-
Something wrong with this record ?
Benefits of complementary therapy with insulin aspart versus human regular insulin in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Chlup R, Zapletalová J, Seckar P, Malá E, Doubravová B, Táncosová S, Chlupová L, Pukowietz L, Zatloukal P.
Language English Country United States
Document type Controlled Clinical Trial
Grant support
NR7825
MZ0
CEP Register
Digital library NLK
Full text - Část
Source
- MeSH
- C-Peptide blood MeSH
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 drug therapy blood MeSH
- Financing, Organized MeSH
- Glycated Hemoglobin metabolism MeSH
- Hypoglycemic Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Body Mass Index MeSH
- Insulin analogs & derivatives therapeutic use MeSH
- Blood Glucose metabolism MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lipids blood MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Patient Satisfaction MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Controlled Clinical Trial MeSH
BACKGROUND: Absorption rates of the phosphate-buffered insulin analogs aspart, lispro, and glulisine prevail over that of regular human insulin. The aim of this prospective observational open-label controlled study was to compare the effects of aspart and human regular insulin resulting from their sequential long-lasting routine administration in small preprandial boluses to individuals with type 2 diabetes according to identical algorithms. METHODS: Fifty-seven individuals with type 2 diabetes 64.0 +/- 1.29 (mean +/- SE) years old with diabetes' duration of 12.4 +/- 1.06 years, treated with human regular insulin for 5.2 +/- 0.44 years, and a serum C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.10 nmol/L were enrolled into the study. Following two checkups performed in the course of the 364 +/- 17.9-day baseline period, human regular insulin was replaced with aspart in equivalent boluses, and two checkups in the course of 330 +/- 11.1-day sequential period were performed. The control group consisted of 17 individuals with type 2 diabetes 68.4 +/- 2.36 years old with diabetes' duration of 9.9 +/- 1.57 years, treated with insulin for 4.2 +/- 0.57 years, and a C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.11 nmol/L. Data were analyzed using the statistical program SPSS version 10.1. (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: Following the switch from human regular insulin to aspart, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from 8.4 +/- 0.23% at baseline to 7.9 +/- 0.17% (P = 0.031), and thereafter to 7.5 +/- 0.20% (P < 0.001), while plasma glucose concentrations in 10-point profiles, daily insulin dose (37.1 +/- 1.39 IU/day), body mass index (BMI) (30.5 +/- 0.82 kg/m(2)), and frequency of hypo- and hyperglycemic episodes did not change (P > 0.05). Patients quote satisfaction was good. No adverse events were recorded. In the control group, no significant change of baseline HbA1c (8.4 +/- 0.54%), insulin dose (33.1 +/- 3.17 IU/day), and BMI (32.1 +/- 1.12 kg/m(2)) was found. CONCLUSION: Aspart appears to be more effective than human regular insulin for complementary insulin treatment in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc10003270
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240904103555.0
- 008
- 100209s2007 xxu e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Chlup, Rudolf, $d 1947- $7 jn20001031001
- 245 10
- $a Benefits of complementary therapy with insulin aspart versus human regular insulin in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus / $c Chlup R, Zapletalová J, Seckar P, Malá E, Doubravová B, Táncosová S, Chlupová L, Pukowietz L, Zatloukal P.
- 314 __
- $a Institute of Physiology, Department of Medicine, Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic. rudolf.chlup@fnol.cz
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Absorption rates of the phosphate-buffered insulin analogs aspart, lispro, and glulisine prevail over that of regular human insulin. The aim of this prospective observational open-label controlled study was to compare the effects of aspart and human regular insulin resulting from their sequential long-lasting routine administration in small preprandial boluses to individuals with type 2 diabetes according to identical algorithms. METHODS: Fifty-seven individuals with type 2 diabetes 64.0 +/- 1.29 (mean +/- SE) years old with diabetes' duration of 12.4 +/- 1.06 years, treated with human regular insulin for 5.2 +/- 0.44 years, and a serum C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.10 nmol/L were enrolled into the study. Following two checkups performed in the course of the 364 +/- 17.9-day baseline period, human regular insulin was replaced with aspart in equivalent boluses, and two checkups in the course of 330 +/- 11.1-day sequential period were performed. The control group consisted of 17 individuals with type 2 diabetes 68.4 +/- 2.36 years old with diabetes' duration of 9.9 +/- 1.57 years, treated with insulin for 4.2 +/- 0.57 years, and a C-peptide level of 1.1 +/- 0.11 nmol/L. Data were analyzed using the statistical program SPSS version 10.1. (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: Following the switch from human regular insulin to aspart, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from 8.4 +/- 0.23% at baseline to 7.9 +/- 0.17% (P = 0.031), and thereafter to 7.5 +/- 0.20% (P < 0.001), while plasma glucose concentrations in 10-point profiles, daily insulin dose (37.1 +/- 1.39 IU/day), body mass index (BMI) (30.5 +/- 0.82 kg/m(2)), and frequency of hypo- and hyperglycemic episodes did not change (P > 0.05). Patients quote satisfaction was good. No adverse events were recorded. In the control group, no significant change of baseline HbA1c (8.4 +/- 0.54%), insulin dose (33.1 +/- 3.17 IU/day), and BMI (32.1 +/- 1.12 kg/m(2)) was found. CONCLUSION: Aspart appears to be more effective than human regular insulin for complementary insulin treatment in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
- 650 _2
- $a financování organizované $7 D005381
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a krevní glukóza $x metabolismus $7 D001786
- 650 _2
- $a index tělesné hmotnosti $7 D015992
- 650 _2
- $a C-peptid $x krev $7 D002096
- 650 _2
- $a diabetes mellitus 2. typu $x farmakoterapie $x krev $7 D003924
- 650 _2
- $a glykovaný hemoglobin $x metabolismus $7 D006442
- 650 _2
- $a hypoglykemika $x terapeutické užití $7 D007004
- 650 _2
- $a inzulin $x analogy a deriváty $x terapeutické užití $7 D007328
- 650 _2
- $a lipidy $x krev $7 D008055
- 650 _2
- $a spokojenost pacientů $7 D017060
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _7
- $a klinické zkoušky kontrolované $2 czmesh $7 D018848
- 700 1_
- $a Zapletalová, Jana $7 xx0111614
- 700 1_
- $a Sečkař, Pavel $7 xx0129512
- 700 1_
- $a Malá, Eva $7 _AN046999
- 700 1_
- $a Doubravová, Blanka $7 xx0320541
- 700 1_
- $a Táncosová, Svatava $7 _AN045690
- 700 1_
- $a Chlupová, Ludmila $7 _AN035019
- 700 1_
- $a Pukowietz, Libor $7 _AN047000
- 700 1_
- $a Zatloukal, Petr $7 _AN047002
- 773 0_
- $w MED00173679 $t Diabetes technology & therapeutics $g Roč. 9, č. 3 (2007), s. 223-231 $x 1520-9156
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 8 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20100114162108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240904103551 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 709199 $s 572012
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2007 $b 9 $c 3 $d 223-231 $m Diabetes technology & therapeutics $x MED00173679
- GRA __
- $a NR7825 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a 2010-b1/dkme