-
Something wrong with this record ?
Aortic annulus and ascending aorta: comparison of preoperative and periooperative measurement in patients with aortic stenosis
M. Smíd, J. Ferda, J. Baxa, J. Cech, T. Hájek, B. Kreuzberg, R. Rokyta,
Language English Country Ireland
Document type Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Aorta ultrasonography MeSH
- Aortic Valve pathology radiography ultrasonography MeSH
- Aortic Valve Stenosis radiography ultrasonography MeSH
- Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation MeSH
- Echocardiography MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Organ Size MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Precise determination of the aortic annulus size constitutes an integral part of the preoperative evaluation prior to aortic valve replacement. It enables the estimation of the size of prosthesis to be implanted. Knowledge of the size of the ascending aorta is required in the preoperative analysis and monitoring of its dilation enables the precise timing of the operation. Our goal was to compare the precision of measurement of the aortic annulus and ascending aorta using magnetic resonance (MR), multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with degenerative aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 15 patients scheduled to have aortic valve replacement were enrolled into this prospective study. TTE was performed in all patients and was supplemented with TEE, CT and MR in the majority of patients. The values obtained were compared with perioperative measurements. For the measurement of aortic annulus, MR was found to be the most precise technique, followed by MDCT, TTE, and TEE. For the measurement of ascending aorta, MR again was found to be the most precise technique, followed by MDCT, TEE, and TTE. CONCLUSION: In our study, magnetic resonance was found to be the most precise technique for the measurement of aortic annulus and ascending aorta in patients with severe degenerative aortic stenosis.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12026052
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121207101540.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2010 ie f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.028 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)19233583
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ie
- 100 1_
- $a Smíd, Michal $u Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine Plzen, Charles University Prague and University Hospital Plzen, alej Svobody 80, 304 60 Plzen, Czech Republic. kosvin@seznam.cz
- 245 10
- $a Aortic annulus and ascending aorta: comparison of preoperative and periooperative measurement in patients with aortic stenosis / $c M. Smíd, J. Ferda, J. Baxa, J. Cech, T. Hájek, B. Kreuzberg, R. Rokyta,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Precise determination of the aortic annulus size constitutes an integral part of the preoperative evaluation prior to aortic valve replacement. It enables the estimation of the size of prosthesis to be implanted. Knowledge of the size of the ascending aorta is required in the preoperative analysis and monitoring of its dilation enables the precise timing of the operation. Our goal was to compare the precision of measurement of the aortic annulus and ascending aorta using magnetic resonance (MR), multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with degenerative aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 15 patients scheduled to have aortic valve replacement were enrolled into this prospective study. TTE was performed in all patients and was supplemented with TEE, CT and MR in the majority of patients. The values obtained were compared with perioperative measurements. For the measurement of aortic annulus, MR was found to be the most precise technique, followed by MDCT, TTE, and TEE. For the measurement of ascending aorta, MR again was found to be the most precise technique, followed by MDCT, TEE, and TTE. CONCLUSION: In our study, magnetic resonance was found to be the most precise technique for the measurement of aortic annulus and ascending aorta in patients with severe degenerative aortic stenosis.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a aorta $x ultrasonografie $7 D001011
- 650 _2
- $a aortální chlopeň $x patologie $x radiografie $x ultrasonografie $7 D001021
- 650 _2
- $a aortální stenóza $x radiografie $x ultrasonografie $7 D001024
- 650 _2
- $a echokardiografie $7 D004452
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a chirurgická náhrada chlopně $7 D019918
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a velikost orgánu $7 D009929
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Ferda, Jirí
- 700 1_
- $a Baxa, Jan
- 700 1_
- $a Cech, Jakub
- 700 1_
- $a Hájek, Tomás
- 700 1_
- $a Kreuzberg, Boris
- 700 1_
- $a Rokyta, Richard
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009640 $t European journal of radiology $x 1872-7727 $g Roč. 74, č. 1 (2010), s. 152-5
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19233583 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121207101614 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 948094 $s 783398
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 74 $c 1 $d 152-5 $i 1872-7727 $m European journal of radiology $n Eur J Radiol $x MED00009640
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/10/03