-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer
D Fischerova, D Cibula, H Stenhova, H Vondrichova, P Calda, M Zikan, P Freitag, J Slama, P Dundr, J Belacek
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie
- MeSH
- časná diagnóza MeSH
- endosonografie MeSH
- karcinom patologie radiografie ultrasonografie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie metody MeSH
- nádory děložního čípku patologie radiografie ultrasonografie MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- rektum ultrasonografie MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- tumor burden MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- hodnotící studie MeSH
The goal of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of tumor volume, early parametrial infiltration, and identification of residual tumor in early-stage cervical cancer. Patients in whom an early-stage cervical cancer was diagnosed by clinical examination were enrolled in the study. Only those patients who were examined by both MRI and TRUS with following surgical treatment were included. Imaging results were compared with pathology findings. Altogether, 120 patients were consecutively enrolled from January 2004 to February 2006. Data from 95 patients were evaluated. Correlation coefficient for TRUS- and MRI-derived volumes versus volumes at pathology reached R = 0.996 and R = 0.980, respectively. The accuracy for detecting tumor in 95 patients was 93.7% for TRUS and 83.2% for MRI (P
- 000
- 03549naa 2200517 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11005126
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121112114215.0
- 008
- 110311s2008 xxu e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Fischerová, Daniela $7 xx0074804
- 245 10
- $a Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer / $c D Fischerova, D Cibula, H Stenhova, H Vondrichova, P Calda, M Zikan, P Freitag, J Slama, P Dundr, J Belacek
- 314 __
- $a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncogynecological Center, General Teaching Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. daniela.fischerova@seznam.cz
- 520 9_
- $a The goal of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of tumor volume, early parametrial infiltration, and identification of residual tumor in early-stage cervical cancer. Patients in whom an early-stage cervical cancer was diagnosed by clinical examination were enrolled in the study. Only those patients who were examined by both MRI and TRUS with following surgical treatment were included. Imaging results were compared with pathology findings. Altogether, 120 patients were consecutively enrolled from January 2004 to February 2006. Data from 95 patients were evaluated. Correlation coefficient for TRUS- and MRI-derived volumes versus volumes at pathology reached R = 0.996 and R = 0.980, respectively. The accuracy for detecting tumor in 95 patients was 93.7% for TRUS and 83.2% for MRI (P <or= 0.006). In small tumors (<or=1 cm(3)), the accuracy of tumor detection by TRUS was 90.5% and 81.1% by MRI (P <or= 0.049). The accuracy of parametrial infiltration detection by TRUS and MRI was 98.9% and 94.7%, respectively (P <or= 0.219). The accuracy was not influenced by body mass index values. In conclusion, our results showed the accuracy of TRUS as being comparable to the more commonly used MRI in staging of early-stage cervical cancer. TRUS and the pathology-derived volumes correlated tightly; accuracy of TRUS was superior to MRI, especially in detection of residual tumors following conization.
- 650 _2
- $a karcinom $x patologie $x radiografie $x ultrasonografie $7 D002277
- 650 _2
- $a časná diagnóza $7 D042241
- 650 _2
- $a endosonografie $7 D019160
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $7 D009367
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a rektum $x ultrasonografie $7 D012007
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a tumor burden $7 D047368
- 650 _2
- $a nádory děložního čípku $x patologie $x radiografie $x ultrasonografie $7 D002583
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 700 1_
- $a Cibula, David, $d 1968- $7 jo20000074072
- 700 1_
- $a Štěňhová, Helena $7 xx0094674
- 700 1_
- $a Vondřichová, Hana $7 xx0101292
- 700 1_
- $a Calda, Pavel, $d 1957- $7 mzk2006323882
- 700 1_
- $a Zikán, Michal, $d 1976- $7 xx0096708
- 700 1_
- $a Freitag, Pavel, $d 1951- $7 xx0018148
- 700 1_
- $a Sláma, Jiří $7 xx0105772
- 700 1_
- $a Dundr, Pavel $7 xx0080436
- 700 1_
- $a Běláček, Jaromír $7 xx0092431
- 773 0_
- $t International Journal of Gynecological Cancer $w MED00009896 $g Roč. 18, č. 4 (2008), s. 766-772
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 1
- 990 __
- $a 20110414094733 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121112114229 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 832967 $s 697176
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2008 $b 18 $c 4 $d 766-772 $m International journal of gynecological cancer $n Int J Gynecol Cancer $x MED00009896
- LZP __
- $a 2011-4B/vtme
