-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study 'Prague 19'
V. Kočka, M. Malý, P. Toušek, T. Buděšínský, L. Lisa, P. Prodanov, J. Jarkovský, P. Widimský,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky kontrolované, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1996 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1996-01-01
PubMed
24419808
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/eht545
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- infarkt myokardu terapie MeSH
- inhibitory agregace trombocytů aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- koronární angiografie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- optická koherentní tomografie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stenty uvolňující léky * MeSH
- studie proveditelnosti MeSH
- tkáňové podpůrné struktury * MeSH
- vstřebatelné implantáty MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky kontrolované MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
AIMS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have been studied in chronic coronary artery disease, but not in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This prospective multicentre study analysed the feasibility and safety of BVS implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) in STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation became the default strategy for all consecutive STEMI patients between 15 December 2012 and 30 August 2013. A total of 142 patients underwent p-PCI; 41 of them (28.9%) fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria for BVS implantation. The BVS device success was 98%, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow was restored in 95% of patients, and acute scaffold recoil was 9.7%. An optical coherence tomography (OCT) substudy (21 patients) demonstrated excellent procedural results with only a 1.1% rate of scaffold strut malapposition. Edge dissections were present in a 38% of patients, but were small and clinically silent. Reference vessel diameter measured by quantitative coronary angiography was significantly lower than that measured by OCT by 0.29 (±0.56) mm, P = 0.028. Clinical outcomes were compared between BVS group and Control group; the latter was formed by patients who had implanted metallic stent and were in Killip Class I or II. Combined clinical endpoint was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Event-free survival was the same in both groups; 95% for BVS and 93% for Control group, P = 0.674. CONCLUSION: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute STEMI is feasible and safe. The procedural results evaluated by angiography and OCT are excellent. The early clinical results are encouraging.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15008403
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20150324112805.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150306s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/eurheartj/eht545 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24419808
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kočka, Viktor $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 60, 100 34 Prague 10, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study 'Prague 19' / $c V. Kočka, M. Malý, P. Toušek, T. Buděšínský, L. Lisa, P. Prodanov, J. Jarkovský, P. Widimský,
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have been studied in chronic coronary artery disease, but not in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This prospective multicentre study analysed the feasibility and safety of BVS implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) in STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation became the default strategy for all consecutive STEMI patients between 15 December 2012 and 30 August 2013. A total of 142 patients underwent p-PCI; 41 of them (28.9%) fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria for BVS implantation. The BVS device success was 98%, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow was restored in 95% of patients, and acute scaffold recoil was 9.7%. An optical coherence tomography (OCT) substudy (21 patients) demonstrated excellent procedural results with only a 1.1% rate of scaffold strut malapposition. Edge dissections were present in a 38% of patients, but were small and clinically silent. Reference vessel diameter measured by quantitative coronary angiography was significantly lower than that measured by OCT by 0.29 (±0.56) mm, P = 0.028. Clinical outcomes were compared between BVS group and Control group; the latter was formed by patients who had implanted metallic stent and were in Killip Class I or II. Combined clinical endpoint was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Event-free survival was the same in both groups; 95% for BVS and 93% for Control group, P = 0.674. CONCLUSION: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute STEMI is feasible and safe. The procedural results evaluated by angiography and OCT are excellent. The early clinical results are encouraging.
- 650 _2
- $a vstřebatelné implantáty $7 D020341
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a koronární angiografie $7 D017023
- 650 12
- $a stenty uvolňující léky $7 D054855
- 650 _2
- $a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a infarkt myokardu $x terapie $7 D009203
- 650 _2
- $a inhibitory agregace trombocytů $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D010975
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 12
- $a tkáňové podpůrné struktury $7 D054457
- 650 _2
- $a optická koherentní tomografie $7 D041623
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky kontrolované $7 D018848
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Malý, Martin
- 700 1_
- $a Toušek, Petr
- 700 1_
- $a Buděšínský, Tomas
- 700 1_
- $a Lisa, Libor
- 700 1_
- $a Prodanov, Petko
- 700 1_
- $a Jarkovský, Jiri
- 700 1_
- $a Widimský, Petr
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009622 $t European heart journal $x 1522-9645 $g Roč. 35, č. 12 (2014), s. 787-94
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24419808 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150306 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20150324113052 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1065676 $s 891203
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 35 $c 12 $d 787-94 $i 1522-9645 $m European heart journal $n Eur Heart J $x MED00009622
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150306