-
Something wrong with this record ?
What is the appropriate approach in sex determination of hyoid bones
P. Urbanová, P. Hejna, L. Zátopková, M. Šafr,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Analysis of Variance MeSH
- Discriminant Analysis MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Linear Models MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Multivariate Analysis MeSH
- Observer Variation MeSH
- Hyoid Bone anatomy & histology MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Software MeSH
- Forensic Anthropology MeSH
- Sex Determination by Skeleton methods MeSH
- Imaging, Three-Dimensional MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
The hyoid bone is characterized by sexually dimorphic features, enabling it to occasionally be used in the sex determination aspect of establishing the biological profile in skeletal remains. Based on a sample of 298 fused and non-fused hyoid bones, the present paper compares several methodological approaches to sexing human hyoid bones in order to test the legitimacy of osteometrics-based linear discriminant equations and to explore the potentials of symbolic regression and methods of geometric morphometrics. In addition, two sets of published predictive models, one of which originated in an indigenous population, were validated on the studied sample. The results showed that the hyoid shape itself is a moderate sex predictor and a combination of linear measurements is a better representation of sex-related differences. The symbolic regression was shown to exceed the predictive powers of linear discriminant function analysis when two models based on a logistic and step regression reached 96% of correctly classified cases. There was a positive correlation between discriminant scores and an individual's age as the sex assessment was highly skewed in favour of males. This suggests that the human hyoid undergoes age-related modifications which facilitates determination of male bones and complicates determination of females in older individuals. The validation of discriminant equations by Komenda and Černý (1990) and Kindschud et al. (2010) revealed that there are marked inter-population and inter-sample differences which lessened the power to correctly determine female hyoid bones.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14074513
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20141008101050.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 141006s2013 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.08.010 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24237807
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Urbanová, Petra $u Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: urbanova@sci.muni.cz.
- 245 10
- $a What is the appropriate approach in sex determination of hyoid bones / $c P. Urbanová, P. Hejna, L. Zátopková, M. Šafr,
- 520 9_
- $a The hyoid bone is characterized by sexually dimorphic features, enabling it to occasionally be used in the sex determination aspect of establishing the biological profile in skeletal remains. Based on a sample of 298 fused and non-fused hyoid bones, the present paper compares several methodological approaches to sexing human hyoid bones in order to test the legitimacy of osteometrics-based linear discriminant equations and to explore the potentials of symbolic regression and methods of geometric morphometrics. In addition, two sets of published predictive models, one of which originated in an indigenous population, were validated on the studied sample. The results showed that the hyoid shape itself is a moderate sex predictor and a combination of linear measurements is a better representation of sex-related differences. The symbolic regression was shown to exceed the predictive powers of linear discriminant function analysis when two models based on a logistic and step regression reached 96% of correctly classified cases. There was a positive correlation between discriminant scores and an individual's age as the sex assessment was highly skewed in favour of males. This suggests that the human hyoid undergoes age-related modifications which facilitates determination of male bones and complicates determination of females in older individuals. The validation of discriminant equations by Komenda and Černý (1990) and Kindschud et al. (2010) revealed that there are marked inter-population and inter-sample differences which lessened the power to correctly determine female hyoid bones.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a analýza rozptylu $7 D000704
- 650 _2
- $a diskriminační analýza $7 D016002
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a soudní antropologie $7 D018732
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a os hyoideum $x anatomie a histologie $7 D006928
- 650 _2
- $a zobrazování trojrozměrné $7 D021621
- 650 _2
- $a lineární modely $7 D016014
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a multivariační analýza $7 D015999
- 650 _2
- $a odchylka pozorovatele $7 D015588
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a určení pohlaví podle kostry $x metody $7 D054881
- 650 _2
- $a software $7 D012984
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Hejna, Petr
- 700 1_
- $a Zátopková, Lenka
- 700 1_
- $a Šafr, Miroslav
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166849 $t Journal of forensic and legal medicine $x 1878-7487 $g Roč. 20, č. 8 (2013), s. 996-1003
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24237807 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20141006 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20141008101439 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1042396 $s 873425
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 20 $c 8 $d 996-1003 $i 1878-7487 $m Journal of forensic and legal medicine $n J Forensic Leg Med $x MED00166849
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20141006