-
Something wrong with this record ?
Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children (1-5 years old): a comparison with a repair using double-J stent or transanastomotic externalized stent
R. Kočvara, J. Sedláček, M. Drlík, Z. Dítě, J. Běláček, V. Fiala,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
- MeSH
- Length of Stay MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Hydronephrosis surgery MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Laparoscopy * MeSH
- Kidney Pelvis surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Ureteral Obstruction surgery MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Prosthesis Design MeSH
- Pyelonephritis prevention & control MeSH
- Stents * MeSH
- Urologic Surgical Procedures methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility of unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children to prevent pyelonephritis and second anaesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 2006-2013, 70 children (1-5 years old) underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty for high grade hydronephrosis. Unstented repair was indicated in 34 children (GroupL1), double-J stent was placed in 21 patients (Group L2) and uretero-pyelostomy stent (Cook) in 15 patients (Group L3). Stenting was preferred in large thin-walled pelvis, thin ureter, kidney malrotation, and unfavourable course of crossing vessels. The outcome was compared with age-matched group of 52 children who had open surgery during 1996-2006 (Groups O1, O3). RESULTS: Operation times were significantly shorter in Groups L1 and L2 than in Group L3; the times were shorter in open repairs. Three patients with crossing vessels from Group L1 had urine leakage and one had obstruction (11.4%). In Group L2, one patient had obstruction, one incorrect placement of the stent, and one girl had serious pyelonephritis (14.3%). In Group L3, displacement of uretero-pyelostomy occurred in one patient (6.7%). There is no statistical difference between laparoscopic groups and between laparoscopic and open groups. CONCLUSION: Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a safe procedure in selected young children with favourable anatomical conditions preventing additional anaesthesia and stent-related complications.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15031985
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20151013122130.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 151005s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.04.017 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24957464
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kočvara, Radim $u Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital in Praha and Charles University 1st Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic. Electronic address: radim.kocvara@lf1.cuni.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children (1-5 years old): a comparison with a repair using double-J stent or transanastomotic externalized stent / $c R. Kočvara, J. Sedláček, M. Drlík, Z. Dítě, J. Běláček, V. Fiala,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility of unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children to prevent pyelonephritis and second anaesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 2006-2013, 70 children (1-5 years old) underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty for high grade hydronephrosis. Unstented repair was indicated in 34 children (GroupL1), double-J stent was placed in 21 patients (Group L2) and uretero-pyelostomy stent (Cook) in 15 patients (Group L3). Stenting was preferred in large thin-walled pelvis, thin ureter, kidney malrotation, and unfavourable course of crossing vessels. The outcome was compared with age-matched group of 52 children who had open surgery during 1996-2006 (Groups O1, O3). RESULTS: Operation times were significantly shorter in Groups L1 and L2 than in Group L3; the times were shorter in open repairs. Three patients with crossing vessels from Group L1 had urine leakage and one had obstruction (11.4%). In Group L2, one patient had obstruction, one incorrect placement of the stent, and one girl had serious pyelonephritis (14.3%). In Group L3, displacement of uretero-pyelostomy occurred in one patient (6.7%). There is no statistical difference between laparoscopic groups and between laparoscopic and open groups. CONCLUSION: Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a safe procedure in selected young children with favourable anatomical conditions preventing additional anaesthesia and stent-related complications.
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hydronefróza $x chirurgie $7 D006869
- 650 _2
- $a kojenec $7 D007223
- 650 _2
- $a ledvinná pánvička $x chirurgie $7 D007682
- 650 12
- $a laparoskopie $7 D010535
- 650 _2
- $a délka pobytu $7 D007902
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a protézy - design $7 D011474
- 650 _2
- $a pyelonefritida $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011704
- 650 12
- $a stenty $7 D015607
- 650 _2
- $a obstrukce močovodu $x chirurgie $7 D014517
- 650 _2
- $a urologické chirurgické výkony $x metody $7 D013520
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Sedláček, Josef $u Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital in Praha and Charles University 1st Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic. Electronic address: josef.sedlacek@vfn.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Drlík, Marcel $u Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital in Praha and Charles University 1st Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic. Electronic address: marcel.drlik@seznam.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Dítě, Zdeněk $u Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital in Praha and Charles University 1st Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic. Electronic address: ZdenekDite@seznam.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Běláček, Jaromír $u Institute of Biophysics, Charles University 1st Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital in Praha, Praha, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jaromir.belacek@lf1.cuni.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Fiala, Vojtěch $u Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital in Praha and Charles University 1st Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic. Electronic address: vojta.mail@seznam.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166989 $t Journal of pediatric urology $x 1873-4898 $g Roč. 10, č. 6 (2014), s. 1153-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24957464 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20151005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20151013122319 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1092861 $s 915111
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 10 $c 6 $d 1153-9 $e 20140606 $i 1873-4898 $m Journal of pediatric urology $n J Pediatr Urol $x MED00166989
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20151005