-
Something wrong with this record ?
In vitro antifungal effect of black cumin seed quinones against dairy spoilage yeasts at different acidity levels
K. Halamova, L. Kokoska, J. Flesar, O. Sklenickova, B. Svobodova, P. Marsik
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Freely Accessible Science Journals
from 1977 to 5 years ago
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01 to 2022-12-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01 to 2022-12-31
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01 to 2022-12-31
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
- MeSH
- Antifungal Agents pharmacology MeSH
- Quinones pharmacology MeSH
- Hydrogen-Ion Concentration MeSH
- Food Preservation methods MeSH
- Yeasts drug effects growth & development MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Milk microbiology MeSH
- Nigella sativa chemistry MeSH
- Colony Count, Microbial MeSH
- Food Preservatives pharmacology MeSH
- Consumer Product Safety MeSH
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
The antiyeast activity of the black cumin seed (Nigella sativa) quinones dithymoquinone, thymohydroquinone (THQ), and thymoquinone (TQ) were evaluated in vitro with a broth microdilution method against six dairy spoilage yeast species. Antifungal effects of the quinones were compared with those of preservatives commonly used in milk products (calcium propionate, natamycin, and potassium sorbate) at two pH levels (4.0 and 5.5). THQ and TQ possessed significant antiyeast activity and affected the growth of all strains tested at both pH levels, with MICs ranging from 8 to 128 μg/ml. With the exception of the antibiotic natamycin, the inhibitory effects of all food preservatives against the yeast strains tested in this study were strongly affected by differences in pH, with MICs of ≥16 and ≥512 μg/ml at pH 4.0 and 5.5, respectively. These findings suggest that HQ and TQ are effective antiyeast agents that could be used in the dairy industry as chemical preservatives of natural origin.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12026559
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160224074129.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120816s2010 xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.4315/0362-028x-73.12.2291 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21219751
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Halamová, Kateřina $7 xx0120191 $u Department of Crop Sciences and Agroforestry, Institute of Tropics and Subtropics, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Nature Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6-Suchdol, 165 21, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a In vitro antifungal effect of black cumin seed quinones against dairy spoilage yeasts at different acidity levels / $c K. Halamova, L. Kokoska, J. Flesar, O. Sklenickova, B. Svobodova, P. Marsik
- 520 9_
- $a The antiyeast activity of the black cumin seed (Nigella sativa) quinones dithymoquinone, thymohydroquinone (THQ), and thymoquinone (TQ) were evaluated in vitro with a broth microdilution method against six dairy spoilage yeast species. Antifungal effects of the quinones were compared with those of preservatives commonly used in milk products (calcium propionate, natamycin, and potassium sorbate) at two pH levels (4.0 and 5.5). THQ and TQ possessed significant antiyeast activity and affected the growth of all strains tested at both pH levels, with MICs ranging from 8 to 128 μg/ml. With the exception of the antibiotic natamycin, the inhibitory effects of all food preservatives against the yeast strains tested in this study were strongly affected by differences in pH, with MICs of ≥16 and ≥512 μg/ml at pH 4.0 and 5.5, respectively. These findings suggest that HQ and TQ are effective antiyeast agents that could be used in the dairy industry as chemical preservatives of natural origin.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a antifungální látky $x farmakologie $7 D000935
- 650 _2
- $a počet mikrobiálních kolonií $7 D015169
- 650 _2
- $a spotřebitelská bezpečnost produktů $7 D003257
- 650 _2
- $a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
- 650 _2
- $a konzervace potravin $x metody $7 D005519
- 650 _2
- $a potravinářské konzervační látky $x farmakologie $7 D005520
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a koncentrace vodíkových iontů $7 D006863
- 650 _2
- $a mléko $x mikrobiologie $7 D008892
- 650 _2
- $a Nigella sativa $x chemie $7 D031881
- 650 _2
- $a chinony $x farmakologie $7 D011809
- 650 _2
- $a kvasinky $x účinky léků $x růst a vývoj $7 D015003
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kokoška, Ladislav $7 pna2005280907 $u Department of Crop Sciences and Agroforestry, Institute of Tropics and Subtropics, Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Nature Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6-Suchdol
- 700 1_
- $a Flesar, Jaroslav $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Nature Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6-Suchdol
- 700 1_
- $a Sklenickova, Olga $u Department of Crop Sciences and Agroforestry, Institute of Tropics and Subtropics, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Nature Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6-Suchdol
- 700 1_
- $a Svobodová, Blanka $7 xx0116900 $u Department of Crop Sciences and Agroforestry, Institute of Tropics and Subtropics, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Nature Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6-Suchdol
- 700 1_
- $a Maršík, Petr $7 stk2008429102 $u Laboratory of Plant Biotechnologies, Joint Laboratory of Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR, v.v.i. and Research Institute of Crop Production, v.v.i., Rozvojova 263, Prague 6-Lysolaje
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006991 $t Journal of food protection $x 1944-9097 $g Roč. 73, č. 12 (2010), s. 2291-2295
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21219751 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120816 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160224074139 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 948601 $s 783905
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 73 $c 12 $d 2291-2295 $i 1944-9097 $m Journal of food protection $n J Food Prot $x MED00006991
- LZP __
- $b NLK122 $a Pubmed-20120816/11/01