• Something wrong with this record ?

fMRI evaluation of hemispheric language dominance using various methods of laterality index calculation

P Chlebus, M Mikl, M Brazdil, M Pazourkova, P Krupa, I Rektor

. 2007 ; 179 (3) : 365-374.

Language English Country Germany

E-resources Online

NLK ProQuest Central from 2001-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2001-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2001-01-01 to 1 year ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest) from 2001-01-01 to 1 year ago

Several functional MR imaging studies evaluating the lateralisation of linguistic functions in patients who underwent Wada testing have been reported. There is extensive variance in the Laterality index (LI) calculation across the studies, and the optimal calculation method remains unclear. We attempted to calculate the LI in different ways in the same subjects, in order to find the LI calculation method with the highest correlation to the Wada test. Fifteen patients (10 females, 5 males) suffering from medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) (12 left, 3 right) were admitted for the study. The patients underwent a standardized bilateral intracarotid short-acting barbiturate test. Language testing included spontaneous speech, oral comprehension, reading, object and picture naming, and repetition. All the tasks were scored separately in order to increase the possibility of correlation between Wada and LI. A silent phonemic verbal fluency task (VFT) was used as a language paradigm for functional measurement. Regions of interest (ROIs), with a known association with language function (Broca's area, the lateral prefrontal cortex, etc.), were defined. First, the LIs were calculated from the ROIs using a previously reported method (simple suprathreshold count). Next, we used several new methods of LI calculation (t-weighting of voxels, methods independent of the choice of the statistical threshold, etc.) The most significant correlation with Wada was proven in the LIs that were evaluated from Broca's area (up to R = 0.94, P = 1 x 10(-7)). However, the new LI calculation methods used in the present study did not produce a statistically significant benefit in comparison to previously reported methods.

000      
03899naa 2200565 a 4500
001      
bmc10010935
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121031095228.0
008      
100507s2007 gw e eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Chlebus, Pavel $7 stk2008428787
245    10
$a fMRI evaluation of hemispheric language dominance using various methods of laterality index calculation / $c P Chlebus, M Mikl, M Brazdil, M Pazourkova, P Krupa, I Rektor
314    __
$a Department of Neurology, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Pekarska 53, Brno, 65691, Czech Republic. chlepa@centrum.cz
520    9_
$a Several functional MR imaging studies evaluating the lateralisation of linguistic functions in patients who underwent Wada testing have been reported. There is extensive variance in the Laterality index (LI) calculation across the studies, and the optimal calculation method remains unclear. We attempted to calculate the LI in different ways in the same subjects, in order to find the LI calculation method with the highest correlation to the Wada test. Fifteen patients (10 females, 5 males) suffering from medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) (12 left, 3 right) were admitted for the study. The patients underwent a standardized bilateral intracarotid short-acting barbiturate test. Language testing included spontaneous speech, oral comprehension, reading, object and picture naming, and repetition. All the tasks were scored separately in order to increase the possibility of correlation between Wada and LI. A silent phonemic verbal fluency task (VFT) was used as a language paradigm for functional measurement. Regions of interest (ROIs), with a known association with language function (Broca's area, the lateral prefrontal cortex, etc.), were defined. First, the LIs were calculated from the ROIs using a previously reported method (simple suprathreshold count). Next, we used several new methods of LI calculation (t-weighting of voxels, methods independent of the choice of the statistical threshold, etc.) The most significant correlation with Wada was proven in the LIs that were evaluated from Broca's area (up to R = 0.94, P = 1 x 10(-7)). However, the new LI calculation methods used in the present study did not produce a statistically significant benefit in comparison to previously reported methods.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a amobarbital $x diagnostické užití $7 D000654
650    _2
$a mapování mozku $x metody $7 D001931
650    _2
$a mozková kůra $x anatomie a histologie $x fyziologie $7 D002540
650    _2
$a epilepsie temporálního laloku $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D004833
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a čelní lalok $x anatomie a histologie $x fyziologie $7 D005625
650    _2
$a funkční lateralita $x fyziologie $7 D007839
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hypnotika a sedativa $x diagnostické užití $7 D006993
650    _2
$a jazyk (prostředek komunikace) $7 D007802
650    _2
$a jazykové testy $7 D007807
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a nervová síť $x anatomie a histologie $x fyziologie $7 D009415
650    _2
$a neuropsychologické testy $7 D009483
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a čtení $7 D011932
650    _2
$a řeč $x fyziologie $7 D013060
650    _2
$a percepce řeči $x fyziologie $7 D013067
650    _2
$a verbální chování $x fyziologie $7 D014705
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
700    1_
$a Mikl, Michal, $d 1978- $7 xx0115854
700    1_
$a Brázdil, Milan, $d 1965- $7 mzk2004258674
700    1_
$a Pažourková, Marta $7 xx0092898
700    1_
$a Krupa, Petr, $d 1954- $7 xx0081878
700    1_
$a Rektor, Ivan, $d 1948- $7 nlk19990073773
773    0_
$t Experimental Brain Research $w MED00009710 $g Roč. 179, č. 3 (2007), s. 365-374 $x 0014-4819
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 8
990    __
$a 20100525151810 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121031095231 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 724792 $s 587939
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2007 $b 179 $c 3 $d 365-374 $i 0014-4819 $m Experimental Brain Research $n Exp Brain Res $x MED00009710
LZP    __
$a 2010-B2/dkme

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...