• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Utilization of cone beam CT for reconstruction of dose distribution delivered in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma - bony landmark setup compared to fiducial markers setup

P. Paluska, J. Hanus, J. Sefrova, L. Rouskova, J. Grepl, J. Jansa, L. Kasaova, M. Hodek, M. Zouhar, M. Vosmik, J. Petera,

. 2013 ; 14 (3) : 4203.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc14040758

The purpose of this study was to compare two different styles of prostate IGRT: bony landmark (BL) setup vs. fiducial markers (FM) setup. Twenty-nine prostate patients were treated with daily BL setup and 30 patients with daily FM setup. Delivered dose distribution was reconstructed on cone-beam CT (CBCT) acquired once a week immediately after the alignment. Target dose coverage was evaluated by the proportion of the CTV encompassed by the 95% isodose. Original plans employed 1 cm safety margin. Alternative plans assuming smaller 7 mm margin between CTV and PTV were evaluated in the same way. Rectal and bladder volumes were compared with initial ones. While the margin reduction in case of BL setup makes the prostate coverage significantly worse (p = 0.0003, McNemar's test), in case of FM setup with the reduced 7 mm margin, the prostate coverage is even better compared to BL setup with 10 mm margin (p = 0.049, Fisher's exact test). Moreover, partial volumes of organs at risk irradiated with a specific dose can be significantly lowered (p < 0.0001, unpaired t-test). Reducing of safety margin is not acceptable in case of BL setup, while the margin can be lowered from 10 mm to 7 mm in case of FM setup.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14040758
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140220095853.0
007      
ta
008      
140107s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1120/jacmp.v14i3.4203 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23652250
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Paluska, Petr
245    10
$a Utilization of cone beam CT for reconstruction of dose distribution delivered in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma - bony landmark setup compared to fiducial markers setup / $c P. Paluska, J. Hanus, J. Sefrova, L. Rouskova, J. Grepl, J. Jansa, L. Kasaova, M. Hodek, M. Zouhar, M. Vosmik, J. Petera,
520    9_
$a The purpose of this study was to compare two different styles of prostate IGRT: bony landmark (BL) setup vs. fiducial markers (FM) setup. Twenty-nine prostate patients were treated with daily BL setup and 30 patients with daily FM setup. Delivered dose distribution was reconstructed on cone-beam CT (CBCT) acquired once a week immediately after the alignment. Target dose coverage was evaluated by the proportion of the CTV encompassed by the 95% isodose. Original plans employed 1 cm safety margin. Alternative plans assuming smaller 7 mm margin between CTV and PTV were evaluated in the same way. Rectal and bladder volumes were compared with initial ones. While the margin reduction in case of BL setup makes the prostate coverage significantly worse (p = 0.0003, McNemar's test), in case of FM setup with the reduced 7 mm margin, the prostate coverage is even better compared to BL setup with 10 mm margin (p = 0.049, Fisher's exact test). Moreover, partial volumes of organs at risk irradiated with a specific dose can be significantly lowered (p &lt; 0.0001, unpaired t-test). Reducing of safety margin is not acceptable in case of BL setup, while the margin can be lowered from 10 mm to 7 mm in case of FM setup.
650    _2
$a adenokarcinom $x radioterapie $7 D000230
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a počítačová tomografie s kuželovým svazkem $x využití $7 D054893
650    12
$a zaměřovací značky pro radioterapii $7 D057918
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    _2
$a nádory prostaty $x radioterapie $7 D011471
650    _2
$a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
650    _2
$a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $7 D011880
650    12
$a radioterapie řízená obrazem $7 D061089
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Hanus, Josef $u -
700    1_
$a Sefrova, Jana $u -
700    1_
$a Rouskova, Lucie $u -
700    1_
$a Grepl, Jakub $u -
700    1_
$a Jansa, Jan $u -
700    1_
$a Kasaova, Linda $u -
700    1_
$a Hodek, Miroslav $u -
700    1_
$a Zouhar, Milan $u -
700    1_
$a Vosmik, Milan $u -
700    1_
$a Petera, Jiri $u -
773    0_
$w MED00182991 $t Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics $x 1526-9914 $g Roč. 14, č. 3 (2013), s. 4203
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23652250 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140107 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140220100701 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1005154 $s 839270
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 14 $c 3 $d 4203 $i 1526-9914 $m Journal of applied clinical medical physics $n J Appl Clin Med Phys $x MED00182991
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140107

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...