-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Treatment of lupus nephritis with cyclosporine - an outcome analysis
Rihova Z, Vankova Z, Maixnerova D, Dostal C, Jancova E, Honsova E, Merta M, Rysava R, Tesar V
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky
Grantová podpora
NR8444
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Část
Zdroj
NLK
Karger Journals
od 1998-01-01 do 2009
ProQuest Central
od 1994-05-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2005-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1994-05-01 do Před 1 rokem
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1996
PubMed
17396037
DOI
10.1159/000101448
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- cyklosporin škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- imunosupresiva škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- longitudinální studie MeSH
- nefritida při lupus erythematodes farmakoterapie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
BACKGROUND: The optimal therapy for lupus nephritis (LN), including the role of cyclosporine (CsA), still lacks scientifically valid clinical experience. We evaluated the efficacy of CsA in the induction and maintenance treatment of patients with biopsy-proven LN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 31 patients (25 women, 6 men, mean age 29.5 years) were enrolled in the study. The majority had proliferative LN. The mean follow-up was 85.6 +/- 24.7 months. RESULTS: CsA was used as first-line treatment in 38.7% of patients and as second-line treatment in 61.3% of patients. Complete remission was achieved in 93.5% of patients. The relapse rate was 45.2%. The mean disease-free interval was 33 months. At the end of follow-up, a total of 67.9% of the patients were in remission. The treatment led to significant improvement in proteinuria (p = 0.001) and stabilization of renal function. CONCLUSION: CsA might be an appropriate and a less toxic alternative drug for LN both as a first-choice and rescue therapy.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc07526859
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20131014144907.0
- 008
- 090803s2007 sz e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 __
- $a 10.1159/000101448 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)17396037
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Říhová, Zuzana $7 pna2010563401
- 245 10
- $a Treatment of lupus nephritis with cyclosporine - an outcome analysis / $c Rihova Z, Vankova Z, Maixnerova D, Dostal C, Jancova E, Honsova E, Merta M, Rysava R, Tesar V
- 314 __
- $a Nephrology Unit, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. zrihova@centrum.cz
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The optimal therapy for lupus nephritis (LN), including the role of cyclosporine (CsA), still lacks scientifically valid clinical experience. We evaluated the efficacy of CsA in the induction and maintenance treatment of patients with biopsy-proven LN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 31 patients (25 women, 6 men, mean age 29.5 years) were enrolled in the study. The majority had proliferative LN. The mean follow-up was 85.6 +/- 24.7 months. RESULTS: CsA was used as first-line treatment in 38.7% of patients and as second-line treatment in 61.3% of patients. Complete remission was achieved in 93.5% of patients. The relapse rate was 45.2%. The mean disease-free interval was 33 months. At the end of follow-up, a total of 67.9% of the patients were in remission. The treatment led to significant improvement in proteinuria (p = 0.001) and stabilization of renal function. CONCLUSION: CsA might be an appropriate and a less toxic alternative drug for LN both as a first-choice and rescue therapy.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a cyklosporin $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D016572
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunosupresiva $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D007166
- 650 _2
- $a longitudinální studie $7 D008137
- 650 _2
- $a nefritida při lupus erythematodes $x farmakoterapie $7 D008181
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
- 700 1_
- $a Vaňková, Zdenka $7 xx0126211
- 700 1_
- $a Maixnerová, Dita $7 xx0063141
- 700 1_
- $a Dostál, Ctibor, $d 1927- $7 jn20000400512
- 700 1_
- $a Jančová, Eva $7 xx0053098
- 700 1_
- $a Honsová, Eva, $d 1956- $7 xx0075648
- 700 1_
- $a Merta, Miroslav, $7 mzk2004248662 $d 1954-
- 700 1_
- $a Ryšavá, Romana, $d 1967- $7 xx0084071
- 700 1_
- $a Tesař, Vladimír, $d 1957- $7 jn20000402349
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003064 $t Kidney & blood pressure research $g Roč. 30, č. 2 (2007), s. 124-128 $x 1420-4096
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 7 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20090726182400 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20131014145433 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 670875 $s 530024
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2007 $b 30 $c 2 $d 124-128 $i 1420-4096 $m Kidney & blood pressure research $x MED00003064
- GRA __
- $a NR8444 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a 2009-B3/vtme