• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Aortic annulus and ascending aorta: comparison of preoperative and periooperative measurement in patients with aortic stenosis

M. Smíd, J. Ferda, J. Baxa, J. Cech, T. Hájek, B. Kreuzberg, R. Rokyta,

. 2010 ; 74 (1) : 152-5.

Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12026052

BACKGROUND: Precise determination of the aortic annulus size constitutes an integral part of the preoperative evaluation prior to aortic valve replacement. It enables the estimation of the size of prosthesis to be implanted. Knowledge of the size of the ascending aorta is required in the preoperative analysis and monitoring of its dilation enables the precise timing of the operation. Our goal was to compare the precision of measurement of the aortic annulus and ascending aorta using magnetic resonance (MR), multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with degenerative aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 15 patients scheduled to have aortic valve replacement were enrolled into this prospective study. TTE was performed in all patients and was supplemented with TEE, CT and MR in the majority of patients. The values obtained were compared with perioperative measurements. For the measurement of aortic annulus, MR was found to be the most precise technique, followed by MDCT, TTE, and TEE. For the measurement of ascending aorta, MR again was found to be the most precise technique, followed by MDCT, TEE, and TTE. CONCLUSION: In our study, magnetic resonance was found to be the most precise technique for the measurement of aortic annulus and ascending aorta in patients with severe degenerative aortic stenosis.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12026052
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121207101540.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2010 ie f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.028 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)19233583
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Smíd, Michal $u Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine Plzen, Charles University Prague and University Hospital Plzen, alej Svobody 80, 304 60 Plzen, Czech Republic. kosvin@seznam.cz
245    10
$a Aortic annulus and ascending aorta: comparison of preoperative and periooperative measurement in patients with aortic stenosis / $c M. Smíd, J. Ferda, J. Baxa, J. Cech, T. Hájek, B. Kreuzberg, R. Rokyta,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Precise determination of the aortic annulus size constitutes an integral part of the preoperative evaluation prior to aortic valve replacement. It enables the estimation of the size of prosthesis to be implanted. Knowledge of the size of the ascending aorta is required in the preoperative analysis and monitoring of its dilation enables the precise timing of the operation. Our goal was to compare the precision of measurement of the aortic annulus and ascending aorta using magnetic resonance (MR), multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with degenerative aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 15 patients scheduled to have aortic valve replacement were enrolled into this prospective study. TTE was performed in all patients and was supplemented with TEE, CT and MR in the majority of patients. The values obtained were compared with perioperative measurements. For the measurement of aortic annulus, MR was found to be the most precise technique, followed by MDCT, TTE, and TEE. For the measurement of ascending aorta, MR again was found to be the most precise technique, followed by MDCT, TEE, and TTE. CONCLUSION: In our study, magnetic resonance was found to be the most precise technique for the measurement of aortic annulus and ascending aorta in patients with severe degenerative aortic stenosis.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a aorta $x ultrasonografie $7 D001011
650    _2
$a aortální chlopeň $x patologie $x radiografie $x ultrasonografie $7 D001021
650    _2
$a aortální stenóza $x radiografie $x ultrasonografie $7 D001024
650    _2
$a echokardiografie $7 D004452
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a chirurgická náhrada chlopně $7 D019918
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a velikost orgánu $7 D009929
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Ferda, Jirí
700    1_
$a Baxa, Jan
700    1_
$a Cech, Jakub
700    1_
$a Hájek, Tomás
700    1_
$a Kreuzberg, Boris
700    1_
$a Rokyta, Richard
773    0_
$w MED00009640 $t European journal of radiology $x 1872-7727 $g Roč. 74, č. 1 (2010), s. 152-5
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19233583 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121207101614 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 948094 $s 783398
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2010 $b 74 $c 1 $d 152-5 $i 1872-7727 $m European journal of radiology $n Eur J Radiol $x MED00009640
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/10/03

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...