-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Contrast-enhanced MR angiography utilizing parallel acquisition techniques in renal artery stenosis detection
M. Slanina, J. Zizka, L. Klzo, M. Lojík,
Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- algoritmy MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- interpretace obrazu počítačem metody MeSH
- kontrastní látky MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční angiografie metody MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- obstrukce renální arterie diagnóza MeSH
- organokovové sloučeniny diagnostické užití MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- vylepšení obrazu metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Significant renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a potentially curable cause of renovascular hypertension and/or renal impairment. It is caused by either atherosclerosis or fibromuscular dysplasia. Correct and timely diagnosis remains a diagnostic challenge. MR angiography (MRA) as a minimally invasive method seems to be suitable for RAS detection, however, its diagnostic value widely differs in the literature (sensitivity 62-100% and specificity 75-100%). The aim of our prospective study was to compare the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced MRA utilizing parallel acquisition techniques in the detection of significant RAS with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). A total of 78 hypertensive subjects with suspected renal artery stenosis were examined on a 1.5 Tesla MR system using a body array coil. Bolus tracking was used to monitor the arrival of contrast agent to the abdominal aorta. The MRA sequence parameters were as follows: TR 3.7 ms; TE 1.2 ms; flip angle 25 degrees; acquisition time 18s; voxel size 1.1 mm x1.0 mm x 1.1 mm; centric k-space sampling; parallel acquisition technique with acceleration factor of 2 (GRAPPA). Renal artery stenosis of 60% and more was considered hemodynamically significant. The results of MRA were compared to digital subtraction angiography serving as a standard of reference. Sensitivity and specificity of MRA in the detection of hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis were 90% and 96%, respectively. Prevalence of RAS was 39% in our study population. Contrast-enhanced MRA with high spatial resolution offers sufficient sensitivity and specificity for screening of RAS.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12026509
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121029120633.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2010 ie f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.010 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)19671492
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ie
- 100 1_
- $a Slanina, Martin $7 xx0101054 $u Department of Radiology, Charles University Prague, Medical Faculty & Teaching Hospital in Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, Hradec Králové 500 05, Czech Republic. slaninajicin@seznam.cz
- 245 10
- $a Contrast-enhanced MR angiography utilizing parallel acquisition techniques in renal artery stenosis detection / $c M. Slanina, J. Zizka, L. Klzo, M. Lojík,
- 520 9_
- $a Significant renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a potentially curable cause of renovascular hypertension and/or renal impairment. It is caused by either atherosclerosis or fibromuscular dysplasia. Correct and timely diagnosis remains a diagnostic challenge. MR angiography (MRA) as a minimally invasive method seems to be suitable for RAS detection, however, its diagnostic value widely differs in the literature (sensitivity 62-100% and specificity 75-100%). The aim of our prospective study was to compare the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced MRA utilizing parallel acquisition techniques in the detection of significant RAS with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). A total of 78 hypertensive subjects with suspected renal artery stenosis were examined on a 1.5 Tesla MR system using a body array coil. Bolus tracking was used to monitor the arrival of contrast agent to the abdominal aorta. The MRA sequence parameters were as follows: TR 3.7 ms; TE 1.2 ms; flip angle 25 degrees; acquisition time 18s; voxel size 1.1 mm x1.0 mm x 1.1 mm; centric k-space sampling; parallel acquisition technique with acceleration factor of 2 (GRAPPA). Renal artery stenosis of 60% and more was considered hemodynamically significant. The results of MRA were compared to digital subtraction angiography serving as a standard of reference. Sensitivity and specificity of MRA in the detection of hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis were 90% and 96%, respectively. Prevalence of RAS was 39% in our study population. Contrast-enhanced MRA with high spatial resolution offers sufficient sensitivity and specificity for screening of RAS.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 _2
- $a kontrastní látky $7 D003287
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a vylepšení obrazu $x metody $7 D007089
- 650 _2
- $a interpretace obrazu počítačem $x metody $7 D007090
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční angiografie $x metody $7 D018810
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a organokovové sloučeniny $x diagnostické užití $7 D009942
- 650 _2
- $a obstrukce renální arterie $x diagnóza $7 D012078
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Žižka, Jan
- 700 1_
- $a Klzo, Ludovít $7 xx0081745
- 700 1_
- $a Lojík, Miroslav, $d 1965- $7 xx0070973
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009640 $t European journal of radiology $x 1872-7727 $g Roč. 75, č. 1 (2010), s. e46-50
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19671492 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121029120634 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 948551 $s 783855
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 75 $c 1 $d e46-50 $i 1872-7727 $m European journal of radiology $n Eur J Radiol $x MED00009640
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/10/04