Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The Effect of LDL-Apheresis and Rheohaemapheresis Treatment on Vitamin E

D. Solichová, M. Bláha, J. Aufartová, LK. Krcmová, J. Plíšek, B. Honegrová, E. Kasalová, M. Lánská, L. Urbánek, L. Sobotka,

. 2015 ; 61 (2) : 105-112.

Jazyk angličtina Země Japonsko

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16010120

Grantová podpora
NT14265 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
NT14037 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
NT13475 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

Lipid apheresis (extracorporeal lipoprotein elimination) is administered to patients with familial hypercholesterolemia who fail to respond to standard therapy. The nature of the treatment process raises the suspicion that it decreases not only cholesterol but also antioxidants. A group of 12 patients (average age 47±17 y, 4 homozygous and 8 heterozygous individuals) with familial hypercholesterolemia treated by LDL-apheresis or rheohaemapheresis for 3-12 y was included in the study. In addition to cholesterol and triacylglycerol levels, vitamin E and vitamin A and also other markers of antioxidant activity were investigated. Nevertheless, the most important determined parameter was the vitamin E/cholesterol ratio in serum and lipoproteins. The results indicate that both extracorporeal elimination methods are effective and suitable ways to treat severe familial hypercholesterolemia, as the LDL fraction of cholesterol decreased by approximately 77% and 66% following LDL-apheresis and rheohaemapheresis, respectively. In addition, the serum vitamin E decreased by 54% and 57% and the decrease of the serum vitamin A was approximately 20%. However, the main marker of antioxidant capacity, vitamin E/cholesterol ratio, in the serum, VLDL and LDL significantly increased. The increase of vitamin E levels in the erythrocyte membranes of 2% following LDL-apheresis and a significant increase of 4% following rheohaemapheresis were confirmed. The presented results indicate that LDL-apheresis and rheohaemapheresis can be considered to be safe procedures according to the antioxidant capacity of the serum, VLDL and LDL lipoprotein fractions and the erythrocyte membrane.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16010120
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191126101905.0
007      
ta
008      
160408s2015 ja f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3177/jnsv.61.105 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.3177/jnsv.61.105 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26052140
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ja
100    1_
$a Solichová, Dagmar $u 3rd Internal Gerontometabolic Clinic, University Hospital Hradec Králové and Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové $7 xx0060526
245    14
$a The Effect of LDL-Apheresis and Rheohaemapheresis Treatment on Vitamin E / $c D. Solichová, M. Bláha, J. Aufartová, LK. Krcmová, J. Plíšek, B. Honegrová, E. Kasalová, M. Lánská, L. Urbánek, L. Sobotka,
520    9_
$a Lipid apheresis (extracorporeal lipoprotein elimination) is administered to patients with familial hypercholesterolemia who fail to respond to standard therapy. The nature of the treatment process raises the suspicion that it decreases not only cholesterol but also antioxidants. A group of 12 patients (average age 47±17 y, 4 homozygous and 8 heterozygous individuals) with familial hypercholesterolemia treated by LDL-apheresis or rheohaemapheresis for 3-12 y was included in the study. In addition to cholesterol and triacylglycerol levels, vitamin E and vitamin A and also other markers of antioxidant activity were investigated. Nevertheless, the most important determined parameter was the vitamin E/cholesterol ratio in serum and lipoproteins. The results indicate that both extracorporeal elimination methods are effective and suitable ways to treat severe familial hypercholesterolemia, as the LDL fraction of cholesterol decreased by approximately 77% and 66% following LDL-apheresis and rheohaemapheresis, respectively. In addition, the serum vitamin E decreased by 54% and 57% and the decrease of the serum vitamin A was approximately 20%. However, the main marker of antioxidant capacity, vitamin E/cholesterol ratio, in the serum, VLDL and LDL significantly increased. The increase of vitamin E levels in the erythrocyte membranes of 2% following LDL-apheresis and a significant increase of 4% following rheohaemapheresis were confirmed. The presented results indicate that LDL-apheresis and rheohaemapheresis can be considered to be safe procedures according to the antioxidant capacity of the serum, VLDL and LDL lipoprotein fractions and the erythrocyte membrane.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a antioxidancia $x metabolismus $7 D000975
650    _2
$a separace krevních složek $x metody $7 D001781
650    _2
$a cholesterol $x krev $7 D002784
650    _2
$a LDL-cholesterol $x krev $7 D008078
650    _2
$a VLDL-cholesterol $x krev $7 D015243
650    _2
$a erytrocyty $x metabolismus $7 D004912
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hyperlipoproteinemie typ II $x terapie $7 D006938
650    _2
$a lipoproteiny $x krev $7 D008074
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a triglyceridy $x krev $7 D014280
650    _2
$a vitamin A $x krev $7 D014801
650    _2
$a vitamin E $x krev $7 D014810
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bláha, Milan, $d 1938- $7 xx0034440
700    1_
$a Aufartová, Jana $7 gn_A_00009997
700    1_
$a Krčmová Kujovská, Lenka, $d 1981- $7 xx0209338
700    1_
$a Plíšek, Jiří $7 xx0171640
700    1_
$a Honegrová, Barbora $7 xx0235807
700    1_
$a Kasalová, Eva $7 xx0209611
700    1_
$a Lánská, Miriam $7 jx20100315020
700    1_
$a Urbánek, Lubor $7 xx0100212
700    1_
$a Sobotka, Luboš, $d 1952- $7 jn20001005317
773    0_
$w MED00002858 $t Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology $x 1881-7742 $g Roč. 61, č. 2 (2015), s. 105-112
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26052140 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191126102151 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1113549 $s 934488
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 61 $c 2 $d 105-112 $i 1881-7742 $m Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology $n J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) $x MED00002858
GRA    __
$a NT14265 $p MZ0
GRA    __
$a NT14037 $p MZ0
GRA    __
$a NT13475 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160408

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...