• Something wrong with this record ?

Benefits of complementary therapy with insulin aspart versus human regular insulin in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Chlup R, Zapletalová J, Seckar P, Malá E, Doubravová B, Táncosová S, Chlupová L, Pukowietz L, Zatloukal P.

Language English Country United States

Document type Controlled Clinical Trial

Grant support
NR7825 MZ0 CEP Register

BACKGROUND: Absorption rates of the phosphate-buffered insulin analogs aspart, lispro, and glulisine prevail over that of regular human insulin. The aim of this prospective observational open-label controlled study was to compare the effects of aspart and human regular insulin resulting from their sequential long-lasting routine administration in small preprandial boluses to individuals with type 2 diabetes according to identical algorithms. METHODS: Fifty-seven individuals with type 2 diabetes 64.0 +/- 1.29 (mean +/- SE) years old with diabetes' duration of 12.4 +/- 1.06 years, treated with human regular insulin for 5.2 +/- 0.44 years, and a serum C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.10 nmol/L were enrolled into the study. Following two checkups performed in the course of the 364 +/- 17.9-day baseline period, human regular insulin was replaced with aspart in equivalent boluses, and two checkups in the course of 330 +/- 11.1-day sequential period were performed. The control group consisted of 17 individuals with type 2 diabetes 68.4 +/- 2.36 years old with diabetes' duration of 9.9 +/- 1.57 years, treated with insulin for 4.2 +/- 0.57 years, and a C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.11 nmol/L. Data were analyzed using the statistical program SPSS version 10.1. (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: Following the switch from human regular insulin to aspart, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from 8.4 +/- 0.23% at baseline to 7.9 +/- 0.17% (P = 0.031), and thereafter to 7.5 +/- 0.20% (P < 0.001), while plasma glucose concentrations in 10-point profiles, daily insulin dose (37.1 +/- 1.39 IU/day), body mass index (BMI) (30.5 +/- 0.82 kg/m(2)), and frequency of hypo- and hyperglycemic episodes did not change (P > 0.05). Patients quote satisfaction was good. No adverse events were recorded. In the control group, no significant change of baseline HbA1c (8.4 +/- 0.54%), insulin dose (33.1 +/- 3.17 IU/day), and BMI (32.1 +/- 1.12 kg/m(2)) was found. CONCLUSION: Aspart appears to be more effective than human regular insulin for complementary insulin treatment in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc10003270
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240904103555.0
008      
100209s2007 xxu e eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Chlup, Rudolf, $d 1947- $7 jn20001031001
245    10
$a Benefits of complementary therapy with insulin aspart versus human regular insulin in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus / $c Chlup R, Zapletalová J, Seckar P, Malá E, Doubravová B, Táncosová S, Chlupová L, Pukowietz L, Zatloukal P.
314    __
$a Institute of Physiology, Department of Medicine, Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic. rudolf.chlup@fnol.cz
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Absorption rates of the phosphate-buffered insulin analogs aspart, lispro, and glulisine prevail over that of regular human insulin. The aim of this prospective observational open-label controlled study was to compare the effects of aspart and human regular insulin resulting from their sequential long-lasting routine administration in small preprandial boluses to individuals with type 2 diabetes according to identical algorithms. METHODS: Fifty-seven individuals with type 2 diabetes 64.0 +/- 1.29 (mean +/- SE) years old with diabetes' duration of 12.4 +/- 1.06 years, treated with human regular insulin for 5.2 +/- 0.44 years, and a serum C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.10 nmol/L were enrolled into the study. Following two checkups performed in the course of the 364 +/- 17.9-day baseline period, human regular insulin was replaced with aspart in equivalent boluses, and two checkups in the course of 330 +/- 11.1-day sequential period were performed. The control group consisted of 17 individuals with type 2 diabetes 68.4 +/- 2.36 years old with diabetes' duration of 9.9 +/- 1.57 years, treated with insulin for 4.2 +/- 0.57 years, and a C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.11 nmol/L. Data were analyzed using the statistical program SPSS version 10.1. (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: Following the switch from human regular insulin to aspart, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from 8.4 +/- 0.23% at baseline to 7.9 +/- 0.17% (P = 0.031), and thereafter to 7.5 +/- 0.20% (P < 0.001), while plasma glucose concentrations in 10-point profiles, daily insulin dose (37.1 +/- 1.39 IU/day), body mass index (BMI) (30.5 +/- 0.82 kg/m(2)), and frequency of hypo- and hyperglycemic episodes did not change (P > 0.05). Patients quote satisfaction was good. No adverse events were recorded. In the control group, no significant change of baseline HbA1c (8.4 +/- 0.54%), insulin dose (33.1 +/- 3.17 IU/day), and BMI (32.1 +/- 1.12 kg/m(2)) was found. CONCLUSION: Aspart appears to be more effective than human regular insulin for complementary insulin treatment in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a krevní glukóza $x metabolismus $7 D001786
650    _2
$a index tělesné hmotnosti $7 D015992
650    _2
$a C-peptid $x krev $7 D002096
650    _2
$a diabetes mellitus 2. typu $x farmakoterapie $x krev $7 D003924
650    _2
$a glykovaný hemoglobin $x metabolismus $7 D006442
650    _2
$a hypoglykemika $x terapeutické užití $7 D007004
650    _2
$a inzulin $x analogy a deriváty $x terapeutické užití $7 D007328
650    _2
$a lipidy $x krev $7 D008055
650    _2
$a spokojenost pacientů $7 D017060
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _7
$a klinické zkoušky kontrolované $2 czmesh $7 D018848
700    1_
$a Zapletalová, Jana $7 xx0111614
700    1_
$a Sečkař, Pavel $7 xx0129512
700    1_
$a Malá, Eva $7 _AN046999
700    1_
$a Doubravová, Blanka $7 xx0320541
700    1_
$a Táncosová, Svatava $7 _AN045690
700    1_
$a Chlupová, Ludmila $7 _AN035019
700    1_
$a Pukowietz, Libor $7 _AN047000
700    1_
$a Zatloukal, Petr $7 _AN047002
773    0_
$w MED00173679 $t Diabetes technology & therapeutics $g Roč. 9, č. 3 (2007), s. 223-231 $x 1520-9156
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 8 $z 0
990    __
$a 20100114162108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240904103551 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 709199 $s 572012
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2007 $b 9 $c 3 $d 223-231 $m Diabetes technology & therapeutics $x MED00173679
GRA    __
$a NR7825 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a 2010-b1/dkme

Find record