Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study 'Prague 19'

V. Kočka, M. Malý, P. Toušek, T. Buděšínský, L. Lisa, P. Prodanov, J. Jarkovský, P. Widimský,

. 2014 ; 35 (12) : 787-94.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

AIMS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have been studied in chronic coronary artery disease, but not in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This prospective multicentre study analysed the feasibility and safety of BVS implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) in STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation became the default strategy for all consecutive STEMI patients between 15 December 2012 and 30 August 2013. A total of 142 patients underwent p-PCI; 41 of them (28.9%) fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria for BVS implantation. The BVS device success was 98%, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow was restored in 95% of patients, and acute scaffold recoil was 9.7%. An optical coherence tomography (OCT) substudy (21 patients) demonstrated excellent procedural results with only a 1.1% rate of scaffold strut malapposition. Edge dissections were present in a 38% of patients, but were small and clinically silent. Reference vessel diameter measured by quantitative coronary angiography was significantly lower than that measured by OCT by 0.29 (±0.56) mm, P = 0.028. Clinical outcomes were compared between BVS group and Control group; the latter was formed by patients who had implanted metallic stent and were in Killip Class I or II. Combined clinical endpoint was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Event-free survival was the same in both groups; 95% for BVS and 93% for Control group, P = 0.674. CONCLUSION: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute STEMI is feasible and safe. The procedural results evaluated by angiography and OCT are excellent. The early clinical results are encouraging.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15008403
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150324112805.0
007      
ta
008      
150306s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/eurheartj/eht545 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24419808
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Kočka, Viktor $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 60, 100 34 Prague 10, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study 'Prague 19' / $c V. Kočka, M. Malý, P. Toušek, T. Buděšínský, L. Lisa, P. Prodanov, J. Jarkovský, P. Widimský,
520    9_
$a AIMS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have been studied in chronic coronary artery disease, but not in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This prospective multicentre study analysed the feasibility and safety of BVS implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) in STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation became the default strategy for all consecutive STEMI patients between 15 December 2012 and 30 August 2013. A total of 142 patients underwent p-PCI; 41 of them (28.9%) fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria for BVS implantation. The BVS device success was 98%, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow was restored in 95% of patients, and acute scaffold recoil was 9.7%. An optical coherence tomography (OCT) substudy (21 patients) demonstrated excellent procedural results with only a 1.1% rate of scaffold strut malapposition. Edge dissections were present in a 38% of patients, but were small and clinically silent. Reference vessel diameter measured by quantitative coronary angiography was significantly lower than that measured by OCT by 0.29 (±0.56) mm, P = 0.028. Clinical outcomes were compared between BVS group and Control group; the latter was formed by patients who had implanted metallic stent and were in Killip Class I or II. Combined clinical endpoint was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Event-free survival was the same in both groups; 95% for BVS and 93% for Control group, P = 0.674. CONCLUSION: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute STEMI is feasible and safe. The procedural results evaluated by angiography and OCT are excellent. The early clinical results are encouraging.
650    _2
$a vstřebatelné implantáty $7 D020341
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a koronární angiografie $7 D017023
650    12
$a stenty uvolňující léky $7 D054855
650    _2
$a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a infarkt myokardu $x terapie $7 D009203
650    _2
$a inhibitory agregace trombocytů $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D010975
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    12
$a tkáňové podpůrné struktury $7 D054457
650    _2
$a optická koherentní tomografie $7 D041623
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky kontrolované $7 D018848
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Malý, Martin
700    1_
$a Toušek, Petr
700    1_
$a Buděšínský, Tomas
700    1_
$a Lisa, Libor
700    1_
$a Prodanov, Petko
700    1_
$a Jarkovský, Jiri
700    1_
$a Widimský, Petr
773    0_
$w MED00009622 $t European heart journal $x 1522-9645 $g Roč. 35, č. 12 (2014), s. 787-94
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24419808 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150306 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150324113052 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1065676 $s 891203
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 35 $c 12 $d 787-94 $i 1522-9645 $m European heart journal $n Eur Heart J $x MED00009622
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150306

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...