-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of cosmic rays radiation detectors on-board commercial jet aircraft
J. Kubančák, I. Ambrožová, KP. Brabcová, J. Jakůbek, D. Kyselová, O. Ploc, J. Bemš, V. Štěpán, Y. Uchihori,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
25979739
DOI
10.1093/rpd/ncv331
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Absorption, Radiation MeSH
- Equipment Design MeSH
- Cosmic Radiation * MeSH
- Aircraft instrumentation MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Radiation Monitoring instrumentation MeSH
- Semiconductors MeSH
- Occupational Exposure analysis standards MeSH
- Radiation Exposure MeSH
- Solar Activity MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Aircrew members and passengers are exposed to increased rates of cosmic radiation on-board commercial jet aircraft. The annual effective doses of crew members often exceed limits for public, thus it is recommended to monitor them. In general, the doses are estimated via various computer codes and in some countries also verified by measurements. This paper describes a comparison of three cosmic rays detectors, namely of the (a) HAWK Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter; (b) Liulin semiconductor energy deposit spectrometer and (c) TIMEPIX silicon semiconductor pixel detector, exposed to radiation fields on-board commercial Czech Airlines company jet aircraft. Measurements were performed during passenger flights from Prague to Madrid, Oslo, Tbilisi, Yekaterinburg and Almaty, and back in July and August 2011. For all flights, energy deposit spectra and absorbed doses are presented. Measured absorbed dose and dose equivalent are compared with the EPCARD code calculations. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of all detectors are discussed.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16020797
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160722121415.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/rpd/ncv331 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/rpd/ncv331 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25979739
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kubančák, Ján $u Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the ASCR, Na Truhlářce 39/64, Prague 180 00, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Department of Dosimetry and Application of Ionizing Radiation, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, Prague 115 19, Czech Republic kubancak@ujf.cas.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of cosmic rays radiation detectors on-board commercial jet aircraft / $c J. Kubančák, I. Ambrožová, KP. Brabcová, J. Jakůbek, D. Kyselová, O. Ploc, J. Bemš, V. Štěpán, Y. Uchihori,
- 520 9_
- $a Aircrew members and passengers are exposed to increased rates of cosmic radiation on-board commercial jet aircraft. The annual effective doses of crew members often exceed limits for public, thus it is recommended to monitor them. In general, the doses are estimated via various computer codes and in some countries also verified by measurements. This paper describes a comparison of three cosmic rays detectors, namely of the (a) HAWK Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter; (b) Liulin semiconductor energy deposit spectrometer and (c) TIMEPIX silicon semiconductor pixel detector, exposed to radiation fields on-board commercial Czech Airlines company jet aircraft. Measurements were performed during passenger flights from Prague to Madrid, Oslo, Tbilisi, Yekaterinburg and Almaty, and back in July and August 2011. For all flights, energy deposit spectra and absorbed doses are presented. Measured absorbed dose and dose equivalent are compared with the EPCARD code calculations. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of all detectors are discussed.
- 650 _2
- $a absorpce radiace $7 D065638
- 650 _2
- $a letadla $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D000401
- 650 12
- $a kosmické záření $7 D003359
- 650 _2
- $a design vybavení $7 D004867
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a pracovní expozice $x analýza $x normy $7 D016273
- 650 _2
- $a radiační expozice $7 D000069079
- 650 _2
- $a monitorování radiace $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D011834
- 650 _2
- $a polovodiče $7 D012666
- 650 _2
- $a sluneční aktivita $7 D019445
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Ambrožová, Iva $u Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the ASCR, Na Truhlářce 39/64, Prague 180 00, Czech Republic. $7 gn_A_00005444
- 700 1_
- $a Brabcová, Kateřina Pachnerová $u Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the ASCR, Na Truhlářce 39/64, Prague 180 00, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Jakůbek, Jan $u Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Horská 3a/22, Prague 128 00, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kyselová, Dagmar $u Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Department of Dosimetry and Application of Ionizing Radiation, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, Prague 115 19, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ploc, Ondřej $u Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the ASCR, Na Truhlářce 39/64, Prague 180 00, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bemš, Július $u Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 2, Prague 160 00, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Štěpán, Václav $u Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the ASCR, Na Truhlářce 39/64, Prague 180 00, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Uchihori, Yukio $u National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba 263-855, Japan.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004029 $t Radiation protection dosimetry $x 1742-3406 $g Roč. 164, č. 4 (2015), s. 484-8
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25979739 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160722 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160722121630 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1155467 $s 945325
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 164 $c 4 $d 484-8 $e 20150515 $i 1742-3406 $m Radiation protection dosimetry $n Radiat Prot Dosimetry $x MED00004029
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160722