-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
phoP, SPI1, SPI2 and aroA mutants of Salmonella Enteritidis induce a different immune response in chickens
M. Elsheimer-Matulova, K. Varmuzova, K. Kyrova, H. Havlickova, F. Sisak, M. Rahman, I. Rychlik,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2011-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2011
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2009
Europe PubMed Central
od 2009
ProQuest Central
od 2015-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2015-01-13
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2015-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1993
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2011-12-01
- MeSH
- atenuované vakcíny imunologie MeSH
- buněčné linie MeSH
- cékum imunologie mikrobiologie MeSH
- kur domácí MeSH
- makrofágy imunologie MeSH
- mutace MeSH
- nemoci drůbeže imunologie mikrobiologie MeSH
- Salmonella enteritidis * genetika imunologie MeSH
- salmonelová infekce u zvířat imunologie mikrobiologie MeSH
- salmonelové vakcíny imunologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Poultry is the most frequent reservoir of non-typhoid Salmonella enterica for humans. Understanding the interactions between chickens and S. enterica is therefore important for vaccine design and subsequent decrease in the incidence of human salmonellosis. In this study we therefore characterized the interactions between chickens and phoP, aroA, SPI1 and SPI2 mutants of S. Enteritidis. First we tested the response of HD11 chicken macrophage-like cell line to S. Enteritidis infection monitoring the transcription of 36 genes related to immune response. All the mutants and the wild type strain induced inflammatory signaling in the HD11 cell line though the response to SPI1 mutant infection was different from the rest of the mutants. When newly hatched chickens were inoculated, the phoP as well as the SPI1 mutant did not induce an expression of any of the tested genes in the cecum. Despite this, such chickens were protected against challenge with wild-type S. Enteritidis. On the other hand, inoculation of chickens with the aroA or SPI2 mutant induced expression of 27 and 18 genes, respectively, including genes encoding immunoglobulins. Challenge of chickens inoculated with these two mutants resulted in repeated induction of 11 and 13 tested genes, respectively, including the genes encoding immunoglobulins. In conclusion, SPI1 and phoP mutants induced protective immunity without inducing an inflammatory response and antibody production. Inoculation of chickens with the SPI2 and aroA mutants also led to protective immunity but was associated with inflammation and antibody production. The differences in interaction between the mutants and chicken host can be used for a more detailed understanding of the chicken immune system.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16028207
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20161027111429.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 161005s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s13567-015-0224-x $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s13567-015-0224-x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26380970
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Elsheimer-Matulova, Marta $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. matulova@vri.cz.
- 245 10
- $a phoP, SPI1, SPI2 and aroA mutants of Salmonella Enteritidis induce a different immune response in chickens / $c M. Elsheimer-Matulova, K. Varmuzova, K. Kyrova, H. Havlickova, F. Sisak, M. Rahman, I. Rychlik,
- 520 9_
- $a Poultry is the most frequent reservoir of non-typhoid Salmonella enterica for humans. Understanding the interactions between chickens and S. enterica is therefore important for vaccine design and subsequent decrease in the incidence of human salmonellosis. In this study we therefore characterized the interactions between chickens and phoP, aroA, SPI1 and SPI2 mutants of S. Enteritidis. First we tested the response of HD11 chicken macrophage-like cell line to S. Enteritidis infection monitoring the transcription of 36 genes related to immune response. All the mutants and the wild type strain induced inflammatory signaling in the HD11 cell line though the response to SPI1 mutant infection was different from the rest of the mutants. When newly hatched chickens were inoculated, the phoP as well as the SPI1 mutant did not induce an expression of any of the tested genes in the cecum. Despite this, such chickens were protected against challenge with wild-type S. Enteritidis. On the other hand, inoculation of chickens with the aroA or SPI2 mutant induced expression of 27 and 18 genes, respectively, including genes encoding immunoglobulins. Challenge of chickens inoculated with these two mutants resulted in repeated induction of 11 and 13 tested genes, respectively, including the genes encoding immunoglobulins. In conclusion, SPI1 and phoP mutants induced protective immunity without inducing an inflammatory response and antibody production. Inoculation of chickens with the SPI2 and aroA mutants also led to protective immunity but was associated with inflammation and antibody production. The differences in interaction between the mutants and chicken host can be used for a more detailed understanding of the chicken immune system.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a cékum $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D002432
- 650 _2
- $a buněčné linie $7 D002460
- 650 _2
- $a kur domácí $7 D002645
- 650 _2
- $a makrofágy $x imunologie $7 D008264
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a mutace $7 D009154
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci drůbeže $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D011201
- 650 _2
- $a salmonelová infekce u zvířat $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D012481
- 650 _2
- $a salmonelové vakcíny $x imunologie $7 D022562
- 650 12
- $a Salmonella enteritidis $x genetika $x imunologie $7 D012477
- 650 _2
- $a atenuované vakcíny $x imunologie $7 D014613
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Varmuzova, Karolina $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. varmuzova@vri.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Kyrova, Kamila $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. kyrova@vri.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Havlickova, Hana $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. havlickova@vri.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Sisak, Frantisek $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. sisak@vri.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Rahman, Masudur $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. rahman@vri.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Rychlik, Ivan $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. rychlik@vri.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00177074 $t Veterinary research $x 1297-9716 $g Roč. 46, č. - (2015), s. 96
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26380970 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20161005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20161027111846 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1166521 $s 952837
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 46 $c - $d 96 $e 20150917 $i 1297-9716 $m Veterinary research $n Vet Res $x MED00177074
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20161005