-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Possibilities of enhancing the colour of egg yolk
P. Dvořák, P. Suchý, E. Straková, V. Kopřiva,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
22002540
DOI
10.1002/jsfa.4657
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biologické pigmenty aplikace a dávkování metabolismus MeSH
- chov zvířat MeSH
- inbrední kmeny zvířat MeSH
- krmivo pro zvířata analýza MeSH
- kur domácí MeSH
- květy chemie MeSH
- lipnicovité metabolismus MeSH
- Tagetes chemie MeSH
- vaječný žloutek metabolismus MeSH
- xanthofyly aplikace a dávkování metabolismus MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
BACKGROUND: This study attempts to compare two possibilities of enhancing the colour of egg yolk. One of them is based on the ecological rearing of laying hens on natural green grass whereas the other uses a feeding dose supplemented with natural pigments in laying hens reared in individual cages. Is it possible to distinguish these two technologies using yolk colour determination in the CIELAB system? RESULTS: Yolk colour parameters such as L*, a*, and b* in the group of grazed hens are significantly different (α = 0.001) from those observed in hens reared in cages. The yolk colour shows a darker, redder and more yellow colour. The greatest difference was seen in the red colour parameter, a*, that increased more than twice. Visually, this means a shift towards a more orange colour. Compared to grazing in the meadow (ΔE* = 13.257), the addition of artificial pigments in the feed resulted in a more significant increase in the parameter ΔE* (CIE total colour difference), with the greatest value of ΔE* being observed with the use of both pigments (ΔE* = 24.265). CONCLUSION: Grazing increases the parameter a* whereas the values of the parameter C*(ab) remain relatively low. The parameter ΔE* is significantly lower in the case of grazing as compared to the supplementation of the feed with pigments. However, colourity parameters cannot be used as a specific standard to identify a particular grazing technology as their values vary during the laying period.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12024329
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121207121920.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120815s2012 enk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/jsfa.4657 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22002540
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Dvořák, Petr $u Department of Biochemistry, Chemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. dvorakp@vfu.cz
- 245 10
- $a Possibilities of enhancing the colour of egg yolk / $c P. Dvořák, P. Suchý, E. Straková, V. Kopřiva,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: This study attempts to compare two possibilities of enhancing the colour of egg yolk. One of them is based on the ecological rearing of laying hens on natural green grass whereas the other uses a feeding dose supplemented with natural pigments in laying hens reared in individual cages. Is it possible to distinguish these two technologies using yolk colour determination in the CIELAB system? RESULTS: Yolk colour parameters such as L*, a*, and b* in the group of grazed hens are significantly different (α = 0.001) from those observed in hens reared in cages. The yolk colour shows a darker, redder and more yellow colour. The greatest difference was seen in the red colour parameter, a*, that increased more than twice. Visually, this means a shift towards a more orange colour. Compared to grazing in the meadow (ΔE* = 13.257), the addition of artificial pigments in the feed resulted in a more significant increase in the parameter ΔE* (CIE total colour difference), with the greatest value of ΔE* being observed with the use of both pigments (ΔE* = 24.265). CONCLUSION: Grazing increases the parameter a* whereas the values of the parameter C*(ab) remain relatively low. The parameter ΔE* is significantly lower in the case of grazing as compared to the supplementation of the feed with pigments. However, colourity parameters cannot be used as a specific standard to identify a particular grazing technology as their values vary during the laying period.
- 650 _2
- $a krmivo pro zvířata $x analýza $7 D000821
- 650 _2
- $a chov zvířat $7 D000822
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a inbrední kmeny zvířat $7 D017849
- 650 _2
- $a kur domácí $7 D002645
- 650 _2
- $a vaječný žloutek $x metabolismus $7 D004530
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a květy $x chemie $7 D035264
- 650 _2
- $a biologické pigmenty $x aplikace a dávkování $x metabolismus $7 D010860
- 650 _2
- $a lipnicovité $x metabolismus $7 D006109
- 650 _2
- $a Tagetes $x chemie $7 D031686
- 650 _2
- $a xanthofyly $x aplikace a dávkování $x metabolismus $7 D024341
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Suchý, Pavel
- 700 1_
- $a Straková, Eva
- 700 1_
- $a Kopřiva, Vladimír
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003015 $t Journal of the science of food and agriculture $x 1097-0010 $g Roč. 92, č. 4 (2012), s. 853-6
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22002540 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120815 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121207121954 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 946477 $s 781657
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 92 $c 4 $d 853-6 $i 1097-0010 $m Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture $n J Sci Food Agric $x MED00003015
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120815/12/02