• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

phoP, SPI1, SPI2 and aroA mutants of Salmonella Enteritidis induce a different immune response in chickens

M. Elsheimer-Matulova, K. Varmuzova, K. Kyrova, H. Havlickova, F. Sisak, M. Rahman, I. Rychlik,

. 2015 ; 46 (-) : 96. [pub] 20150917

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16028207

Poultry is the most frequent reservoir of non-typhoid Salmonella enterica for humans. Understanding the interactions between chickens and S. enterica is therefore important for vaccine design and subsequent decrease in the incidence of human salmonellosis. In this study we therefore characterized the interactions between chickens and phoP, aroA, SPI1 and SPI2 mutants of S. Enteritidis. First we tested the response of HD11 chicken macrophage-like cell line to S. Enteritidis infection monitoring the transcription of 36 genes related to immune response. All the mutants and the wild type strain induced inflammatory signaling in the HD11 cell line though the response to SPI1 mutant infection was different from the rest of the mutants. When newly hatched chickens were inoculated, the phoP as well as the SPI1 mutant did not induce an expression of any of the tested genes in the cecum. Despite this, such chickens were protected against challenge with wild-type S. Enteritidis. On the other hand, inoculation of chickens with the aroA or SPI2 mutant induced expression of 27 and 18 genes, respectively, including genes encoding immunoglobulins. Challenge of chickens inoculated with these two mutants resulted in repeated induction of 11 and 13 tested genes, respectively, including the genes encoding immunoglobulins. In conclusion, SPI1 and phoP mutants induced protective immunity without inducing an inflammatory response and antibody production. Inoculation of chickens with the SPI2 and aroA mutants also led to protective immunity but was associated with inflammation and antibody production. The differences in interaction between the mutants and chicken host can be used for a more detailed understanding of the chicken immune system.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16028207
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20161027111429.0
007      
ta
008      
161005s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13567-015-0224-x $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13567-015-0224-x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26380970
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Elsheimer-Matulova, Marta $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. matulova@vri.cz.
245    10
$a phoP, SPI1, SPI2 and aroA mutants of Salmonella Enteritidis induce a different immune response in chickens / $c M. Elsheimer-Matulova, K. Varmuzova, K. Kyrova, H. Havlickova, F. Sisak, M. Rahman, I. Rychlik,
520    9_
$a Poultry is the most frequent reservoir of non-typhoid Salmonella enterica for humans. Understanding the interactions between chickens and S. enterica is therefore important for vaccine design and subsequent decrease in the incidence of human salmonellosis. In this study we therefore characterized the interactions between chickens and phoP, aroA, SPI1 and SPI2 mutants of S. Enteritidis. First we tested the response of HD11 chicken macrophage-like cell line to S. Enteritidis infection monitoring the transcription of 36 genes related to immune response. All the mutants and the wild type strain induced inflammatory signaling in the HD11 cell line though the response to SPI1 mutant infection was different from the rest of the mutants. When newly hatched chickens were inoculated, the phoP as well as the SPI1 mutant did not induce an expression of any of the tested genes in the cecum. Despite this, such chickens were protected against challenge with wild-type S. Enteritidis. On the other hand, inoculation of chickens with the aroA or SPI2 mutant induced expression of 27 and 18 genes, respectively, including genes encoding immunoglobulins. Challenge of chickens inoculated with these two mutants resulted in repeated induction of 11 and 13 tested genes, respectively, including the genes encoding immunoglobulins. In conclusion, SPI1 and phoP mutants induced protective immunity without inducing an inflammatory response and antibody production. Inoculation of chickens with the SPI2 and aroA mutants also led to protective immunity but was associated with inflammation and antibody production. The differences in interaction between the mutants and chicken host can be used for a more detailed understanding of the chicken immune system.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a cékum $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D002432
650    _2
$a buněčné linie $7 D002460
650    _2
$a kur domácí $7 D002645
650    _2
$a makrofágy $x imunologie $7 D008264
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mutace $7 D009154
650    _2
$a nemoci drůbeže $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D011201
650    _2
$a salmonelová infekce u zvířat $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D012481
650    _2
$a salmonelové vakcíny $x imunologie $7 D022562
650    12
$a Salmonella enteritidis $x genetika $x imunologie $7 D012477
650    _2
$a atenuované vakcíny $x imunologie $7 D014613
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Varmuzova, Karolina $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. varmuzova@vri.cz.
700    1_
$a Kyrova, Kamila $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. kyrova@vri.cz.
700    1_
$a Havlickova, Hana $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. havlickova@vri.cz.
700    1_
$a Sisak, Frantisek $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. sisak@vri.cz.
700    1_
$a Rahman, Masudur $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. rahman@vri.cz.
700    1_
$a Rychlik, Ivan $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. rychlik@vri.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00177074 $t Veterinary research $x 1297-9716 $g Roč. 46, č. - (2015), s. 96
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26380970 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20161005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20161027111846 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1166521 $s 952837
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 46 $c - $d 96 $e 20150917 $i 1297-9716 $m Veterinary research $n Vet Res $x MED00177074
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20161005

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...