• Something wrong with this record ?

Fluid therapy LiDCO controlled trial-optimization of volume resuscitation of extensively burned patients through noninvasive continuous real-time hemodynamic monitoring LiDCO

M. Tokarik, F. Sjöberg, M. Balik, I. Pafcuga, L. Broz,

. 2013 ; 34 (5) : 537-542.

Language English Country United States

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NS10014 MZ0 CEP Register

This pilot trial aims at gaining support for the optimization of acute burn resuscitation through noninvasive continuous real-time hemodynamic monitoring using arterial pulse contour analysis. A group of 21 burned patients meeting preliminary criteria (age range 18-75 years with second- third- degree burns and TBSA ≥10-75%) was randomized during 2010. A hemodynamic monitoring through lithium dilution cardiac output was used in 10 randomized patients (LiDCO group), whereas those without LiDCO monitoring were defined as the control group. The modified Brooke/Parkland formula as a starting resuscitative formula, balanced crystalloids as the initial solutions, urine output of 0.5 ml/kg/hr as a crucial value of adequate intravascular filling were used in both groups. Additionally, the volume and vasopressor/inotropic support were based on dynamic preload parameters in the LiDCO group in the case of circulatory instability and oligouria. Statistical analysis was done using t-tests. Within the first 24 hours postburn, a significantly lower consumption of crystalloids was registered in LiDCO group (P = .04). The fluid balance under LiDCO control in combination with hourly diuresis contributed to reducing the cumulative fluid balance approximately by 10% compared with fluid management based on standard monitoring parameters. The amount of applied solutions in the LiDCO group got closer to Brooke formula whereas the urine output was at the same level in both groups (0.8 ml/kg/hr). The new finding in this study is that when a fluid resuscitation is based on the arterial waveform analysis, the initial fluid volume provided was significantly lower than that delivered on the basis of physician-directed fluid resuscitation (by urine output and mean arterial pressure).

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14064210
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160818104938.0
007      
ta
008      
140704s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318278197e $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23511280
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Tokarik, Monika $u From the *Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague Burn Center, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic; †Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Sweden; ‡Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Fluid therapy LiDCO controlled trial-optimization of volume resuscitation of extensively burned patients through noninvasive continuous real-time hemodynamic monitoring LiDCO / $c M. Tokarik, F. Sjöberg, M. Balik, I. Pafcuga, L. Broz,
520    9_
$a This pilot trial aims at gaining support for the optimization of acute burn resuscitation through noninvasive continuous real-time hemodynamic monitoring using arterial pulse contour analysis. A group of 21 burned patients meeting preliminary criteria (age range 18-75 years with second- third- degree burns and TBSA ≥10-75%) was randomized during 2010. A hemodynamic monitoring through lithium dilution cardiac output was used in 10 randomized patients (LiDCO group), whereas those without LiDCO monitoring were defined as the control group. The modified Brooke/Parkland formula as a starting resuscitative formula, balanced crystalloids as the initial solutions, urine output of 0.5 ml/kg/hr as a crucial value of adequate intravascular filling were used in both groups. Additionally, the volume and vasopressor/inotropic support were based on dynamic preload parameters in the LiDCO group in the case of circulatory instability and oligouria. Statistical analysis was done using t-tests. Within the first 24 hours postburn, a significantly lower consumption of crystalloids was registered in LiDCO group (P = .04). The fluid balance under LiDCO control in combination with hourly diuresis contributed to reducing the cumulative fluid balance approximately by 10% compared with fluid management based on standard monitoring parameters. The amount of applied solutions in the LiDCO group got closer to Brooke formula whereas the urine output was at the same level in both groups (0.8 ml/kg/hr). The new finding in this study is that when a fluid resuscitation is based on the arterial waveform analysis, the initial fluid volume provided was significantly lower than that delivered on the basis of physician-directed fluid resuscitation (by urine output and mean arterial pressure).
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a popálení $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x terapie $7 D002056
650    _2
$a minutový srdeční výdej $x fyziologie $7 D002302
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a tekutinová terapie $x metody $7 D005440
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a hemodynamika $x fyziologie $7 D006439
650    _2
$a mortalita v nemocnicích $x trendy $7 D017052
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a skóre závažnosti úrazu $7 D015601
650    _2
$a isotonické roztoky $x farmakologie $7 D007552
650    _2
$a lithium $x diagnostické užití $7 D008094
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a monitorování fyziologických funkcí $x metody $7 D008991
650    _2
$a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a referenční hodnoty $7 D012016
650    _2
$a resuscitace $x metody $x mortalita $7 D012151
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    _2
$a šok $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x terapie $7 D012769
650    _2
$a míra přežití $7 D015996
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Sjöberg, Folke
700    1_
$a Balik, Martin
700    1_
$a Pafcuga, Igor
700    1_
$a Broz, Ludomir
773    0_
$w MED00155237 $t Journal of burn care & research official publication of the American Burn Association $x 1559-0488 $g Roč. 34, č. 5 (2013), s. 537-542
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23511280 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140704 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160818105228 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1031694 $s 862942
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 34 $c 5 $d 537-542 $i 1559-0488 $m Journal of burn care & research $n J Burn Care Res $x MED00155237
GRA    __
$a NS10014 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140704

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...