Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Srovnávací analýza šroubů Socon CS a Socon v ošetření osteoporotických zlomenin torakolumbální páteře - biomechanická studie
[Comparative analysis of Socon CS and Socon Pedicle Screws in view of their use for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbal spine. A biomechanical study]

I. Janů, J. Kočiš, T. Návrat, Z. Florian, P. Wendsche

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc11035239

Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj

E-zdroje Online

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2006

To compare the anchorage strength of Socon CS cannulated pedicle screws (B. Braun, Aesculap) with that of Socon screws in human cadaver vertebrae, using pull-out strength testing. MATERIAL Twelve samples involving T12 to L3 vertebrae were prepared and a total of 20 pedicle screws, 10 Socon CS and 10 Socon screws, were inserted in them. All screws were 55 mm in length and 6 mm in diameter. After placement, Socon CS pedicle screws were augmented with bone cement (Cimplant cement application kit, B. Braun, Aesculap). METHODS Both Socon CS and Socon screws were subjected to monotonous loading in the testing device ZWICK Z 020-TND with tensile stress applied in the screw axis. We evaluated the magnitude of strength resulting in screw loosening and the relationship between this strength and bone density of the sample. RESULTS Bone density of measured samples corresponded either to osteopenia, i.e. T-score range of -1 to -2.5 SD (standard deviation) or osteoporosis, i.e. T-score -2.5 SD. The average bone density of all samples corresponded to a T-score of -3.1 SD. Bone-screw linkage was found to be associated with both bone-cement and screw-cement interface. Pull-out strength was significantly higher for the Socon CS than the Socon screws (t-test, p<0.0005). In the Socon screws, the linear correlation between pull-out strength and bone density was significant at a 5% level of statistical significance (p=0.008) while, in the Socon CS screws, it was not significant (p=0.065). DISCUSSION The poor quality of osteoporotic bone is responsible for a higher frequency of implant failure due to loosening, particularly when implants developed for healthy bone are used. In this biomechanical study, we tested one of the possibilities of how to reduce the risk of implant failure by pedicle screw augmentation with bone cement. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study confirm the hypothesis that the anchorage of Socon CS cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation is disrupted by significantly higher pull-out strength than that of Socon screws, when subjected to monotonous loading. However, more clinical studies are needed to evaluate clinical outcomes

Comparative analysis of Socon CS and Socon Pedicle Screws in view of their use for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbal spine. A biomechanical study

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Lit.: 26

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc11035239
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20120319125622.0
008      
110927s2011 xr e cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.55095/achot2011/051 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21888844
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Janů, Iva $7 xx0099757
245    10
$a Srovnávací analýza šroubů Socon CS a Socon v ošetření osteoporotických zlomenin torakolumbální páteře - biomechanická studie / $c I. Janů, J. Kočiš, T. Návrat, Z. Florian, P. Wendsche
246    11
$a Comparative analysis of Socon CS and Socon Pedicle Screws in view of their use for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbal spine. A biomechanical study
314    __
$a Klinika traumatologie LF MU v Úrazové nemocnici v Brně
504    __
$a Lit.: 26
520    9_
$a To compare the anchorage strength of Socon CS cannulated pedicle screws (B. Braun, Aesculap) with that of Socon screws in human cadaver vertebrae, using pull-out strength testing. MATERIAL Twelve samples involving T12 to L3 vertebrae were prepared and a total of 20 pedicle screws, 10 Socon CS and 10 Socon screws, were inserted in them. All screws were 55 mm in length and 6 mm in diameter. After placement, Socon CS pedicle screws were augmented with bone cement (Cimplant cement application kit, B. Braun, Aesculap). METHODS Both Socon CS and Socon screws were subjected to monotonous loading in the testing device ZWICK Z 020-TND with tensile stress applied in the screw axis. We evaluated the magnitude of strength resulting in screw loosening and the relationship between this strength and bone density of the sample. RESULTS Bone density of measured samples corresponded either to osteopenia, i.e. T-score range of -1 to -2.5 SD (standard deviation) or osteoporosis, i.e. T-score -2.5 SD. The average bone density of all samples corresponded to a T-score of -3.1 SD. Bone-screw linkage was found to be associated with both bone-cement and screw-cement interface. Pull-out strength was significantly higher for the Socon CS than the Socon screws (t-test, p<0.0005). In the Socon screws, the linear correlation between pull-out strength and bone density was significant at a 5% level of statistical significance (p=0.008) while, in the Socon CS screws, it was not significant (p=0.065). DISCUSSION The poor quality of osteoporotic bone is responsible for a higher frequency of implant failure due to loosening, particularly when implants developed for healthy bone are used. In this biomechanical study, we tested one of the possibilities of how to reduce the risk of implant failure by pedicle screw augmentation with bone cement. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study confirm the hypothesis that the anchorage of Socon CS cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation is disrupted by significantly higher pull-out strength than that of Socon screws, when subjected to monotonous loading. However, more clinical studies are needed to evaluate clinical outcomes
650    02
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    02
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    02
$a biomechanika $7 D001696
650    02
$a kostní denzita $7 D015519
650    02
$a kostní šrouby $7 D001863
650    02
$a mrtvola $7 D002102
650    02
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    02
$a bederní obratle $x chirurgie $x patofyziologie $x zranění $7 D008159
650    02
$a osteoporotické fraktury $x chirurgie $x patofyziologie $7 D058866
650    02
$a fraktury páteře $x chirurgie $x patofyziologie $7 D016103
650    02
$a hrudní obratle $x chirurgie $x patofyziologie $x zranění $7 D013904
650    _2
$a techniky in vitro $7 D066298
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Kočiš, Ján $7 xx0081819
700    1_
$a Návrat, Tomáš. $7 mzk2005279266
700    1_
$a Florian, Zdeněk, $d 1951- $7 jn19981001193
700    1_
$a Wendsche, Peter, $d 1945- $7 mzk2002103163
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae čechoslovaca $g Roč. 78, č. 4 (2011), s. 334-338 $x 0001-5415
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 2
990    __
$a 20110927082703 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20120319125607 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 880564 $s 745363
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 78 $c 4 $d 334-338 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$a 2011-18/mkme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé