-
Something wrong with this record ?
Mild Neurocognitive Disorder: An Old Wine in a New Bottle
GB. Stokin, J. Krell-Roesch, RC. Petersen, YE. Geda,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
- MeSH
- Dementia classification diagnosis MeSH
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders MeSH
- Diagnosis, Differential MeSH
- Mental Health statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Geriatric Assessment methods MeSH
- Cognitive Dysfunction classification diagnosis MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neuropsychological Tests standards MeSH
- Psychiatric Status Rating Scales standards MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
The American Psychiatric Association has recently published the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). The DSM-IV category "Dementia, Delirium, Amnestic, and Other Cognitive Disorders" has undergone extensive revision. DSM-5 has renamed this category as "Neurocognitive Disorders" (NCD), which now covers three entities: delirium, major NCD, and mild NCD. The DSM-IV version of mild NCD resembles the DSM-5 version in name only. DSM-IV defined mild NCD based on a single criterion, whereas DSM-5 defines mild NCD by using several cognitive and related criteria. The main difference between mild NCD and the Key International Symposium criteria of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is that the research work that led to the construct of MCI primarily involved elderly study participants (even though age was not part of the definition of MCI), whereas mild NCD includes acquired cognitive disorders of all age groups. DSM-5 essentially discusses the epidemiology and diagnostic markers of mild NCD by drawing congruence between MCI and mild NCD. The DSM-5 definition of mild NCD is anchored on four criteria and two specifiers. The four criteria refer to cognitive changes, functional activities, and exclusion of delirium and competing mental disorders. The two specifiers are the presumed etiologies of mild NCD and the presence or absence of behavioral problems. While the category "mild NCD" may improve reliability of diagnoses, it has yet to withstand scientific scrutiny to be considered a valid construct. This article reviews the DSM-5 criteria for mild NCD, compares them with the Key International Symposium MCI criteria, and discusses the pros and cons of the mild NCD construct.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16020330
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160728095628.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160722s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000084 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000084 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26332219
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Stokin, Gorazd B $u From the International Clinical Research Center, Brno, Czech Republic (Drs. Stokin, Krell-Roesch, and Geda); Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ (Drs. Krell-Roesch and Geda); and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Dr. Petersen).
- 245 10
- $a Mild Neurocognitive Disorder: An Old Wine in a New Bottle / $c GB. Stokin, J. Krell-Roesch, RC. Petersen, YE. Geda,
- 520 9_
- $a The American Psychiatric Association has recently published the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). The DSM-IV category "Dementia, Delirium, Amnestic, and Other Cognitive Disorders" has undergone extensive revision. DSM-5 has renamed this category as "Neurocognitive Disorders" (NCD), which now covers three entities: delirium, major NCD, and mild NCD. The DSM-IV version of mild NCD resembles the DSM-5 version in name only. DSM-IV defined mild NCD based on a single criterion, whereas DSM-5 defines mild NCD by using several cognitive and related criteria. The main difference between mild NCD and the Key International Symposium criteria of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is that the research work that led to the construct of MCI primarily involved elderly study participants (even though age was not part of the definition of MCI), whereas mild NCD includes acquired cognitive disorders of all age groups. DSM-5 essentially discusses the epidemiology and diagnostic markers of mild NCD by drawing congruence between MCI and mild NCD. The DSM-5 definition of mild NCD is anchored on four criteria and two specifiers. The four criteria refer to cognitive changes, functional activities, and exclusion of delirium and competing mental disorders. The two specifiers are the presumed etiologies of mild NCD and the presence or absence of behavioral problems. While the category "mild NCD" may improve reliability of diagnoses, it has yet to withstand scientific scrutiny to be considered a valid construct. This article reviews the DSM-5 criteria for mild NCD, compares them with the Key International Symposium MCI criteria, and discusses the pros and cons of the mild NCD construct.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a demence $x klasifikace $x diagnóza $7 D003704
- 650 _2
- $a diferenciální diagnóza $7 D003937
- 650 _2
- $a Diagnostický a statistický manuál mentálních poruch $7 D039721
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a geriatrické hodnocení $x metody $7 D015577
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a duševní zdraví $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D008603
- 650 _2
- $a kognitivní dysfunkce $x klasifikace $x diagnóza $7 D060825
- 650 _2
- $a neuropsychologické testy $x normy $7 D009483
- 650 _2
- $a psychiatrické posuzovací škály $x normy $7 D011569
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural $7 D052061
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Krell-Roesch, Janina
- 700 1_
- $a Petersen, Ronald C
- 700 1_
- $a Geda, Yonas E
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007960 $t Harvard review of psychiatry $x 1465-7309 $g Roč. 23, č. 5 (2015), s. 368-76
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26332219 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160722 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160728095850 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1155000 $s 944858
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 23 $c 5 $d 368-76 $i 1465-7309 $m Harvard review of psychiatry $n Harv Rev Psychiatry $x MED00007960
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160722