Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Are pulmonary artery pulsatility indexes able to differentiate chronic pulmonary thromboembolism from pulmonary arterial hypertension? An echocardiographic and catheterization study

T. Palecek, P. Jansa, D. Ambroz, Z. Hlubocka, J. Horak, M. Skvarilova, M. Aschermann, A. Linhart

. 2011 ; 26 (2) : 176-182.

Jazyk angličtina Země Japonsko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12027317
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2000-01-01 do 2018-12-31
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2003-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2000-01-01 do 2018-12-31

The differentiation between chronic pulmonary thromboembolic hypertension (CTEPH) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a clinical challenge. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of both echocardiographically and invasively derived pulmonary artery pulsatility indexes in the etiologic differentiation of patients with CTEPH and PAH. We retrospectively analyzed the results of echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamic examinations in 125 patients with either CTEPH (n = 62) or PAH (n = 63). Invasive data were obtained in 52 patients with CTEPH and 43 PAH patients. Using echocardiography, pulmonary artery systolic (PASP), diastolic (PADP) and mean (PAMP) pressures were estimated from velocities of tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary regurgitation, respectively. Pulse pressure (PP) was calculated as the difference between PASP and PADP. To obtain pulmonary artery pulsatility indexes, we normalized PP by PASP (PP/PASP), by PAMP (PP/PAMP) and by PADP (PP/PADP). Pulsatility indexes assessed by echocardiography did not differ between CTEPH and PAH patients except for PP/PAMP [PP/PAMP (1.82 ± 0.33 vs. 1.40 ± 0.3, p < 0.001)]. Invasively derived pulsatility indexes were significantly higher in subjects with CTEPH (0.60 ± 0.08 vs. 0.53 ± 0.09 for PP/PASP; 0.98 ± 0.21 vs. 0.81 ± 0.21 for PP/PAMP; 1.58 ± 0.52 vs. 1.21 ± 0.41 for PP/PADP; all p < 0.001). The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves analysis showed that no cutoff value allowed discriminating between CTEPH and PAH by using echocardiographically or invasively derived pulsatility indices. Invasively derived pulmonary artery pulsatility indexes as well as echocardiographically determined PP/PAMP indexes are higher in CTEPH compared to PAH. However, due to the important overlap no optimal threshold values of these parameters can be given to allow satisfactory discrimination of the two diseases in clinical practice.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12027317
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160302140827.0
007      
ta
008      
120816s2011 ja f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00380-010-0044-x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)20953614
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ja
100    1_
$a Paleček, Tomáš, $d 1971- $7 uk2008438218 $u 2nd Medical Department, Clinical Department of Cardiology and Angiology, General University Hospital, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University of Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128-08, Prague 2, Czech Republic. tpalec@lf1.cuni.cz
245    10
$a Are pulmonary artery pulsatility indexes able to differentiate chronic pulmonary thromboembolism from pulmonary arterial hypertension? An echocardiographic and catheterization study / $c T. Palecek, P. Jansa, D. Ambroz, Z. Hlubocka, J. Horak, M. Skvarilova, M. Aschermann, A. Linhart
520    9_
$a The differentiation between chronic pulmonary thromboembolic hypertension (CTEPH) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a clinical challenge. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of both echocardiographically and invasively derived pulmonary artery pulsatility indexes in the etiologic differentiation of patients with CTEPH and PAH. We retrospectively analyzed the results of echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamic examinations in 125 patients with either CTEPH (n = 62) or PAH (n = 63). Invasive data were obtained in 52 patients with CTEPH and 43 PAH patients. Using echocardiography, pulmonary artery systolic (PASP), diastolic (PADP) and mean (PAMP) pressures were estimated from velocities of tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary regurgitation, respectively. Pulse pressure (PP) was calculated as the difference between PASP and PADP. To obtain pulmonary artery pulsatility indexes, we normalized PP by PASP (PP/PASP), by PAMP (PP/PAMP) and by PADP (PP/PADP). Pulsatility indexes assessed by echocardiography did not differ between CTEPH and PAH patients except for PP/PAMP [PP/PAMP (1.82 ± 0.33 vs. 1.40 ± 0.3, p < 0.001)]. Invasively derived pulsatility indexes were significantly higher in subjects with CTEPH (0.60 ± 0.08 vs. 0.53 ± 0.09 for PP/PASP; 0.98 ± 0.21 vs. 0.81 ± 0.21 for PP/PAMP; 1.58 ± 0.52 vs. 1.21 ± 0.41 for PP/PADP; all p < 0.001). The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves analysis showed that no cutoff value allowed discriminating between CTEPH and PAH by using echocardiographically or invasively derived pulsatility indices. Invasively derived pulmonary artery pulsatility indexes as well as echocardiographically determined PP/PAMP indexes are higher in CTEPH compared to PAH. However, due to the important overlap no optimal threshold values of these parameters can be given to allow satisfactory discrimination of the two diseases in clinical practice.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a krevní tlak $7 D001794
650    _2
$a chronická nemoc $7 D002908
650    _2
$a diferenciální diagnóza $7 D003937
650    _2
$a dopplerovská echokardiografie $7 D015150
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a srdeční katetrizace $7 D006328
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a plicní hypertenze $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D006976
650    _2
$a lineární modely $7 D016014
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a arteria pulmonalis $x patofyziologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D011651
650    _2
$a plicní oběh $7 D011652
650    _2
$a plicní embolie $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D011655
650    _2
$a pulzatilní průtok $7 D011673
650    _2
$a ROC křivka $7 D012372
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Jansa, Pavel, $d 1971- $7 jo2008427138 $u 2nd Medical Department, Clinical Department of Cardiology and Angiology, General University Hospital, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University of Prague
700    1_
$a Ambrož, David $7 xx0072987 $u 2nd Medical Department, Clinical Department of Cardiology and Angiology, General University Hospital, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University of Prague
700    1_
$a Hlubocká, Zuzana $7 xx0074060 $u 2nd Medical Department, Clinical Department of Cardiology and Angiology, General University Hospital, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University of Prague
700    1_
$a Horák, Jan, $d 1953- $7 jx20040720041 $u 2nd Medical Department, Clinical Department of Cardiology and Angiology, General University Hospital, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University of Prague
700    1_
$a Škvařilová, Marcela, $d 1954- $7 xx0104255 $u 2nd Medical Department, Clinical Department of Cardiology and Angiology, General University Hospital, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University of Prague
700    1_
$a Aschermann, Michael, $d 1944- $7 nlk19990072993 $u 2nd Medical Department, Clinical Department of Cardiology and Angiology, General University Hospital, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University of Prague
700    1_
$a Linhart, Aleš, $d 1964- $u 2nd Medical Department, Clinical Department of Cardiology and Angiology, General University Hospital, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University of Prague $7 mzk2003188958
773    0_
$w MED00009797 $t Heart and vessels $x 1615-2573 $g Roč. 26, č. 2 (2011), s. 176-182
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20953614 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120816 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160302140545 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 949359 $s 784663
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 26 $c 2 $d 176-182 $i 1615-2573 $m Heart and vessels $n Heart Vessels $x MED00009797
LZP    __
$b NLK112 $a Pubmed-20120816/11/02

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...