-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Visual evoked potentials in patients after methanol poisoning
P. Urban, S. Zakharov, P. Diblík, D. Pelclová, P. Ridzoň,
Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2002-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-01-01
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- formiáty krev MeSH
- koncentrace vodíkových iontů MeSH
- kyselina mléčná krev MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- methanol krev farmakologie otrava MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- zraková ostrost MeSH
- zrakové evokované potenciály účinky léků MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
OBJECTIVES: We report the results of the visual evoked potentials (VEP) examination in patients after severe poisoning by methanol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The group of 47 patients (38 males and 9 females) was assembled out of persons who survived an outbreak of poisoning by the methanol adulterated alcohol beverages, which happened in the Czech Republic in 2012-2013. The visual evoked potentials examination was performed using monocular checkerboard pattern-reversal stimulation. Two criteria of abnormality were chosen: missing evoked response, and wave P1 latency > 117 ms. Non-parametric statistical methods (median, range, and the median test) were used to analyze factors influencing the VEP abnormality. RESULTS: The visual evoked potential was abnormal in 20 patients (43%), 5 of them had normal visual acuity on the Snellen chart. The VEP abnormality did not correlate significantly with initial serum concentrations of methanol, formic acid or lactate; however, it showed statistically significant inverse relation to the initial serum pH: the subgroup with the abnormal VEP had significantly lower median pH in comparison with the subgroup with the normal VEP (7.16 vs. 7.34, p = 0.04). The abnormality was not related to chronic alcohol abuse. CONCLUSIONS: The visual evoked potentials examination appeared sensitive enough to detected even subclinical impairment of the optic system. Metabolic acidosis is likely to be the key factor related to the development of visual damage induced by methanol. The examination performed with a delay of 1-9 months after the poisoning documented the situation relatively early after the event. It is considered as a baseline for the planned long-term follow-up of the patients, which will make it possible to assess the dynamics of the observed changes, their reversibility, and the occurrence of potential late sequelae.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17014019
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170426120238.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170413s2016 pl f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00452 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26988885
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a pl
- 100 1_
- $a Urban, Pavel $u National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic (Centre for Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Medicine). pavel.urban@szu.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Visual evoked potentials in patients after methanol poisoning / $c P. Urban, S. Zakharov, P. Diblík, D. Pelclová, P. Ridzoň,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: We report the results of the visual evoked potentials (VEP) examination in patients after severe poisoning by methanol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The group of 47 patients (38 males and 9 females) was assembled out of persons who survived an outbreak of poisoning by the methanol adulterated alcohol beverages, which happened in the Czech Republic in 2012-2013. The visual evoked potentials examination was performed using monocular checkerboard pattern-reversal stimulation. Two criteria of abnormality were chosen: missing evoked response, and wave P1 latency > 117 ms. Non-parametric statistical methods (median, range, and the median test) were used to analyze factors influencing the VEP abnormality. RESULTS: The visual evoked potential was abnormal in 20 patients (43%), 5 of them had normal visual acuity on the Snellen chart. The VEP abnormality did not correlate significantly with initial serum concentrations of methanol, formic acid or lactate; however, it showed statistically significant inverse relation to the initial serum pH: the subgroup with the abnormal VEP had significantly lower median pH in comparison with the subgroup with the normal VEP (7.16 vs. 7.34, p = 0.04). The abnormality was not related to chronic alcohol abuse. CONCLUSIONS: The visual evoked potentials examination appeared sensitive enough to detected even subclinical impairment of the optic system. Metabolic acidosis is likely to be the key factor related to the development of visual damage induced by methanol. The examination performed with a delay of 1-9 months after the poisoning documented the situation relatively early after the event. It is considered as a baseline for the planned long-term follow-up of the patients, which will make it possible to assess the dynamics of the observed changes, their reversibility, and the occurrence of potential late sequelae.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a zrakové evokované potenciály $x účinky léků $7 D005074
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a formiáty $x krev $7 D005561
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a koncentrace vodíkových iontů $7 D006863
- 650 _2
- $a kyselina mléčná $x krev $7 D019344
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a methanol $x krev $x farmakologie $x otrava $7 D000432
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a zraková ostrost $7 D014792
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Zakharov, Sergey $u Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic (Department of Occupational Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine). zacharov.sergej@vfn.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Diblík, Pavel $u Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic (Department of Ophthalmology, 1st Faculty of Medicine). pavel.diblik@email.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Pelclová, Daniela $u Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic (Department of Occupational Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine). daniela.pelclova@lf1.cuni.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Ridzoň, Petr $u Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic (Department of Occupational Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine).
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007261 $t International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health $x 1896-494X $g Roč. 29, č. 3 (2016), s. 471-8
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26988885 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170426120557 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1200484 $s 974797
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 29 $c 3 $d 471-8 $i 1896-494X $m International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health $n Int J Occup Med Environ Health $x MED00007261
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170413