-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
V. Pecha, D. Kolarik, R. Kozevnikova, K. Hovorkova, P. Hrabetova, M. Halaska, O. Sottner, M. Trnkova, L. Petruzelka, H. Kolarova,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
NS10453
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Článek
Zdroj
NLK
Wiley Online Library (archiv)
od 1948-01-01 do 2012-12-31
Wiley Free Content
od 1996 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
21437896
DOI
10.1002/cncr.26102
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adjuvantní chemoterapie MeSH
- axila MeSH
- biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- falešně negativní reakce MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lymfatické metastázy MeSH
- lymfatické uzliny patologie chirurgie MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery analýza MeSH
- nádory prsu chemie farmakoterapie patologie chirurgie MeSH
- neoadjuvantní terapie metody MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely used staging method for patients with early breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy modifies the anatomical conditions in the breast and axilla, and thus SLNB remains controversial in patients treated preoperatively. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the reliability and accuracy of this procedure in this particular group of patients. METHODS: The retrospective study analyzed medical records of patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer between the years 2005 and 2009. Of the patients treated by neoadjuvant therapy, 343 underwent lymphatic mapping to identify sentinel lymph nodes, and these were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The overall detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes was 80.8%. It was strongly influenced by clinical lymph node status (significantly higher success rate in lymph node-negative patients); higher detection rates were also associated with age <50 years, estrogen receptor positivity, lower proliferation index, and absent lymphovascular space invasion. The false-negative rate was 19.5% and was only marginally significantly dependent on lymphovascular space invasion. The overall accuracy of the method was 91.5%. CONCLUSIONS: By using the present technique, sentinel lymph node biopsy cannot be recommended as a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status when performed at the authors' institution after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Infrequent use of blue dye for lymphatic mapping, low number of resected sentinel lymph nodes, and absence of any selection among patients included in the study could be the main factors responsible for the low detection rate and high false-negative rate.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13001020
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240125152845.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130108s2011 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/cncr.26102 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21437896
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Pecha, Vaclav $u Department of Oncosurgery, Medicon Spolecnost S Eucenim Omezenym, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy / $c V. Pecha, D. Kolarik, R. Kozevnikova, K. Hovorkova, P. Hrabetova, M. Halaska, O. Sottner, M. Trnkova, L. Petruzelka, H. Kolarova,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely used staging method for patients with early breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy modifies the anatomical conditions in the breast and axilla, and thus SLNB remains controversial in patients treated preoperatively. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the reliability and accuracy of this procedure in this particular group of patients. METHODS: The retrospective study analyzed medical records of patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer between the years 2005 and 2009. Of the patients treated by neoadjuvant therapy, 343 underwent lymphatic mapping to identify sentinel lymph nodes, and these were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The overall detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes was 80.8%. It was strongly influenced by clinical lymph node status (significantly higher success rate in lymph node-negative patients); higher detection rates were also associated with age <50 years, estrogen receptor positivity, lower proliferation index, and absent lymphovascular space invasion. The false-negative rate was 19.5% and was only marginally significantly dependent on lymphovascular space invasion. The overall accuracy of the method was 91.5%. CONCLUSIONS: By using the present technique, sentinel lymph node biopsy cannot be recommended as a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status when performed at the authors' institution after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Infrequent use of blue dye for lymphatic mapping, low number of resected sentinel lymph nodes, and absence of any selection among patients included in the study could be the main factors responsible for the low detection rate and high false-negative rate.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
- 650 _2
- $a axila $7 D001365
- 650 _2
- $a nádory prsu $x chemie $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D001943
- 650 _2
- $a adjuvantní chemoterapie $7 D017024
- 650 _2
- $a falešně negativní reakce $7 D005188
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lymfatické uzliny $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D008198
- 650 _2
- $a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a neoadjuvantní terapie $x metody $7 D020360
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny $7 D021701
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x analýza $7 D014408
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kolarik, Dusan
- 700 1_
- $a Kozevnikova, Renata
- 700 1_
- $a Hovorková, Karolína $7 xx0220051
- 700 1_
- $a Hrabětová, Petra $7 xx0220048
- 700 1_
- $a Halaska, Michael
- 700 1_
- $a Sottner, Oldrich
- 700 1_
- $a Trnkova, Marketa
- 700 1_
- $a Petruzelka, Lubos
- 700 1_
- $a Kolarova, Hana
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001031 $t Cancer $x 0008-543X $g Roč. 117, č. 20 (2011), s. 4606-4616
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21437896 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240125152839 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 963802 $s 799184
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 117 $c 20 $d 4606-4616 $i 0008-543X $m Cancer $n Cancer $x MED00001031
- GRA __
- $a NS10453 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130108