-
Something wrong with this record ?
ELISA kit for mustard protein determination: interlaboratory study
P. Cuhra, D. Gabrovská, J. Rysová, P. Hanák, F. Stumr
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
21563696
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Food Analysis methods MeSH
- Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay methods MeSH
- Mustard Plant chemistry MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Plant Proteins metabolism MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
An interlaboratory study in 12 laboratories was performed to prove the validation of the ELISA method developed for the quantitative determination of mustard protein in foods. The ELISA kit used for this study is based on rabbit polyclonal antibody. This kit did not produce any false-positive results or cross-reactivity with in-house validation for a broad range of food matrixes with no detectable mustard protein. All participants obtained the Mustard ELISA kit with standard operational procedures, a list of samples, samples, and a protocol for recording test results. The study included 15 food samples and two spiked samples. Seven food matrix samples of zero mustard content and four samples with mustard declared as an ingredient showed mustard protein content lower than that of the first standard (0.42 mg/kg). Four samples with mustard declared as an ingredient revealed mustard protein content above 12.5 mg/kg (the highest standard). The statistical tests (Cochran, Dixon, and Mandel) and analysis of variance were used to evaluate the interlaboratory study results. Repeatability and reproducibility limits, as well as an LOQ (1.8 mg mustard proteins/kg) and LOD (0.5 mg mustard proteins/kg), for the kit were calculated.
Czech Agriculture and Food Inspection Authority Za Opravnou 300 6 150 06 Praha 5 Czech Republic
Food Research Institute Prague Radiov 7 102 31 Praha 10 Czech Republic
SEDIUM RD Ltd elezni nho pluku 1361 530 02 Pardubice Czech Republic
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12026981
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160601083523.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120816s2011 xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21563696
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Cuhra, Petr $7 xx0097724 $u Czech Agriculture and Food Inspection Authority, Za Opravnou 300/6, 150 06 Praha 5, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a ELISA kit for mustard protein determination: interlaboratory study / $c P. Cuhra, D. Gabrovská, J. Rysová, P. Hanák, F. Stumr
- 520 9_
- $a An interlaboratory study in 12 laboratories was performed to prove the validation of the ELISA method developed for the quantitative determination of mustard protein in foods. The ELISA kit used for this study is based on rabbit polyclonal antibody. This kit did not produce any false-positive results or cross-reactivity with in-house validation for a broad range of food matrixes with no detectable mustard protein. All participants obtained the Mustard ELISA kit with standard operational procedures, a list of samples, samples, and a protocol for recording test results. The study included 15 food samples and two spiked samples. Seven food matrix samples of zero mustard content and four samples with mustard declared as an ingredient showed mustard protein content lower than that of the first standard (0.42 mg/kg). Four samples with mustard declared as an ingredient revealed mustard protein content above 12.5 mg/kg (the highest standard). The statistical tests (Cochran, Dixon, and Mandel) and analysis of variance were used to evaluate the interlaboratory study results. Repeatability and reproducibility limits, as well as an LOQ (1.8 mg mustard proteins/kg) and LOD (0.5 mg mustard proteins/kg), for the kit were calculated.
- 650 _2
- $a ELISA $x metody $7 D004797
- 650 _2
- $a analýza potravin $x metody $7 D005504
- 650 _2
- $a hořčice rodu Brassica $x chemie $7 D009149
- 650 _2
- $a rostlinné proteiny $x metabolismus $7 D010940
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Gabrovská, Dana $7 uzp2010572845 $u Food Research Institute Prague, Radiov 7, 102 31 Praha 10, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rysová, Jana $7 xx0097722 $u Food Research Institute Prague, Radiov 7, 102 31 Praha 10, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hanák, Petr $7 xx0266615 $u Food Research Institute Prague, Radiov 7, 102 31 Praha 10, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Štumr, František $7 xx0247104 $u SEDIUM RD, Ltd, elezni.nho pluku 1361, 530 02 Pardubice, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002515 $t Journal of AOAC International $x 1060-3271 $g Roč. 94, č. 2 (2011), s. 605-610
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21563696 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120816 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160601083646 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 949023 $s 784327
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 94 $c 2 $d 605-610 $i 1060-3271 $m Journal of AOAC International $n J AOAC Int $x MED00002515
- LZP __
- $b NLK122 $a Pubmed-20120816/11/02