-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of an HPTLC method with the Reflectoquant assay for rapid determination of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in honey
A. Hošťálková, I. Klingelhöfer, GE. Morlock,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2003-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Furaldehyde analogs & derivatives analysis MeSH
- Chromatography, Thin Layer methods MeSH
- Food Contamination analysis MeSH
- Honey analysis MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Spectrophotometry methods MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) was analyzed in 17 botanical varieties of honey from 12 countries. A recently developed high-performance thin-layer chromatographic (HPTLC) method was limited because of increased matrix effects at higher honey sample loading. Therefore, the method was modified to achieve higher sensitivity and eliminate matrix interference by use of rectangular application combined with a focusing step. The HPTLC results were compared with results from the new spectrophotometric Reflectoquant hydroxymethylfurfural assay. Both methods had quantification limits of 4 mg kg(-1) and were suitable for rapid quantification of HMF in honey at the strictest regulated level of 15 mg kg(-1). Comparable results were obtained for the 17 honey samples, with a mean deviation of 2.9 mg kg(-1) (15%). The optimized HPTLC method was proved to be highly matrix-robust and was validated for the 17 different honey matrices (correlation coefficients ≥0.9994 (n = 6), mean intra-day precision 3.2% (n = 3 within a plate; n = 2 repeated within a day), mean inter-day precision 3.7% (n = 3), mean reproducibility over the whole procedure including sample preparation 4.1% (n = 2), and mean recovery 106.9% (n = 5 different concentrations; n = 4 different honey matrices). Recovery for a range of different application volumes, and thus for different honey matrix loading, differed by only ≤4.2%. HMF results when calculated by use of external calibration and by use of the standard addition method varied by 8.8%. Both revealed that any matrix effect was minor and that the original matrix interference problem was successfully solved.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14063924
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140707121603.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140704s2013 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00216-013-7339-6 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24091734
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Hošťálková, Anna $u ADINACO Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Botany and Ecology, Charles University, Heyrovskeho 1203, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of an HPTLC method with the Reflectoquant assay for rapid determination of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in honey / $c A. Hošťálková, I. Klingelhöfer, GE. Morlock,
- 520 9_
- $a 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) was analyzed in 17 botanical varieties of honey from 12 countries. A recently developed high-performance thin-layer chromatographic (HPTLC) method was limited because of increased matrix effects at higher honey sample loading. Therefore, the method was modified to achieve higher sensitivity and eliminate matrix interference by use of rectangular application combined with a focusing step. The HPTLC results were compared with results from the new spectrophotometric Reflectoquant hydroxymethylfurfural assay. Both methods had quantification limits of 4 mg kg(-1) and were suitable for rapid quantification of HMF in honey at the strictest regulated level of 15 mg kg(-1). Comparable results were obtained for the 17 honey samples, with a mean deviation of 2.9 mg kg(-1) (15%). The optimized HPTLC method was proved to be highly matrix-robust and was validated for the 17 different honey matrices (correlation coefficients ≥0.9994 (n = 6), mean intra-day precision 3.2% (n = 3 within a plate; n = 2 repeated within a day), mean inter-day precision 3.7% (n = 3), mean reproducibility over the whole procedure including sample preparation 4.1% (n = 2), and mean recovery 106.9% (n = 5 different concentrations; n = 4 different honey matrices). Recovery for a range of different application volumes, and thus for different honey matrix loading, differed by only ≤4.2%. HMF results when calculated by use of external calibration and by use of the standard addition method varied by 8.8%. Both revealed that any matrix effect was minor and that the original matrix interference problem was successfully solved.
- 650 _2
- $a chromatografie na tenké vrstvě $x metody $7 D002855
- 650 _2
- $a kontaminace potravin $x analýza $7 D005506
- 650 _2
- $a 2-furaldehyd $x analogy a deriváty $x analýza $7 D005662
- 650 _2
- $a med $x analýza $7 D006722
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a spektrofotometrie $x metody $7 D013053
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Klingelhöfer, Ines
- 700 1_
- $a Morlock, Gertrud E
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006638 $t Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry $x 1618-2650 $g Roč. 405, č. 28 (2013), s. 9207-18
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24091734 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140704 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140707121852 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1031408 $s 862656
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 405 $c 28 $d 9207-18 $i 1618-2650 $m Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry $n Anal Bioanal Chem $x MED00006638
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140704