-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Randomized clinical trial comparing neurological outcomes after carotid endarterectomy or stenting
M. Kuliha, M. Roubec, V. Procházka, T. Jonszta, T. Hrbáč, J. Havelka, A. Goldírová, K. Langová, R. Herzig, D. Školoudík,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
NT11386
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
NT13498
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
PubMed
25511816
DOI
10.1002/bjs.9677
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- karotická endarterektomie metody MeSH
- kognitivní poruchy etiologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční angiografie MeSH
- mozkový infarkt patologie chirurgie MeSH
- neurologické vyšetření MeSH
- neuropsychologické testy MeSH
- pooperační komplikace etiologie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- stenóza arteria carotis patologie chirurgie MeSH
- stenty * MeSH
- tranzitorní ischemická ataka etiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Silent infarction in the brain can be detected in around 34 per cent of patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and 54 per cent after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). This study compared the risk of new infarctions in the brain in patients undergoing CEA or CAS. METHODS: Consecutive patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis exceeding 70 per cent were screened for inclusion in this prospective study. Patients with indications for intervention, and eligible for both methods, were allocated randomly to CEA or CAS. Neurological examination, cognitive function tests and MRI of the brain were undertaken before and 24 h after intervention. RESULTS: Of 150 randomized patients, 73 (47 men; mean age 64·9(7·1) years) underwent CEA and 77 (58 men; 66·4(7·5) years) had CAS. New infarctions on MRI were found more frequently after CAS (49 versus 25 per cent; P = 0·002). Lesion volume was also significantly greater after CAS (P = 0·010). Multiple logistic regression analyses identified intervention in the right ICA as the only independent predictor of brain infarction (odds ratio 2·10, 95 per cent c.i. 1·03 to 4·25; P = 0·040). Stroke or transient ischaemic attack occurred in one patient after CEA and in two after CAS. No significant differences were found in cognitive test results between the groups. CONCLUSION: These data confirm a higher risk of silent infarction in the brain on MRI after CAS in comparison with CEA, but without measurable change in cognitive function. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01591005 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15022897
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240131091049.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150709s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/bjs.9677 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25511816
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kuliha, Martin $u Departments of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic. $7 xx0313290
- 245 10
- $a Randomized clinical trial comparing neurological outcomes after carotid endarterectomy or stenting / $c M. Kuliha, M. Roubec, V. Procházka, T. Jonszta, T. Hrbáč, J. Havelka, A. Goldírová, K. Langová, R. Herzig, D. Školoudík,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Silent infarction in the brain can be detected in around 34 per cent of patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and 54 per cent after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). This study compared the risk of new infarctions in the brain in patients undergoing CEA or CAS. METHODS: Consecutive patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis exceeding 70 per cent were screened for inclusion in this prospective study. Patients with indications for intervention, and eligible for both methods, were allocated randomly to CEA or CAS. Neurological examination, cognitive function tests and MRI of the brain were undertaken before and 24 h after intervention. RESULTS: Of 150 randomized patients, 73 (47 men; mean age 64·9(7·1) years) underwent CEA and 77 (58 men; 66·4(7·5) years) had CAS. New infarctions on MRI were found more frequently after CAS (49 versus 25 per cent; P = 0·002). Lesion volume was also significantly greater after CAS (P = 0·010). Multiple logistic regression analyses identified intervention in the right ICA as the only independent predictor of brain infarction (odds ratio 2·10, 95 per cent c.i. 1·03 to 4·25; P = 0·040). Stroke or transient ischaemic attack occurred in one patient after CEA and in two after CAS. No significant differences were found in cognitive test results between the groups. CONCLUSION: These data confirm a higher risk of silent infarction in the brain on MRI after CAS in comparison with CEA, but without measurable change in cognitive function. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01591005 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
- 650 _2
- $a mozkový infarkt $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D020520
- 650 _2
- $a stenóza arteria carotis $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D016893
- 650 _2
- $a kognitivní poruchy $x etiologie $7 D003072
- 650 _2
- $a karotická endarterektomie $x metody $7 D016894
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a tranzitorní ischemická ataka $x etiologie $7 D002546
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční angiografie $7 D018810
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a neurologické vyšetření $7 D009460
- 650 _2
- $a neuropsychologické testy $7 D009483
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x etiologie $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a recidiva $7 D012008
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 12
- $a stenty $7 D015607
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Roubec, Martin $7 xx0231427
- 700 1_
- $a Procházka, Václav, $d 1961- $7 xx0070646
- 700 1_
- $a Jonszta, Tomáš $7 xx0130700
- 700 1_
- $a Hrbáč, Tomáš $7 xx0076914
- 700 1_
- $a Havelka, Jaroslav $7 xx0231394
- 700 1_
- $a Goldírová, A. $7 _AN083702
- 700 1_
- $a Langová, Kateřina $7 xx0141371
- 700 1_
- $a Herzig, Roman, $d 1968- $7 mzk2007411122
- 700 1_
- $a Školoudík, David, $d 1972- $7 xx0020614
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009388 $t British journal of surgery $x 1365-2168 $g Roč. 102, č. 3 (2015), s. 194-201
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25511816 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240131091045 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1083236 $s 905890
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 102 $c 3 $d 194-201 $i 1365-2168 $m British journal of surgery $n Br J Surg $x MED00009388
- GRA __
- $a NT11386 $p MZ0
- GRA __
- $a NT13498 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150709