Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

In Depth Characterization of Repetitive DNA in 23 Plant Genomes Reveals Sources of Genome Size Variation in the Legume Tribe Fabeae

J. Macas, P. Novák, J. Pellicer, J. Čížková, A. Koblížková, P. Neumann, I. Fuková, J. Doležel, LJ. Kelly, IJ. Leitch,

. 2015 ; 10 (11) : e0143424. [pub] 20151125

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The differential accumulation and elimination of repetitive DNA are key drivers of genome size variation in flowering plants, yet there have been few studies which have analysed how different types of repeats in related species contribute to genome size evolution within a phylogenetic context. This question is addressed here by conducting large-scale comparative analysis of repeats in 23 species from four genera of the monophyletic legume tribe Fabeae, representing a 7.6-fold variation in genome size. Phylogenetic analysis and genome size reconstruction revealed that this diversity arose from genome size expansions and contractions in different lineages during the evolution of Fabeae. Employing a combination of low-pass genome sequencing with novel bioinformatic approaches resulted in identification and quantification of repeats making up 55-83% of the investigated genomes. In turn, this enabled an analysis of how each major repeat type contributed to the genome size variation encountered. Differential accumulation of repetitive DNA was found to account for 85% of the genome size differences between the species, and most (57%) of this variation was found to be driven by a single lineage of Ty3/gypsy LTR-retrotransposons, the Ogre elements. Although the amounts of several other lineages of LTR-retrotransposons and the total amount of satellite DNA were also positively correlated with genome size, their contributions to genome size variation were much smaller (up to 6%). Repeat analysis within a phylogenetic framework also revealed profound differences in the extent of sequence conservation between different repeat types across Fabeae. In addition to these findings, the study has provided a proof of concept for the approach combining recent developments in sequencing and bioinformatics to perform comparative analyses of repetitive DNAs in a large number of non-model species without the need to assemble their genomes.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16020119
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160722115936.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0143424 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0143424 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26606051
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Macas, Jiří $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a In Depth Characterization of Repetitive DNA in 23 Plant Genomes Reveals Sources of Genome Size Variation in the Legume Tribe Fabeae / $c J. Macas, P. Novák, J. Pellicer, J. Čížková, A. Koblížková, P. Neumann, I. Fuková, J. Doležel, LJ. Kelly, IJ. Leitch,
520    9_
$a The differential accumulation and elimination of repetitive DNA are key drivers of genome size variation in flowering plants, yet there have been few studies which have analysed how different types of repeats in related species contribute to genome size evolution within a phylogenetic context. This question is addressed here by conducting large-scale comparative analysis of repeats in 23 species from four genera of the monophyletic legume tribe Fabeae, representing a 7.6-fold variation in genome size. Phylogenetic analysis and genome size reconstruction revealed that this diversity arose from genome size expansions and contractions in different lineages during the evolution of Fabeae. Employing a combination of low-pass genome sequencing with novel bioinformatic approaches resulted in identification and quantification of repeats making up 55-83% of the investigated genomes. In turn, this enabled an analysis of how each major repeat type contributed to the genome size variation encountered. Differential accumulation of repetitive DNA was found to account for 85% of the genome size differences between the species, and most (57%) of this variation was found to be driven by a single lineage of Ty3/gypsy LTR-retrotransposons, the Ogre elements. Although the amounts of several other lineages of LTR-retrotransposons and the total amount of satellite DNA were also positively correlated with genome size, their contributions to genome size variation were much smaller (up to 6%). Repeat analysis within a phylogenetic framework also revealed profound differences in the extent of sequence conservation between different repeat types across Fabeae. In addition to these findings, the study has provided a proof of concept for the approach combining recent developments in sequencing and bioinformatics to perform comparative analyses of repetitive DNAs in a large number of non-model species without the need to assemble their genomes.
650    _2
$a molekulární evoluce $7 D019143
650    _2
$a Fabaceae $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D007887
650    12
$a genetická variace $7 D014644
650    12
$a délka genomu $7 D059646
650    12
$a genom rostlinný $7 D018745
650    12
$a genomika $x metody $7 D023281
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    12
$a repetitivní sekvence nukleových kyselin $7 D012091
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a sekvenční analýza DNA $7 D017422
650    _2
$a koncové repetice $7 D020079
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Novák, Petr $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pellicer, Jaume $u Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Čížková, Jana $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Koblížková, Andrea $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Neumann, Pavel $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fuková, Iva $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Doležel, Jaroslav $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kelly, Laura J $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Leitch, Ilia J $u Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 10, č. 11 (2015), s. e0143424
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26606051 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160722120150 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1154789 $s 944647
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 10 $c 11 $d e0143424 $e 20151125 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...