Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Real-time use of instantaneous wave-free ratio: results of the ADVISE in-practice: an international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice

R. Petraco, R. Al-Lamee, M. Gotberg, A. Sharp, F. Hellig, SS. Nijjer, M. Echavarria-Pinto, TP. van de Hoef, S. Sen, N. Tanaka, E. Van Belle, W. Bojara, K. Sakoda, M. Mates, C. Indolfi, S. De Rosa, CJ. Vrints, S. Haine, H. Yokoi, FL. Ribichini, M....

. 2014 ; 168 (5) : 739-48.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15013980
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2002-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2002-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2002-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health Management Database (ProQuest) od 2002-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 2002-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the first experience of real-time instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurement by clinicians. BACKGROUND: The iFR is a new vasodilator-free index of coronary stenosis severity, calculated as a trans-lesion pressure ratio during a specific period of baseline diastole, when distal resistance is lowest and stable. Because all previous studies have calculated iFR offline, the feasibility of real-time iFR measurement has never been assessed. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-two stenoses with angiographically intermediate stenoses were included in this multicenter international analysis. Instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were performed in real time on commercially available consoles. The classification agreement of coronary stenoses between iFR and FFR was calculated. RESULTS: Instantaneous wave-free ratio and FFR maintain a close level of diagnostic agreement when both are measured by clinicians in real time (for a clinical 0.80 FFR cutoff: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC(AUC)] 0.87, classification match 80%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.90; for a ischemic 0.75 FFR cutoff: iFR ROC(AUC) 0.90, classification match 88%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.85; if the FFR 0.75-0.80 gray zone is accounted for: ROC(AUC) 0.93, classification match 92%). When iFR and FFR are evaluated together in a hybrid decision-making strategy, 61% of the population is spared from vasodilator while maintaining a 94% overall agreement with FFR lesion classification. CONCLUSION: When measured in real time, iFR maintains the close relationship to FFR reported in offline studies. These findings confirm the feasibility and reliability of real-time iFR calculation by clinicians.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15013980
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150423105357.0
007      
ta
008      
150420s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.022 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25440803
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Petraco, Ricardo $u International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
245    10
$a Real-time use of instantaneous wave-free ratio: results of the ADVISE in-practice: an international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice / $c R. Petraco, R. Al-Lamee, M. Gotberg, A. Sharp, F. Hellig, SS. Nijjer, M. Echavarria-Pinto, TP. van de Hoef, S. Sen, N. Tanaka, E. Van Belle, W. Bojara, K. Sakoda, M. Mates, C. Indolfi, S. De Rosa, CJ. Vrints, S. Haine, H. Yokoi, FL. Ribichini, M. Meuwissen, H. Matsuo, L. Janssens, U. Katsumi, C. Di Mario, J. Escaned, J. Piek, JE. Davies,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the first experience of real-time instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurement by clinicians. BACKGROUND: The iFR is a new vasodilator-free index of coronary stenosis severity, calculated as a trans-lesion pressure ratio during a specific period of baseline diastole, when distal resistance is lowest and stable. Because all previous studies have calculated iFR offline, the feasibility of real-time iFR measurement has never been assessed. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-two stenoses with angiographically intermediate stenoses were included in this multicenter international analysis. Instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were performed in real time on commercially available consoles. The classification agreement of coronary stenoses between iFR and FFR was calculated. RESULTS: Instantaneous wave-free ratio and FFR maintain a close level of diagnostic agreement when both are measured by clinicians in real time (for a clinical 0.80 FFR cutoff: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC(AUC)] 0.87, classification match 80%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.90; for a ischemic 0.75 FFR cutoff: iFR ROC(AUC) 0.90, classification match 88%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.85; if the FFR 0.75-0.80 gray zone is accounted for: ROC(AUC) 0.93, classification match 92%). When iFR and FFR are evaluated together in a hybrid decision-making strategy, 61% of the population is spared from vasodilator while maintaining a 94% overall agreement with FFR lesion classification. CONCLUSION: When measured in real time, iFR maintains the close relationship to FFR reported in offline studies. These findings confirm the feasibility and reliability of real-time iFR calculation by clinicians.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a plocha pod křivkou $7 D019540
650    _2
$a srdeční katetrizace $x metody $7 D006328
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a koronární angiografie $x metody $7 D017023
650    12
$a koronární cirkulace $7 D003326
650    _2
$a koronární stenóza $x diagnóza $7 D023921
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a frakční průtoková rezerva myokardu $7 D053805
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a ROC křivka $7 D012372
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Al-Lamee, Rasha $u International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom. $7 gn_A_00004390
700    1_
$a Gotberg, Matthias $u Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Sharp, Andrew $u Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Hellig, Farrel $u Sunninghill & Sunward Park Hospitals, Johannesburg, South Africa.
700    1_
$a Nijjer, Sukhjinder S $u International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Echavarria-Pinto, Mauro $u Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a van de Hoef, Tim P $u Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Sen, Sayan $u International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Tanaka, Nobuhiro $u Tokyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
700    1_
$a Van Belle, Eric $u Hôpital cardiologique CHRU Lille, Lille, France.
700    1_
$a Bojara, Waldemar $u Koblenz-Mayen Hospital, Koblenz, Germany.
700    1_
$a Sakoda, Kunihiro $u St Luke's international hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
700    1_
$a Mates, Martin $u Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Indolfi, Ciro $u University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
700    1_
$a De Rosa, Salvatore $u University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
700    1_
$a Vrints, Christian J $u Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Haine, Steven $u Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Yokoi, Hiroyoshi $u Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.
700    1_
$a Ribichini, Flavio L $u Università di Verona, Verona, Italy.
700    1_
$a Meuwissen, Martjin $u Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Matsuo, Hitoshi $u Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan.
700    1_
$a Janssens, Luc $u Imelda Hospital Bonheiden, Antwerp, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Katsumi, Ueno $u Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan.
700    1_
$a Di Mario, Carlo $u Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Escaned, Javier $u Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a Piek, Jan $u Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Davies, Justin E $u International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: justin.davies@imperial.ac.uk.
773    0_
$w MED00000228 $t American heart journal $x 1097-6744 $g Roč. 168, č. 5 (2014), s. 739-48
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25440803 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150423105656 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1071561 $s 896858
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 168 $c 5 $d 739-48 $i 1097-6744 $m The American heart journal $n Am Heart J $x MED00000228
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150420

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...