Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Artificially low cortical bone mineral density in Turner syndrome is due to the partial volume effect

O. Soucek, E. Schönau, J. Lebl, Z. Sumnik,

. 2015 ; 26 (3) : 1213-8. [pub] 20141007

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago

UNLABELLED: We aimed to show that the decrease in the cortical bone mineral density (BMD) in the radius in Turner syndrome (TS) is artificially caused by the partial volume effect. We confirmed that the partial volume effect-corrected cortical BMD is not decreased in TS compared to in the healthy controls. Other factors are responsible for the increased fracture rate in TS. INTRODUCTION: Decreased cortical bone mineral density (BMD) has been reported in Turner syndrome (TS), using peripheral quantitative computerised tomography, and it is perceived as one of the major factors leading to increased fracture risk. We tested the hypothesis that low cortical BMD in the radius is caused artificially by the partial volume effect. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the university hospital referral centre between March and October 2013. Thirty-two participants with TS who consented to the study were included (mean age 15.3 ± 3.2 years). We assessed the cortical BMD in the radius as well as the tibia, where the cortex is thicker compared with the radius. RESULTS: Whereas the cortical BMD was decreased in the radius (mean ± SD Z-score -0.6 ± 1.5, p = 0.037), it was increased in the tibia (mean Z-score 0.83 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). After correcting the cortical BMD for the partial volume effect, the mean Z-score was normal in the radius in TS (0.4 ± 1.3, p = 0.064). The corrected cortical BMD values were similar in the radius and tibia (1108 ± 52 vs. 1104 ± 48, group difference p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The cortical BMD is not decreased in TS. The partial volume effect is responsible for previous findings of decreased cortical BMD in the radius. Altered bone geometry or other factors rather than low cortical BMD likely play a role in the increased fracture risk in TS.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16000601
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160127094355.0
007      
ta
008      
160108s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00198-014-2901-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25288443
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Soucek, O $u Department of Pediatrics, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Praha 5, Czech Republic, ondrej.soucek@lfmotol.cuni.cz.
245    10
$a Artificially low cortical bone mineral density in Turner syndrome is due to the partial volume effect / $c O. Soucek, E. Schönau, J. Lebl, Z. Sumnik,
520    9_
$a UNLABELLED: We aimed to show that the decrease in the cortical bone mineral density (BMD) in the radius in Turner syndrome (TS) is artificially caused by the partial volume effect. We confirmed that the partial volume effect-corrected cortical BMD is not decreased in TS compared to in the healthy controls. Other factors are responsible for the increased fracture rate in TS. INTRODUCTION: Decreased cortical bone mineral density (BMD) has been reported in Turner syndrome (TS), using peripheral quantitative computerised tomography, and it is perceived as one of the major factors leading to increased fracture risk. We tested the hypothesis that low cortical BMD in the radius is caused artificially by the partial volume effect. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the university hospital referral centre between March and October 2013. Thirty-two participants with TS who consented to the study were included (mean age 15.3 ± 3.2 years). We assessed the cortical BMD in the radius as well as the tibia, where the cortex is thicker compared with the radius. RESULTS: Whereas the cortical BMD was decreased in the radius (mean ± SD Z-score -0.6 ± 1.5, p = 0.037), it was increased in the tibia (mean Z-score 0.83 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). After correcting the cortical BMD for the partial volume effect, the mean Z-score was normal in the radius in TS (0.4 ± 1.3, p = 0.064). The corrected cortical BMD values were similar in the radius and tibia (1108 ± 52 vs. 1104 ± 48, group difference p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The cortical BMD is not decreased in TS. The partial volume effect is responsible for previous findings of decreased cortical BMD in the radius. Altered bone geometry or other factors rather than low cortical BMD likely play a role in the increased fracture risk in TS.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a kostní denzita $x fyziologie $7 D015519
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a radius $x radiografie $7 D011884
650    _2
$a tibie $x radiografie $7 D013977
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
650    _2
$a Turnerův syndrom $x radiografie $7 D014424
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Schönau, E
700    1_
$a Lebl, J
700    1_
$a Sumnik, Z
773    0_
$w MED00003659 $t Osteoporosis international a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA $x 1433-2965 $g Roč. 26, č. 3 (2015), s. 1213-8
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25288443 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160127094520 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1102882 $s 924807
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 26 $c 3 $d 1213-8 $e 20141007 $i 1433-2965 $m Osteoporosis international $n Osteoporos Int $x MED00003659
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160108

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...