Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Dual-Phase Dual-Energy CT in Patients Treated with Erlotinib for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Possible Benefits of Iodine Quantification in Response Assessment

J. Baxa, T. Matouskova, G. Krakorova, B. Schmidt, T. Flohr, M. Sedlmair, J. Bejcek, J. Ferda,

. 2016 ; 26 (8) : 2828-36. [pub] 20151112

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-01-01 to 2017-12-31
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost) from 2008-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 2017-12-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 2017-12-31

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship of dual-phase dual-energy CT (DE-CT) and tumour size in the evaluation of the response to anti-EGFR therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Dual-phase DE-CT was performed in 31 patients with NSCLC before the onset of anti-EGFR (erlotinib) therapy and as follow-up (mean 8 weeks). Iodine uptake (IU; mg/mL) was quantified using prototype software in arterial and venous phases; arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) was calculated. The change of IU before and after therapy onset was compared with anatomical evaluation in maximal transverse diameter and volume (responders vs. non-responders). RESULTS: A significant decrease of IU in venous phase was proved in responders according to all anatomical parameters (p=0.002-0.016). In groups of non-responders, a significant change of IU was not proved with variable trends of development. The most significant change was observed using the anatomical parameter of volume (cut-off 73 %). A significant difference of percentage change in AEF was proved between responding and non-responders (p=0.019-0.043). CONCLUSION: Dual-phase DE-CT with iodine uptake quantification is a feasible method with potential benefit in advanced assessment of anti-EGFR therapy response. We demonstrated a decrease in vascularization in the responding primary tumours and non-significant variable development of vascularization in non-responding tumours. KEY POINTS: • Dual-phase DE-CT is feasible for vascularization assessment of NSCLC with anti-EGFR therapy. • There was a significant decrease of iodine uptake in responding tumours. • There was a non-significant and variable development in non-responding tumours. • There was significant difference of AEF percentage change between responders and non-responders.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17014224
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170428104712.0
007      
ta
008      
170413s2016 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00330-015-4092-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26563350
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Baxa, Jan $u Department of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine and University Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic. baxaj@fnplzen.cz.
245    10
$a Dual-Phase Dual-Energy CT in Patients Treated with Erlotinib for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Possible Benefits of Iodine Quantification in Response Assessment / $c J. Baxa, T. Matouskova, G. Krakorova, B. Schmidt, T. Flohr, M. Sedlmair, J. Bejcek, J. Ferda,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship of dual-phase dual-energy CT (DE-CT) and tumour size in the evaluation of the response to anti-EGFR therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Dual-phase DE-CT was performed in 31 patients with NSCLC before the onset of anti-EGFR (erlotinib) therapy and as follow-up (mean 8 weeks). Iodine uptake (IU; mg/mL) was quantified using prototype software in arterial and venous phases; arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) was calculated. The change of IU before and after therapy onset was compared with anatomical evaluation in maximal transverse diameter and volume (responders vs. non-responders). RESULTS: A significant decrease of IU in venous phase was proved in responders according to all anatomical parameters (p=0.002-0.016). In groups of non-responders, a significant change of IU was not proved with variable trends of development. The most significant change was observed using the anatomical parameter of volume (cut-off 73 %). A significant difference of percentage change in AEF was proved between responding and non-responders (p=0.019-0.043). CONCLUSION: Dual-phase DE-CT with iodine uptake quantification is a feasible method with potential benefit in advanced assessment of anti-EGFR therapy response. We demonstrated a decrease in vascularization in the responding primary tumours and non-significant variable development of vascularization in non-responding tumours. KEY POINTS: • Dual-phase DE-CT is feasible for vascularization assessment of NSCLC with anti-EGFR therapy. • There was a significant decrease of iodine uptake in responding tumours. • There was a non-significant and variable development in non-responding tumours. • There was significant difference of AEF percentage change between responders and non-responders.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a protinádorové látky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000970
650    _2
$a nemalobuněčný karcinom plic $x diagnóza $x farmakoterapie $x sekundární $7 D002289
650    _2
$a erlotinib $x terapeutické užití $7 D000069347
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a jod $7 D007455
650    _2
$a nádory plic $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D008175
650    _2
$a lymfatické uzliny $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D008198
650    _2
$a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    _2
$a pozitronová emisní tomografie $x metody $7 D049268
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Matouskova, Tana $u Department of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine and University Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Krakorova, Gabriela $u Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and University Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Schmidt, Bernhard $u Siemens Healthcare, CT division, Forchheim, Germany.
700    1_
$a Flohr, Thomas $u Siemens Healthcare, CT division, Forchheim, Germany.
700    1_
$a Sedlmair, Martin $u Siemens Healthcare, CT division, Forchheim, Germany.
700    1_
$a Bejcek, Jiri $u Department of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine and University Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ferda, Jiri $u Department of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine and University Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00009646 $t European radiology $x 1432-1084 $g Roč. 26, č. 8 (2016), s. 2828-36
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26563350 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170413 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170428105033 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1200689 $s 975002
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 26 $c 8 $d 2828-36 $e 20151112 $i 1432-1084 $m European radiology $n Eur Radiol $x MED00009646
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170413

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...