Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

V. Pecha, D. Kolarik, R. Kozevnikova, K. Hovorkova, P. Hrabetova, M. Halaska, O. Sottner, M. Trnkova, L. Petruzelka, H. Kolarova,

. 2011 ; 117 (20) : 4606-4616.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13001020

Grantová podpora
NS10453 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely used staging method for patients with early breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy modifies the anatomical conditions in the breast and axilla, and thus SLNB remains controversial in patients treated preoperatively. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the reliability and accuracy of this procedure in this particular group of patients. METHODS: The retrospective study analyzed medical records of patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer between the years 2005 and 2009. Of the patients treated by neoadjuvant therapy, 343 underwent lymphatic mapping to identify sentinel lymph nodes, and these were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The overall detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes was 80.8%. It was strongly influenced by clinical lymph node status (significantly higher success rate in lymph node-negative patients); higher detection rates were also associated with age <50 years, estrogen receptor positivity, lower proliferation index, and absent lymphovascular space invasion. The false-negative rate was 19.5% and was only marginally significantly dependent on lymphovascular space invasion. The overall accuracy of the method was 91.5%. CONCLUSIONS: By using the present technique, sentinel lymph node biopsy cannot be recommended as a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status when performed at the authors' institution after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Infrequent use of blue dye for lymphatic mapping, low number of resected sentinel lymph nodes, and absence of any selection among patients included in the study could be the main factors responsible for the low detection rate and high false-negative rate.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13001020
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240125152845.0
007      
ta
008      
130108s2011 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/cncr.26102 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21437896
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Pecha, Vaclav $u Department of Oncosurgery, Medicon Spolecnost S Eucenim Omezenym, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy / $c V. Pecha, D. Kolarik, R. Kozevnikova, K. Hovorkova, P. Hrabetova, M. Halaska, O. Sottner, M. Trnkova, L. Petruzelka, H. Kolarova,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely used staging method for patients with early breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy modifies the anatomical conditions in the breast and axilla, and thus SLNB remains controversial in patients treated preoperatively. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the reliability and accuracy of this procedure in this particular group of patients. METHODS: The retrospective study analyzed medical records of patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer between the years 2005 and 2009. Of the patients treated by neoadjuvant therapy, 343 underwent lymphatic mapping to identify sentinel lymph nodes, and these were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The overall detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes was 80.8%. It was strongly influenced by clinical lymph node status (significantly higher success rate in lymph node-negative patients); higher detection rates were also associated with age <50 years, estrogen receptor positivity, lower proliferation index, and absent lymphovascular space invasion. The false-negative rate was 19.5% and was only marginally significantly dependent on lymphovascular space invasion. The overall accuracy of the method was 91.5%. CONCLUSIONS: By using the present technique, sentinel lymph node biopsy cannot be recommended as a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status when performed at the authors' institution after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Infrequent use of blue dye for lymphatic mapping, low number of resected sentinel lymph nodes, and absence of any selection among patients included in the study could be the main factors responsible for the low detection rate and high false-negative rate.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
650    _2
$a axila $7 D001365
650    _2
$a nádory prsu $x chemie $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D001943
650    _2
$a adjuvantní chemoterapie $7 D017024
650    _2
$a falešně negativní reakce $7 D005188
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lymfatické uzliny $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D008198
650    _2
$a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a neoadjuvantní terapie $x metody $7 D020360
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny $7 D021701
650    _2
$a nádorové biomarkery $x analýza $7 D014408
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kolarik, Dusan
700    1_
$a Kozevnikova, Renata
700    1_
$a Hovorková, Karolína $7 xx0220051
700    1_
$a Hrabětová, Petra $7 xx0220048
700    1_
$a Halaska, Michael
700    1_
$a Sottner, Oldrich
700    1_
$a Trnkova, Marketa
700    1_
$a Petruzelka, Lubos
700    1_
$a Kolarova, Hana
773    0_
$w MED00001031 $t Cancer $x 0008-543X $g Roč. 117, č. 20 (2011), s. 4606-4616
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21437896 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240125152839 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 963802 $s 799184
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 117 $c 20 $d 4606-4616 $i 0008-543X $m Cancer $n Cancer $x MED00001031
GRA    __
$a NS10453 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130108

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...