Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Comparison of an HPTLC method with the Reflectoquant assay for rapid determination of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in honey

A. Hošťálková, I. Klingelhöfer, GE. Morlock,

. 2013 ; 405 (28) : 9207-18.

Language English Country Germany

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2003-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago

5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) was analyzed in 17 botanical varieties of honey from 12 countries. A recently developed high-performance thin-layer chromatographic (HPTLC) method was limited because of increased matrix effects at higher honey sample loading. Therefore, the method was modified to achieve higher sensitivity and eliminate matrix interference by use of rectangular application combined with a focusing step. The HPTLC results were compared with results from the new spectrophotometric Reflectoquant hydroxymethylfurfural assay. Both methods had quantification limits of 4 mg kg(-1) and were suitable for rapid quantification of HMF in honey at the strictest regulated level of 15 mg kg(-1). Comparable results were obtained for the 17 honey samples, with a mean deviation of 2.9 mg kg(-1) (15%). The optimized HPTLC method was proved to be highly matrix-robust and was validated for the 17 different honey matrices (correlation coefficients ≥0.9994 (n = 6), mean intra-day precision 3.2% (n = 3 within a plate; n = 2 repeated within a day), mean inter-day precision 3.7% (n = 3), mean reproducibility over the whole procedure including sample preparation 4.1% (n = 2), and mean recovery 106.9% (n = 5 different concentrations; n = 4 different honey matrices). Recovery for a range of different application volumes, and thus for different honey matrix loading, differed by only ≤4.2%. HMF results when calculated by use of external calibration and by use of the standard addition method varied by 8.8%. Both revealed that any matrix effect was minor and that the original matrix interference problem was successfully solved.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14063924
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140707121603.0
007      
ta
008      
140704s2013 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00216-013-7339-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24091734
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Hošťálková, Anna $u ADINACO Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Botany and Ecology, Charles University, Heyrovskeho 1203, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Comparison of an HPTLC method with the Reflectoquant assay for rapid determination of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in honey / $c A. Hošťálková, I. Klingelhöfer, GE. Morlock,
520    9_
$a 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) was analyzed in 17 botanical varieties of honey from 12 countries. A recently developed high-performance thin-layer chromatographic (HPTLC) method was limited because of increased matrix effects at higher honey sample loading. Therefore, the method was modified to achieve higher sensitivity and eliminate matrix interference by use of rectangular application combined with a focusing step. The HPTLC results were compared with results from the new spectrophotometric Reflectoquant hydroxymethylfurfural assay. Both methods had quantification limits of 4 mg kg(-1) and were suitable for rapid quantification of HMF in honey at the strictest regulated level of 15 mg kg(-1). Comparable results were obtained for the 17 honey samples, with a mean deviation of 2.9 mg kg(-1) (15%). The optimized HPTLC method was proved to be highly matrix-robust and was validated for the 17 different honey matrices (correlation coefficients ≥0.9994 (n = 6), mean intra-day precision 3.2% (n = 3 within a plate; n = 2 repeated within a day), mean inter-day precision 3.7% (n = 3), mean reproducibility over the whole procedure including sample preparation 4.1% (n = 2), and mean recovery 106.9% (n = 5 different concentrations; n = 4 different honey matrices). Recovery for a range of different application volumes, and thus for different honey matrix loading, differed by only ≤4.2%. HMF results when calculated by use of external calibration and by use of the standard addition method varied by 8.8%. Both revealed that any matrix effect was minor and that the original matrix interference problem was successfully solved.
650    _2
$a chromatografie na tenké vrstvě $x metody $7 D002855
650    _2
$a kontaminace potravin $x analýza $7 D005506
650    _2
$a 2-furaldehyd $x analogy a deriváty $x analýza $7 D005662
650    _2
$a med $x analýza $7 D006722
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a spektrofotometrie $x metody $7 D013053
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Klingelhöfer, Ines
700    1_
$a Morlock, Gertrud E
773    0_
$w MED00006638 $t Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry $x 1618-2650 $g Roč. 405, č. 28 (2013), s. 9207-18
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24091734 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140704 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140707121852 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1031408 $s 862656
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 405 $c 28 $d 9207-18 $i 1618-2650 $m Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry $n Anal Bioanal Chem $x MED00006638
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140704

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...