline characteristics were similar in the 3 dose groups. A significant stepwise increase was found in percentage IRPA assessed at 4 hours in patients initially assigned to 300 versus 600 versus 900 mg (30.7% versus 40.3% versus 64.0%, respectively; P=0.0024). The difference in percentage IRPA at 4 hours was not significant between 300 and 600 mg but was significant between 600 and 900 mg and between 300 and 900 mg. Percentage IRPA assessed at 24 hours when all patients had received 900 mg did not differ between the 3 loading regimens. The rates of suboptimal response (IRPA <10% at 4 hours) were 23.6%, 20.4%, and 5.3% with 300, 600, and 900 mg, respectively (P=0.02 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated long term with 75 mg clopidogrel, a new loading dose of 900 mg improves IRPA and reduces poor and/or slow response to clopidogrel significantly more than that obtained with 300 or 600 mg.

Dose effect of clopidogrel reloading in patients already on 75-mg maintenance dose: the reload with Clopidogrel before Coronary Angioplasty in Subjects Treated Long Term with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (RELOAD) study

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc07521999
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210133045.0
008      
090423s2008 xr e cze||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Colett, Jean-Philippe
245    10
$a Měli bychom u pacientů dlouhodobě užívajících clopidogrel použít vysoké sytící dávky? / $c Jean-Philippe Colett, et al.
246    11
$a Dose effect of clopidogrel reloading in patients already on 75-mg maintenance dose: the reload with Clopidogrel before Coronary Angioplasty in Subjects Treated Long Term with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (RELOAD) study
314    __
$a Institut de Cardiologie, Pitié-Salpetriere University Hospital, Paris
520    9_
$a Clopidogrel loading has mostly been studied in clopidogrel-naive patients. Whether clopidogrel-treated patients readmitted for an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention can benefit from a new load of clopidogrel and at what dose remain unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of 3 different strategies of administration of a loading dose of 900 mg clopidogrel in patients already treated with a maintenance dose of 75 mg clopidogrel for at least 7 days on residual platelet aggregation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients treated long term by clopidogrel 75 mg/d were assigned to receive a first loading dose of 300, 600, or 900 mg clopidogrel and 4 hours later a second loading dose of 600, 300, or 0 mg, respectively, to achieve a total loading dose of 900 mg in all patients. Platelet aggregation was evaluated at baseline, at 4 hours after the initial load (and before second load), and at 24 hours using light transmission aggregometry with 20 micromol ADP and the point-of-care assay VerifyNow P2Y(12). The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the inhibition (relative change) of residual platelet aggregation (percentage of IRPA) between 600- and 900-mg first loading at 4 hours. IRPA at 24 hours also was evaluated as a secondary objective, as well as the rate of suboptimal response at 4 hours defined as IRPA <10%. We included 166 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes (n=80, 48%) or stable coronary artery disease (n=86, 52%). Baseline characteristics were similar in the 3 dose groups. A significant stepwise increase was found in percentage IRPA assessed at 4 hours in patients initially assigned to 300 versus 600 versus 900 mg (30.7% versus 40.3% versus 64.0%, respectively; P=0.0024). The difference in percentage IRPA at 4 hours was not significant between 300 and 600 mg but was significant between 600 and 900 mg and between 300 and 900 mg. Percentage IRPA assessed at 24 hours when all patients had received 900 mg did not differ between the 3 loading regimens. The rates of suboptimal response (IRPA <10% at 4 hours) were 23.6%, 20.4%, and 5.3% with 300, 600, and 900 mg, respectively (P=0.02 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated long term with 75 mg clopidogrel, a new loading dose of 900 mg improves IRPA and reduces poor and/or slow response to clopidogrel significantly more than that obtained with 300 or 600 mg.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a balónková koronární angioplastika $x metody $7 D015906
650    _2
$a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a agregace trombocytů $x fyziologie $x účinky léků $7 D010974
650    _2
$a inhibitory agregace trombocytů $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D010975
650    _2
$a tiklopidin $x analogy a deriváty $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D013988
650    _2
$a čas $7 D013995
773    0_
$w MED00012706 $t Clinical cardiology alert $g Roč. 2, č. 6 (2008), s. 44 $x 1213-2586
787    18
$w bmc07522000 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku Měli bychom u pacientů dlouhodobě užívajících clopidogrel použít vysoké sytící dávky?]
787    18
$w bmc07522018 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku Správné využívání záchranné služby (EMS)]
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2242 $c 407 a $y 9
990    __
$a 20090423140301 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20090601112225 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 645088 $s 498004
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 2 $c 6 $d 44 $i 1213-2586 $m Clinical Cardiology Alert $x MED00012706
LZP    __
$a 2009-15/mkme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...