Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Distal and proximal colon cancers differ in terms of molecular, pathological, and clinical features

E. Missiaglia, B. Jacobs, G. D'Ario, AF. Di Narzo, C. Soneson, E. Budinska, V. Popovici, L. Vecchione, S. Gerster, P. Yan, AD. Roth, D. Klingbiel, FT. Bosman, M. Delorenzi, S. Tejpar,

. 2014 ; 25 (10) : 1995-2001.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Differences exist between the proximal and distal colon in terms of developmental origin, exposure to patterning genes, environmental mutagens, and gut flora. Little is known on how these differences may affect mechanisms of tumorigenesis, side-specific therapy response or prognosis. We explored systematic differences in pathway activation and their clinical implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detailed clinicopathological data for 3045 colon carcinoma patients enrolled in the PETACC3 adjuvant chemotherapy trial were available for analysis. A subset of 1404 samples had molecular data, including gene expression and DNA copy number profiles for 589 and 199 samples, respectively. In addition, 413 colon adenocarcinoma from TCGA collection were also analyzed. Tumor side-effect on anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy was assessed in a cohort of 325 metastatic patients. Outcome variables considered were relapse-free survival and survival after relapse (SAR). RESULTS: Proximal carcinomas were more often mucinous, microsatellite instable (MSI)-high, mutated in key tumorigenic pathways, expressed a B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF)-like and a serrated pathway signature, regardless of histological type. Distal carcinomas were more often chromosome instable and EGFR or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplified, and more frequently overexpressed epiregulin. While risk of relapse was not different per side, SAR was much poorer for proximal than for distal stage III carcinomas in a multivariable model including BRAF mutation status [N = 285; HR 1.95, 95% CI (1.6-2.4), P < 0.001]. Only patients with metastases from a distal carcinoma responded to anti-EGFR therapy, in line with the predictions of our pathway enrichment analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal carcinoma side is associated with differences in key molecular features, some immediately druggable, with important prognostic effects which are maintained in metastatic lesions. Although within side significant molecular heterogeneity remains, our findings justify stratification of patients by side for retrospective and prospective analyses of drug efficacy and prognosis.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15023217
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170510074309.0
007      
ta
008      
150709s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/annonc/mdu275 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25057166
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Missiaglia, E $u SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
245    10
$a Distal and proximal colon cancers differ in terms of molecular, pathological, and clinical features / $c E. Missiaglia, B. Jacobs, G. D'Ario, AF. Di Narzo, C. Soneson, E. Budinska, V. Popovici, L. Vecchione, S. Gerster, P. Yan, AD. Roth, D. Klingbiel, FT. Bosman, M. Delorenzi, S. Tejpar,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Differences exist between the proximal and distal colon in terms of developmental origin, exposure to patterning genes, environmental mutagens, and gut flora. Little is known on how these differences may affect mechanisms of tumorigenesis, side-specific therapy response or prognosis. We explored systematic differences in pathway activation and their clinical implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detailed clinicopathological data for 3045 colon carcinoma patients enrolled in the PETACC3 adjuvant chemotherapy trial were available for analysis. A subset of 1404 samples had molecular data, including gene expression and DNA copy number profiles for 589 and 199 samples, respectively. In addition, 413 colon adenocarcinoma from TCGA collection were also analyzed. Tumor side-effect on anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy was assessed in a cohort of 325 metastatic patients. Outcome variables considered were relapse-free survival and survival after relapse (SAR). RESULTS: Proximal carcinomas were more often mucinous, microsatellite instable (MSI)-high, mutated in key tumorigenic pathways, expressed a B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF)-like and a serrated pathway signature, regardless of histological type. Distal carcinomas were more often chromosome instable and EGFR or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplified, and more frequently overexpressed epiregulin. While risk of relapse was not different per side, SAR was much poorer for proximal than for distal stage III carcinomas in a multivariable model including BRAF mutation status [N = 285; HR 1.95, 95% CI (1.6-2.4), P < 0.001]. Only patients with metastases from a distal carcinoma responded to anti-EGFR therapy, in line with the predictions of our pathway enrichment analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal carcinoma side is associated with differences in key molecular features, some immediately druggable, with important prognostic effects which are maintained in metastatic lesions. Although within side significant molecular heterogeneity remains, our findings justify stratification of patients by side for retrospective and prospective analyses of drug efficacy and prognosis.
650    _2
$a nádory tračníku $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $x patologie $7 D003110
650    _2
$a variabilita počtu kopií segmentů DNA $x genetika $7 D056915
650    _2
$a přežití bez známek nemoci $7 D018572
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a regulace genové exprese u nádorů $x genetika $7 D015972
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mikrosatelitní nestabilita $7 D053842
650    _2
$a metastázy nádorů $7 D009362
650    _2
$a nádorové proteiny $x biosyntéza $x genetika $7 D009363
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $x patologie $7 D009364
650    _2
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a translační biomedicínský výzkum $7 D057170
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Jacobs, B $u Molecular Digestive Oncology Unit, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
700    1_
$a D'Ario, G $u SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Di Narzo, A F $u SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Soneson, C $u SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Budinska, E $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Popovici, Vlad $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. $7 xx0213329
700    1_
$a Vecchione, L $u Molecular Digestive Oncology Unit, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Gerster, S $u SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Yan, P $u Department of Pathology, Lausanne University, Lausanne.
700    1_
$a Roth, A D $u Oncosurgery Unit, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva.
700    1_
$a Klingbiel, D $u SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center, Bern.
700    1_
$a Bosman, F T $u Department of Pathology, Lausanne University, Lausanne.
700    1_
$a Delorenzi, M $u SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland Ludwig Center for Cancer Research Oncology Department, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Tejpar, S $u Molecular Digestive Oncology Unit, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium sabine.tejpar@uzleuven.be.
773    0_
$w MED00000432 $t Annals of oncology official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology ESMO $x 1569-8041 $g Roč. 25, č. 10 (2014), s. 1995-2001
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25057166 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170510074645 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1083555 $s 906210
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 25 $c 10 $d 1995-2001 $i 1569-8041 $m Annals of oncology $n Ann Oncol $x MED00000432
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150709

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...