• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Jak důležitý je věk při definici prognózy pacientů s komunitní pneumonií?
[How important is age in defining the prognosis of patients with community-acquired pneumonia?]

Wendy I. Sligl, Sumit R. Majumdar

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc11039617

Given that the population is increasing in age, a better understanding of the relationship between chronological age and health-related outcomes (especially mortality) is needed, for both chronic diseases (e.g. diabetes) and acute illnesses (e.g. pneumonia). Our purpose was to review the impact of age on the prognosis of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). RECENT FINDINGS: Many studies in patients with CAP have suggested that chronological age is not necessarily independently associated with mortality. Poorer outcomes in the elderly with CAP have been related to severity of disease, comorbid disease burden, functional status, and frailty, but not to age alone. However, many of these studies suffer from 'over-adjustment' due to the use of unmodified severity scores such as the Pneumonia Severity Index or Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (that already include age) in multivariable analyses. Studies accounting for this over-adjustment suggest that age is, in fact, independently associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with CAP. Other outcomes including hospitalization and readmission rates, hospital length of stay, and cost of care are similarly associated with increasing age. Residual confounding is still a problem in many of the observational studies reviewed. SUMMARY: Contrary to conventional wisdom, chronological age is independently associated with adverse outcomes in patients with CAP. Until better methods (or more clinically-rich datasets) for observational studies are developed that can avoid over-adjustment and better deal with residual confounding, physicians should take into account both a patient's overall health status and his or her chronological age.

How important is age in defining the prognosis of patients with community-acquired pneumonia?

Bibliografie atd.

Lit.: 62

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc11039617
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210223407.0
008      
111109s2011 xr e cze||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Sligl, Wendy I.
245    10
$a Jak důležitý je věk při definici prognózy pacientů s komunitní pneumonií? / $c Wendy I. Sligl, Sumit R. Majumdar
246    11
$a How important is age in defining the prognosis of patients with community-acquired pneumonia?
314    __
$a Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada wsligl@ualberta.ca
504    __
$a Lit.: 62
520    9_
$a Given that the population is increasing in age, a better understanding of the relationship between chronological age and health-related outcomes (especially mortality) is needed, for both chronic diseases (e.g. diabetes) and acute illnesses (e.g. pneumonia). Our purpose was to review the impact of age on the prognosis of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). RECENT FINDINGS: Many studies in patients with CAP have suggested that chronological age is not necessarily independently associated with mortality. Poorer outcomes in the elderly with CAP have been related to severity of disease, comorbid disease burden, functional status, and frailty, but not to age alone. However, many of these studies suffer from 'over-adjustment' due to the use of unmodified severity scores such as the Pneumonia Severity Index or Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (that already include age) in multivariable analyses. Studies accounting for this over-adjustment suggest that age is, in fact, independently associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with CAP. Other outcomes including hospitalization and readmission rates, hospital length of stay, and cost of care are similarly associated with increasing age. Residual confounding is still a problem in many of the observational studies reviewed. SUMMARY: Contrary to conventional wisdom, chronological age is independently associated with adverse outcomes in patients with CAP. Until better methods (or more clinically-rich datasets) for observational studies are developed that can avoid over-adjustment and better deal with residual confounding, physicians should take into account both a patient's overall health status and his or her chronological age.
650    _2
$a věkové faktory $7 D000367
650    _2
$a stárnutí $x imunologie $7 D000375
650    _2
$a infekce získané v komunitě $x imunologie $x mortalita $7 D017714
650    _2
$a hospitalizace $7 D006760
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a bakteriální pneumonie $x imunologie $x mortalita $7 D018410
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Majumdar, Sumit R.
773    0_
$w MED00173855 $t Current opinion in infectious diseases $g Roč. 1, č. 2 (2011), s. 43-48 $x 1804-7084
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2646 $c 512 $y 7
990    __
$a 20111109114243 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20111109124920 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 885791 $s 749971
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 1 $c 2 $d 43-48 $m Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases (České vyd.) $x MED00173855
LZP    __
$a 2011-22/mkme

Najít záznam