-
Something wrong with this record ?
Radiofrequency-assisted liver resection: higher incidence of infectious complications?
Z. Subrt, A. Ferko, B. Jon, F. Cecka,
Language English Country Belgium
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Hepatectomy adverse effects methods MeSH
- Incidence MeSH
- Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Catheter Ablation adverse effects MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Metastasis MeSH
- Liver Neoplasms secondary surgery MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
AIM: To evaluate clinical experience with radiofrequency (RF)-assisted liver resection in non-cirrhotic and non-cholestatic patients with metastatic liver disease. METHODS: A group of consecutive patients who underwent RF-assisted liver resection for metastatic liver disease was prospectively followed. RESULTS: Between July 2005 and April 2008, 95 liver RF-assisted liver resections were performed, 71 of them for metastatic liver disease. The mean hospital stay was 14 (range 5-40) days. The mean operation time was 141 (range 64-233) minutes. The mean duration of RF coagulation was 10 (range 9-12) minutes. A total of 37 complications in 24 (33%) patients were recorded, including 12 (16.9%) infected collections in resection line that had to be drained percutaneously. The 30-day postoperative mortality was zero. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that RF-assisted resection may have a benefit in decreasing peroperative blood loss and the number of blood transfusions. Nevertheless, an increased incidence of infectious complications and pleural effusions that required evacuation was noted.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12027467
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121206103450.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2011 be f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/00015458.2011.11680729 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21780524
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a be
- 100 1_
- $a Subrt, Z $u Department of Surgery, Charles University and University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. subrt@email.cz
- 245 10
- $a Radiofrequency-assisted liver resection: higher incidence of infectious complications? / $c Z. Subrt, A. Ferko, B. Jon, F. Cecka,
- 520 9_
- $a AIM: To evaluate clinical experience with radiofrequency (RF)-assisted liver resection in non-cirrhotic and non-cholestatic patients with metastatic liver disease. METHODS: A group of consecutive patients who underwent RF-assisted liver resection for metastatic liver disease was prospectively followed. RESULTS: Between July 2005 and April 2008, 95 liver RF-assisted liver resections were performed, 71 of them for metastatic liver disease. The mean hospital stay was 14 (range 5-40) days. The mean operation time was 141 (range 64-233) minutes. The mean duration of RF coagulation was 10 (range 9-12) minutes. A total of 37 complications in 24 (33%) patients were recorded, including 12 (16.9%) infected collections in resection line that had to be drained percutaneously. The 30-day postoperative mortality was zero. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that RF-assisted resection may have a benefit in decreasing peroperative blood loss and the number of blood transfusions. Nevertheless, an increased incidence of infectious complications and pleural effusions that required evacuation was noted.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a katetrizační ablace $x škodlivé účinky $7 D017115
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a hepatektomie $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D006498
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a incidence $7 D015994
- 650 _2
- $a nádory jater $x sekundární $x chirurgie $7 D008113
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a metastázy nádorů $7 D009362
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a infekce chirurgické rány $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D013530
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Ferko, A
- 700 1_
- $a Jon, B
- 700 1_
- $a Cecka, F
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000059 $t Acta chirurgica Belgica $x 0001-5458 $g Roč. 111, č. 3 (2011), s. 165-70
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21780524 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121206103524 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 949509 $s 784813
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 111 $c 3 $d 165-70 $i 0001-5458 $m Acta chirurgica belgica $n Acta Chir Belg $x MED00000059
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/11/03
