• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Possibilities of enhancing the colour of egg yolk

P. Dvořák, P. Suchý, E. Straková, V. Kopřiva,

. 2012 ; 92 (4) : 853-6.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12024329

BACKGROUND: This study attempts to compare two possibilities of enhancing the colour of egg yolk. One of them is based on the ecological rearing of laying hens on natural green grass whereas the other uses a feeding dose supplemented with natural pigments in laying hens reared in individual cages. Is it possible to distinguish these two technologies using yolk colour determination in the CIELAB system? RESULTS: Yolk colour parameters such as L*, a*, and b* in the group of grazed hens are significantly different (α = 0.001) from those observed in hens reared in cages. The yolk colour shows a darker, redder and more yellow colour. The greatest difference was seen in the red colour parameter, a*, that increased more than twice. Visually, this means a shift towards a more orange colour. Compared to grazing in the meadow (ΔE* = 13.257), the addition of artificial pigments in the feed resulted in a more significant increase in the parameter ΔE* (CIE total colour difference), with the greatest value of ΔE* being observed with the use of both pigments (ΔE* = 24.265). CONCLUSION: Grazing increases the parameter a* whereas the values of the parameter C*(ab) remain relatively low. The parameter ΔE* is significantly lower in the case of grazing as compared to the supplementation of the feed with pigments. However, colourity parameters cannot be used as a specific standard to identify a particular grazing technology as their values vary during the laying period.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12024329
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121207121920.0
007      
ta
008      
120815s2012 enk f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/jsfa.4657 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22002540
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Dvořák, Petr $u Department of Biochemistry, Chemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. dvorakp@vfu.cz
245    10
$a Possibilities of enhancing the colour of egg yolk / $c P. Dvořák, P. Suchý, E. Straková, V. Kopřiva,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: This study attempts to compare two possibilities of enhancing the colour of egg yolk. One of them is based on the ecological rearing of laying hens on natural green grass whereas the other uses a feeding dose supplemented with natural pigments in laying hens reared in individual cages. Is it possible to distinguish these two technologies using yolk colour determination in the CIELAB system? RESULTS: Yolk colour parameters such as L*, a*, and b* in the group of grazed hens are significantly different (α = 0.001) from those observed in hens reared in cages. The yolk colour shows a darker, redder and more yellow colour. The greatest difference was seen in the red colour parameter, a*, that increased more than twice. Visually, this means a shift towards a more orange colour. Compared to grazing in the meadow (ΔE* = 13.257), the addition of artificial pigments in the feed resulted in a more significant increase in the parameter ΔE* (CIE total colour difference), with the greatest value of ΔE* being observed with the use of both pigments (ΔE* = 24.265). CONCLUSION: Grazing increases the parameter a* whereas the values of the parameter C*(ab) remain relatively low. The parameter ΔE* is significantly lower in the case of grazing as compared to the supplementation of the feed with pigments. However, colourity parameters cannot be used as a specific standard to identify a particular grazing technology as their values vary during the laying period.
650    _2
$a krmivo pro zvířata $x analýza $7 D000821
650    _2
$a chov zvířat $7 D000822
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a inbrední kmeny zvířat $7 D017849
650    _2
$a kur domácí $7 D002645
650    _2
$a vaječný žloutek $x metabolismus $7 D004530
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a květy $x chemie $7 D035264
650    _2
$a biologické pigmenty $x aplikace a dávkování $x metabolismus $7 D010860
650    _2
$a lipnicovité $x metabolismus $7 D006109
650    _2
$a Tagetes $x chemie $7 D031686
650    _2
$a xanthofyly $x aplikace a dávkování $x metabolismus $7 D024341
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Suchý, Pavel
700    1_
$a Straková, Eva
700    1_
$a Kopřiva, Vladimír
773    0_
$w MED00003015 $t Journal of the science of food and agriculture $x 1097-0010 $g Roč. 92, č. 4 (2012), s. 853-6
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22002540 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120815 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121207121954 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 946477 $s 781657
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 92 $c 4 $d 853-6 $i 1097-0010 $m Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture $n J Sci Food Agric $x MED00003015
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120815/12/02

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace